[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100659366":3},{"organization":4,"outcomesModule":7,"designInfo":37,"detailedDescription":36,"studyPopulation":36,"armGroups":45,"interventions":58,"overallOfficials":36,"centralContacts":66,"locations":36,"responsibleParty":75,"collaborators":79,"id":84,"slug":85,"hasResults":86,"nctId":87,"briefTitle":88,"officialTitle":88,"acronym":89,"eligibilityCriteria":90,"healthyVolunteers":91,"sex":92,"minAge":93,"maxAge":94,"enrollmentInfo":95,"targetDuration":36,"studyType":98,"phases":99,"briefSummary":101,"conditions":102,"keywords":107,"overallStatus":113,"whyStopped":36,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":114,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":115,"startDateStruct":118,"completionDateStruct":120,"leadSponsor":122,"locationsCount":36},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Teesside University","OTHER",{"primaryOutcomes":8,"secondaryOutcomes":13,"otherOutcomes":36},[9],{"measure":10,"description":11,"timeFrame":12},"Service Satisfaction Scale","A five item scale that can be used to assess and measure satisfaction, acceptability and quality of the intervention. Higher score denote positive outcomes and acceptability. Lower score denotes poor satisfaction and acceptability.","[At the end of intervention (day 2)]",[14,18,21,24,27,30,33],{"measure":15,"description":16,"timeFrame":17},"Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)","The GAD-7 is a seven item scale for screening, measuring and assessing the severity of generalised anxiety disorder. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively.","Baseline (day 1) and at the end of intervention (day 2)",{"measure":19,"description":20,"timeFrame":17},"Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3)","The scale is a 3-item self-reported measure designed for assessing and measuring the level of social support. The sum score ranges from 3 to 14, with high values representing strong levels and low values representing poor levels of social support as indicated as follows: a) 3-8 poor social support, b) 9-11 moderate social support, c) 12-14 strong social support.",{"measure":22,"description":23,"timeFrame":17},"European Quality of Life Scale EQ-5D-5L","The EQ-5D-5L is a 5 item scale designed to aid assessment of the generic quality of life. In the EQ-5D-5L, each dimension has five response levels: no problems (Level 1); slight (Level 2); moderate (Level 3); severe (Level 4); and extreme problems (Level 5). There are 3,125 possible health states defined by combining one level from each dimension, ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health).",{"measure":25,"description":26,"timeFrame":17},"Beliefs around cervical cancer and screening intention scale","A 8-item scale that measure beliefs around cervical cancer, knowledge and intention to engage in screening. Score range from 0-40 with higher score denoting knowledge and strong willingness to engage in early screening uptake.",{"measure":28,"description":29,"timeFrame":17},"Cervical Cancer Knowledge Scale","The Cervical Cancer Knowledge Scale is an 8 item scale that measures knowledge of cervical cancer. The scale uses a true, false and don't know to assess knowledge with correct answer denoting higher knowledge.",{"measure":31,"description":32,"timeFrame":17},"Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Questionnaire (CCSTQ) for Women","Cervical Cancer Screening uptake Questionnaire is a 43 item questionnaire that measures six core dimension including\n\n* Social norms\n* Knowledge and awareness\n* Perceived threat\n* Perceived benefits\n* Perceived barriers\n* Self-efficacy The scale uses a Likert style response and scores. Higher aggregate scores generally reflect positive psychosocial determinants and a stronger likelihood of screening participation.",{"measure":34,"description":35,"timeFrame":17},"Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure (Cervical CAM)","The CAM is a Survey tool used to assess public knowledge, risk perception, and attitudes regarding cervical cancer. The standard Cervical CAM comprises 9 core questions broken down into a total of 31 specific items. Scores are calculated by aggregating individual item responses into specific knowledge or awareness sub-scales. Correct identifications are typically assigned a positive score (e.g., 1 or 2 points for a correct 'Yes'), while incorrect answers or 'don't know' responses score 0. Points across sections are summed to create an overall awareness or knowledge score. Higher composite scores reflect greater familiarity with clinical signs and risk factors, and scores are often categorized into binary thresholds (e.g., \"good\" vs. \"poor\" awareness) for statistical comparison.",null,{"allocation":38,"interventionModel":39,"interventionModelDescription":36,"primaryPurpose":40,"observationalModel":36,"timePerspective":36,"maskingInfo":41},"RANDOMIZED","PARALLEL","PREVENTION",{"masking":42,"maskingDescription":36,"whoMasked":43},"SINGLE",[44],"PARTICIPANT",[46,52],{"label":47,"type":48,"description":49,"interventionNames":50},"cervical cancer Awareness education to aid Confidence and screening upTake (ACT)","EXPERIMENTAL","2 hour worksop session to foster awareness and encourage early cervical cancer screening uptake",[51],"Behavioral: cervical cancer Awareness education to aid Confidence and screening upTake (ACT)",{"label":53,"type":54,"description":55,"interventionNames":56},"Control group","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","The control group will receive intervention as usual. This may be in the form of existing cervical cancer screening information provided in hospitals, media and health centres.",[57],"Other: Control group",[59,63],{"type":60,"name":47,"description":61,"armGroupLabels":62,"otherNames":36},"BEHAVIORAL","The ACT intervention is designed to raise awareness of cervical cancer, its symptoms, implications for late screening, the benefits of early screening, avenues for screening uptake, and also addressing anxiety related to screening uptake. It will also address screening related fear. The ACT intervention is low-intensity and lasts approximately two hours.\n\nOther Name:",[47],{"type":6,"name":53,"description":64,"armGroupLabels":65,"otherNames":36},"Existing information provided by health care provider, including media around prostate cancer.",[53],[67,72],{"name":68,"role":69,"phone":70,"phoneExt":36,"email":71},"Tarela J Ike, Dr","CONTACT","0164234231","T.ike@tees.ac.uk",{"name":73,"role":69,"phone":36,"phoneExt":36,"email":74},"Dung E Jidong, PhD","Dung.jidong@manchester.ac.uk",{"type":76,"investigatorFullName":77,"investigatorTitle":78,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":36,"oldOrganization":36},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Tarela Ike","Senior Lecturer",[80,82],{"name":81,"class":6},"University of Manchester",{"name":83,"class":6},"Jos University Teaching Hospital","100659366","cervical-cancer-awareness-education-to-aid-confidence-and-screening-uptake-act-a-pilot-randomised-control-trial-100659366",false,"NCT07863596","Cervical Cancer Awareness Education to Aid Confidence and Screening upTake (ACT): A Pilot Randomised Control Trial","ACT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Women aged between age 18 years and 64 who are not or partially up to date with cervical cancer\n* Able to provide full consent for their participation.\n* Able to speak the English Language.\n* Able to take part in the intervention and are available for the intervention assessment at baseline and end of intervention.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Less than 18 years\n* Unable to consent.\n* Currently undergoing severe mental health treatment. Unable to speak the English language not meeting the inclusion criteria.",true,"FEMALE","18 Years","64 Years",{"count":96,"type":97},76,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[100],"NA","Cervical cancer remains a major threat to women's health and wellbeing, with the burden disproportionately concentrated in low- and middle-income countries such as Nigeria, where inadequate awareness, limited access to screening, screening-related anxiety, and other structural and sociocultural barriers contribute to low screening uptake, late presentation, and preventable mortality. Despite the urgent need to improve early detection, there remains a critical gap in culturally appropriate, co-produced interventions to address the barriers that shape cervical cancer screening behaviours. The proposed study will address this gap by piloting the feasibility and acceptability of \"cervical cancer Awareness education to aid Confidence and screening upTake (ACT)\" a novel, low-intensity, co-produced workshop intervention for women who are not up to date or only partially up to date with recommended cervical cancer screening. Delivered over approximately two hours, ACT is designed to increase awareness of cervical cancer and its symptoms, strengthen understanding of the consequences of delayed screening and the benefits of early detection, improve knowledge of available screening pathways, address misconceptions and screening-related anxiety, and build women's confidence and motivation to engage with screening services. In addition to assessing recruitment, retention, intervention engagement, acceptability and implementation feasibility, the study will pilot the proposed outcome measures and data collection procedures to inform a future definitive evaluation. It will also generate preliminary evidence on potential intervention mechanisms, screening-related outcomes, and approaches to assessing cost-effectiveness. Collectively, the study will establish whether ACT is feasible, acceptable and sufficiently promising to progress to a larger-scale trial evaluating its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in improving cervical cancer screening uptake among women in Nigeria.",[103,104,105,106],"Anxiety","Cervical Cancer Screening","Health Education","Wellbeing",[108,109,110,111,112],"anxiety","cervical cancer","screening and brief interventions","cervical cancer screening","health education workshop","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-10-02",{"date":116,"type":117},"2026-10-07","ACTUAL",{"date":119,"type":97},"2026-10-12",{"date":121,"type":97},"2027-09-30",{"name":5,"class":6}]