[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100648763":3},{"organization":4,"outcomesModule":7,"designInfo":38,"detailedDescription":51,"studyPopulation":16,"armGroups":52,"interventions":65,"overallOfficials":16,"centralContacts":73,"locations":83,"responsibleParty":106,"collaborators":16,"id":109,"slug":110,"hasResults":111,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":114,"acronym":115,"eligibilityCriteria":116,"healthyVolunteers":111,"sex":117,"minAge":118,"maxAge":119,"enrollmentInfo":120,"targetDuration":16,"studyType":123,"phases":124,"briefSummary":126,"conditions":127,"keywords":130,"overallStatus":86,"whyStopped":16,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":137,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":138,"startDateStruct":141,"completionDateStruct":143,"leadSponsor":145,"locationsCount":146},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Fakih IVF Fertility Center","OTHER",{"primaryOutcomes":8,"secondaryOutcomes":13,"otherOutcomes":16},[9],{"measure":10,"description":11,"timeFrame":12},"Clinical pregnancy rate","Clinical pregnancy confirmation by transvaginal ultrasound at 16 weeks' gestation.","From enrollment to 16 weeks gestation",[14,18,22,26,30,34],{"measure":15,"description":16,"timeFrame":17},"Live birth rate",null,"From enrollment to approximately 40 weeks' gestation.",{"measure":19,"description":20,"timeFrame":21},"Ongoing Pregnancy Rate","16 - 34 weeks gestation by serial ultrasound.","From 16 weeks to 34 weeks gestation.",{"measure":23,"description":24,"timeFrame":25},"Early Pregnancy Loss rate","Pregnancy loss confirmed by a transvaginal ultrasound.","From FET (Fetal Embryo Transfer) to 12 weeks gestation",{"measure":27,"description":28,"timeFrame":29},"Rate of Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs)","Rate of Miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal outcomes (birth weight, NICU admission, congenital anomalies) and maternal outcomes assessed using several methods including transvaginal ultrasound and clinical assessment.","From enrollment to approximately 40 weeks gestation",{"measure":31,"description":32,"timeFrame":33},"Rate of Adverse events","Safety data including pregnancy related, fetal or maternal adverse events e.g. infections, cytopenias, hypersensitivity etc.","From enrollment up to approximately 40 weeks gestation (delivery)",{"measure":35,"description":36,"timeFrame":37},"Rate of immunogenicity","Anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation (serology in subset).","From enrollment to up to approximately 40 weeks gestation (delivery)",{"allocation":39,"interventionModel":40,"interventionModelDescription":41,"primaryPurpose":42,"observationalModel":16,"timePerspective":16,"maskingInfo":43},"RANDOMIZED","PARALLEL","Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial","TREATMENT",{"masking":44,"maskingDescription":45,"whoMasked":46},"QUADRUPLE","This is double blind randomized controlled trial",[47,48,49,50],"PARTICIPANT","CARE_PROVIDER","INVESTIGATOR","OUTCOMES_ASSESSOR","Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) defined as two or more consecutive miscarriages before 20 weeks' gestation affects 1-2% of couples worldwide and remains one of the most distressing, poorly resolved conditions in reproductive medicine. In nearly half of cases, no definitive cause is identified. This burden is especially pronounced in the UAE and wider GCC region, where delayed childbearing and the strong sociocultural weight placed on fertility amplify the psychological, marital, and financial toll of unexplained RPL.\n\nDespite decades of research, treatment remains largely empirical. Immune dysregulation is increasingly implicated as a central mechanism, with proposed pathways including aberrant natural killer (NK) cell activation, impaired regulatory T-cell expansion, inadequate decidualization, and an unfavorable Th1\u002FTh17 cytokine profile, collectively compromising endometrial receptivity and embryo survival. However, most supporting studies have been small, uncontrolled, and unable to distinguish maternal immunological causes from embryo genetic abnormalities, leaving clinicians with few evidence-based options.\n\nGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), a hematopoietic cytokine with immunomodulatory and endometrial effects, has emerged as a promising candidate. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest it enhances endometrial proliferation and vascularization, supports folliculogenesis and oocyte competence, and promotes immune tolerance by expanding regulatory T-cells while reducing NK cell cytotoxicity. Small trials in both recurrent implantation failure and RPL populations have reported benefits in implantation and live birth rates, though results have been inconsistent - largely due to the same methodological limitations noted above, plus a failure to control for embryo aneuploidy as a confounder.\n\nOur own retrospective pilot study of 19 patients receiving intrauterine G-CSF supports this rationale: 70.5% achieved a positive β-hCG, 66.7% progressed to ongoing pregnancy, and no adverse effects were observed. These findings demonstrate both feasibility and preliminary efficacy at our centre. However, intrauterine infusion is invasive, costly, and less patient-friendly; existing literature suggests subcutaneous administration may achieve comparable efficacy with greater convenience, but this route has not yet been evaluated in this specific population.\n\nThe GEM Trial is designed to resolve these open questions directly. By enrolling women with unexplained RPL undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the trial eliminates embryo chromosomal abnormality as a confounder, enabling a precise, mechanistically targeted test of the immunological hypothesis. It will be the first placebo-controlled, genetically controlled trial of G-CSF in this population, and the first to formally assess subcutaneous delivery.