[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100651468":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":20,"overallOfficials":25,"centralContacts":29,"locations":35,"responsibleParty":51,"collaborators":25,"id":55,"slug":56,"hasResults":57,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":60,"acronym":25,"eligibilityCriteria":61,"healthyVolunteers":57,"sex":62,"minAge":63,"maxAge":64,"enrollmentInfo":65,"targetDuration":25,"studyType":68,"phases":69,"briefSummary":71,"conditions":72,"keywords":25,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":25,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":80,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":81,"startDateStruct":84,"completionDateStruct":86,"leadSponsor":88,"locationsCount":89},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Minia University","OTHER",[8,14],{"label":9,"type":10,"description":11,"interventionNames":12},"GROUP I","ACTIVE_COMPARATOR","Immediate Implant Placement Using Conventional Technique",[13],"Procedure: Conventional Technique",{"label":15,"type":16,"description":17,"interventionNames":18},"GROUP II","EXPERIMENTAL","Immediate Implant Placement Using Socket-Shield Technique",[19],"Procedure: Socket-Shield Technique",[21,26],{"type":22,"name":23,"description":11,"armGroupLabels":24,"otherNames":25},"PROCEDURE","Conventional Technique",[9],null,{"type":22,"name":27,"description":17,"armGroupLabels":28,"otherNames":25},"Socket-Shield Technique",[15],[30],{"name":31,"role":32,"phone":33,"phoneExt":25,"email":34},"Omar I Wahedi","CONTACT","+201064769520","wahdi3031@gmail.com",[36],{"facility":5,"status":37,"city":38,"state":25,"zip":25,"country":39,"countryCode":40,"cosmosGeoPoint":41,"geoPoint":46,"contacts":47},"RECRUITING","Minya","Egypt","EG",{"type":42,"coordinates":43},"Point",[44,45],30.75813,28.09193,{"lat":45,"lon":44},[48],{"name":5,"role":32,"phone":49,"phoneExt":25,"email":50},"086 2347768","ddent.office@mu.edu.eg",{"type":52,"investigatorFullName":53,"investigatorTitle":54,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":25,"oldOrganization":25},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR","Omar Ibrahim Wahedi","Principal Investigator","100651468","comparison-between-socket-shield-and-conventional-techniques-in-immediate-implant-placement-100651468",false,"NCT07761442","Comparison Between Socket Shield and Conventional Techniques in Immediate Implant Placement.","Comparative Study Between Using Socket Shield And Conventional Techniques In Immediate Implant Placement (A Randomized Clinical Trial)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 20 and 60 years of both genders\n* All participants should be systemically healthy, as assessed using the dental modification of the Cornell Medical Index.\n* Gingival and periodontal health to be confirmed according to the criteria outlined in the new classification system proposed by Caton et al. (2018).\n* Presence of non-restorable teeth due to trauma, complicated crowns or root fractures.\n* Presence of extensive destructive caries making the tooth unsalvageable, particularly in esthetic zones.\n* Clinical indication for immediate implant placement, especially in cases where minimizing post-extraction bone resorption and soft tissue collapse is critical.\n* Availability of adequate interocclusal space to accommodate the necessary prosthetic components without occlusal interference.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n(for socket-shield technique)\n\n* Pregnant female.\n* Patients with parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, clenching).\n* Smokers.\n* Teeth with clinical mobility.\n* Teeth with root fractures extending below the alveolar bone level.\n* Periodontal ligament space widening.\n* Signs of internal or external root resorption.\n* Current or previous periodontal disease","ALL","20 Years","60 Years",{"count":66,"type":67},16,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[70],"NA","The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare whether immediate implant placement using the socket-shield technique can better preserve bone density, bone level, and peri-implant tissue health compared to conventional immediate implant placement in patients requiring tooth extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone.\n\nThis study is conducted in systemically healthy adult patients aged 20-60 years who have non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth indicated for immediate implant placement.\n\nThe main questions this study aims to answer are:\n\nDoes the socket-shield technique result in better peri-implant bone density and bone level preservation compared to the conventional immediate implant technique?\n\nDoes the socket-shield technique lead to improved clinical peri-implant parameters, including probing depth, bleeding on probing, keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness?\n\nparticipants will be divided into two groups: (both groups will receive immediate implant placement of a tooth requiring extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone.) First group: will recieve immediate implant using conventional technique. second group: will recieve immediate implant using socket shield technique.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Undergo clinical and radiographic examinations, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).\n* Receive immediate implant placement using either the conventional technique or the socket-shield technique.\n* Be followed up clinically and radiographically for 9 months to assess bone and soft tissue healing.\n* Attend regular postoperative and follow-up visits for evaluation of implant stability and peri-implant tissue health.",[73,74,75,76,77,78,79],"Bone Density","Bone Level","Peri-Implant Tissues","Socket Shield Technique Implant Placement","Immediate Implant Placement","Root Submergence Technique","Single Tooth Lost","2026-08-10",{"date":82,"type":83},"2026-08-12","ACTUAL",{"date":85,"type":83},"2025-10-20",{"date":87,"type":67},"2026-11",{"name":5,"class":6},1]