\n\nIf successful, the GEM Trial could establish a new standard of care for unexplained RPL offering a more convenient, evidence-based treatment option to thousands of couples and positioning the UAE as a global leader in reproductive immunology research.",[53,59],{"label":54,"type":55,"description":56,"interventionNames":57},"Recombinant G-CSF 130 mcg SC","EXPERIMENTAL","Subcutaneous injection of Recombinant G-CSF daily from embryo transfer until 12 weeks' gestation",[58],"Drug: Recombinant G-CSF",{"label":60,"type":61,"description":62,"interventionNames":63},"Placebo Control: Placebo SC","PLACEBO_COMPARATOR","Subcutaneous injection of placebo daily from embryo transfer until 12 weeks' gestation",[64],"Drug: Placebo control",[66,70],{"type":67,"name":68,"description":56,"armGroupLabels":69,"otherNames":16},"DRUG","Placebo control",[60],{"type":67,"name":71,"description":56,"armGroupLabels":72,"otherNames":16},"Recombinant G-CSF",[54],[74,79],{"name":75,"role":76,"phone":77,"phoneExt":16,"email":78},"Dr. Lamiya Mohiyiddeen, MD, FRCOG","CONTACT","+971543676002","lamiya.mohiyiddeen@fakihivf.com",{"name":80,"role":76,"phone":81,"phoneExt":16,"email":82},"Fatma Bathawab, PhD","+971585707393","fatma.bathawab@fakihivf.com",[84],{"facility":85,"status":86,"city":87,"state":16,"zip":16,"country":88,"countryCode":89,"cosmosGeoPoint":90,"geoPoint":95,"contacts":96},"Fakih IVF Fertility Centre LLC","RECRUITING","Abu Dhabi","United Arab Emirates","AE",{"type":91,"coordinates":92},"Point",[93,94],54.39696,24.45118,{"lat":94,"lon":93},[97,98,99,102,104],{"name":75,"role":76,"phone":77,"phoneExt":16,"email":78},{"name":80,"role":76,"phone":81,"phoneExt":16,"email":82},{"name":100,"role":101,"phone":16,"phoneExt":16,"email":16},"Lamiya Mohiyiddeen, MD, FRCOG","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"name":103,"role":101,"phone":16,"phoneExt":16,"email":16},"Yasmin Sajjad, MD, FRCOG",{"name":105,"role":101,"phone":16,"phoneExt":16,"email":16},"Michael Fakih, MD",{"type":101,"investigatorFullName":107,"investigatorTitle":108,"investigatorAffiliation":5,"oldNameTitle":16,"oldOrganization":16},"Lamiya Mohiyiddeen","Research Director, Research Ethics Committee Chair","100648763","phase-2-efficacy-of-recombinant-human-g-csf-in-women-with-unexplained-recurrent-miscarriage-100648763",false,"NCT07724405","Efficacy of Recombinant Human G-CSF in Women With Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage","A Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Recombinant Human G-CSF in Women With Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage After IVF With PGT-A Screened Euploid Embryo Transfer","GEM","Inclusion:\n\n1. Women aged 18-44 years\n2. ≥2 unexplained pregnancy losses\n3. Undergoing IVF with PGT-A tested embryos\n4. BMI 19-35 kg\u002Fm² 6.\n\nExclusion:\n\n1. Parental karyotype abnormalities\n2. Correctable uterine abnormalities\n3. Systemic autoimmune disease \u002F thrombophilia\n4. Uncontrolled systemic illness (e.g. diabetes, infection)\n5. Previous G-CSF therapy\n6. Hypersensitivity to rhG-CSF or E. coli proteins\n7. HIV, malignancy within 5 years, or severe cardiovascular\u002Frespiratory history","FEMALE","18 Years","44 Years",{"count":121,"type":122},150,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[125],"PHASE2","Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), commonly referred to as recurrent miscarriage, affects approximately 1-2% of couples attempting to conceive. In nearly half of these cases, no definitive cause can be identified despite thorough clinical evaluation. A circumstance that is both distressing and disorienting for affected families, particularly in settings such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), where childbearing carries significant personal and cultural weight.\n\nOne leading hypothesis is that the underlying problem may not lie with the embryo itself, but with the way the mother's immune system responds to a developing pregnancy. Under normal physiological conditions, the maternal body must establish immune tolerance toward an embryo that is genetically half-foreign in origin. In some women, this tolerance mechanism may be impaired, reducing the likelihood that a pregnancy will successfully implant and progress.\n\nThis study will evaluate whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) a naturally occurring substance that normally stimulates the production of immune cells can help address this issue by modulating an overactive immune response and enhancing the uterine environment's capacity to support pregnancy. Notably, the study will enroll only women whose embryos have undergone genetic testing and been confirmed to be chromosomally normal. This eliminates embryo quality as a contributing factor to pregnancy loss and allows for a clearer assessment of whether G-CSF itself influences outcomes.\n\nEarlier small-scale studies, including preliminary work conducted at our own centre, have shown encouraging results. This new trial builds on that foundation by enrolling a larger cohort, comparing G-CSF against a placebo (an inactive comparison treatment), and evaluating a simpler route of administration; subcutaneous injection, rather than direct infusion into the uterus. Together, these design features aim to provide the most reliable evidence to date on whether this treatment can meaningfully help couples affected by unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.",[128,129],"Recurrent Pregnancy Loss","Recurrent Miscarriages",[131,132,133,134,135,136],"T helper cells","Immunological causes of miscarriage","miscarriage","pregnancy loss","granulocyte-colony stimulating factor","G-CSF","2026-07-20",{"date":139,"type":140},"2026-07-24","ACTUAL",{"date":142,"type":140},"2026-07-10",{"date":144,"type":122},"2027-10-10",{"name":5,"class":6},1]