[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Clinique Bizet\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":235},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,9,0,[8,44,77,113,132,154,174,193,213],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100649386","evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-ait-in-the-treatment-of-pain-related-to-pancreatic-cancer-100649386",false,"NCT07733427","Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer","A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer","PIT","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nSubject aged over 20 years\n\n* Patient with histologically confirmed pancreatic carcinoma\n* Chronic cancer-related pain that is inadequately controlled by standard treatment or for whom analgesics are contraindicated.\n* EMO \\\u003C 120 mg\u002Fday Patients experiencing side effects: sedation, vomiting, constipation, or an allergy to morphine.\n* Signed informed consent\n* Participants affiliated with or eligible for a social security scheme\n* Agree to complete the various study questionnaires\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nPatients under the age of 20.\n\n* Contraindications to intratracheal analgesia\n* Acute respiratory infection\n* Uncontrolled coagulation disorder\n* Pregnancy or breastfeeding\n* Unable to comply with medical follow-up for the study.\n* Adults who are legally protected, under guardianship or under a conservatorship","ALL","20 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of intratracheal analgesia on pain intensity in cancer patients, from the start of treatment up to 3 months. It will also investigate the safety of this technique. The main questions it seeks to answer are as follows:\n\nWhat is the impact on the use of opioid analgesics, and can this be measured? What is the quality of life? What is the quality of sleep, and can this be assessed? How does the patient's weight change? Is the patient satisfied? What is the patient's overall survival?\n\nThe researchers will assess the equivalent daily dose of morphine (mg\u002Fday) between enrolment and follow-up visits, as well as the number of patients requiring an escalation of analgesic treatment. Overall quality of life score measured using the ESAS questionnaire between enrolment and follow-up visits; satisfaction assessed using a numerical satisfaction scale (0-10); sleep quality assessed using the ISI questionnaire; and the tolerability and safety of the technique assessed by monitoring adverse events.\n\nEligible participants:\n\nFollowing implantation of the intrathecal pump, participants will have scheduled consultations at day 30, then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, with questionnaires to be completed.",[27,28,29,30],"Pancreatic Cancer Pain","Intrathecal Analgesic","Intrathecal Administration of the Drug","Pancreatic Carcinoma","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-07-30",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-07-31","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":21},"2026-06",{"date":39,"type":21},"2027-12",{"name":41,"class":42},"Clinique Bizet","OTHER",3,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":49,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":76},"100649223","4-electrode-ecg-digitalcardio-vs-standard-10-electrode-ecg-evaluating-ease-of-use-and-recording-quality-100649223","NCT07732283","4-electrode ECG (DigitalCardio®) vs Standard 10-electrode ECG: Evaluating Ease of Use and Recording Quality","FAST-ECG","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nHospitalized Cardiology Patients:\n\n* Age minimum 18 years\n* Hospitalized for an acute or chronic cardiac condition (e.g., heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia, valvular heart disease, etc.)\n* Ability to give informed consent\n* Hemodynamic stability permitting the performance of an ECG without clinical risk\n\nCardiology Outpatients:\n\n* Age minimum of 18 years\n* Follow-up for a known cardiac condition or suspected cardiovascular disease\n* No contraindications to performing an ECG\n* Informed consent obtained\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Minor patient (\\\u003C 18 years of age)\n* Adult subject under legal protection, under temporary guardianship, curatorship, or tutelage\n* Patient refusing to participate in the study\n* Presence of an implantable cardiac device (e.g., pacemaker, defibrillator) that may interfere with ECG measurements\n* Severe skin condition preventing the placement of electrodes\n* Physical or cognitive inability to follow the study protocol\n* Current pregnancy",true,"18 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},50,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the time required to record a complete Electrocardiogram (ECG) trace using the DigitalCardio (CardioSecur®) tablet device versus a standard 12-lead ECG device in eligible patients.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nIs there a difference in diagnostic recording time (in minutes) between the DigitalCardio tablet and a standard ECG machine? How do the two devices compare in terms of trace quality (including QRS duration, QT interval, frontal axis measurements, and missing\u002Ferroneous leads)? How satisfied are healthcare professionals with the CardioSecur® device?\n\nResearchers will compare Group A (standard 10-electrode ECG followed by 4-electrode ECG) to Group B (4-electrode ECG followed by standard 10-electrode ECG) in a 1:1 randomized crossover design to evaluate recording efficiency and trace quality.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nComplete an initial screening visit with the principal investigator to review eligibility criteria and sign the informed consent form.\n\nBe randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either Group A or Group B. Undergo both ECG recording methods sequentially (a standard 10-electrode ECG and a 4-electrode ECG using the DigitalCardio tablet), while researchers measure the total time elapsed from electrode placement to obtaining a complete trace.",[58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65],"4-electrode Tablet-based Electrocardiogram (ECG) System","Electrical Activity of the Heart","Atrial or Ventricular Arrhythmias","Intracardiac Conduction Abnormalities","QT Interval Prolongation","Myocardial Ischemia","Ventricular Hypertrophy","Tandard 12-lead (10-electrode) ECG Device",[67,68],"4-electrode tablet-based Electrocardiogram (ECG) system","standard 12-lead (10-electrode) ECG device","2026-07-28",{"date":71,"type":35},"2026-07-29",{"date":37,"type":21},{"date":74,"type":21},"2027-03",{"name":41,"class":42},2,{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":83,"eligibilityCriteria":84,"healthyVolunteers":51,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":96,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":105,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":106,"startDateStruct":108,"completionDateStruct":110,"leadSponsor":112,"locationsCount":76},"100648474","evaluation-of-the-effect-of-reiki-on-pain-after-lumbar-surgery-100648474","NCT07722117","Evaluation of the Effect of Reiki on Pain After Lumbar Surgery","Evaluation of the Effect of Reiki on Pain After Lumbar Surgery: A Comparative Randomized, Double-blind, Pilot Study","REDAL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject aged 18 years or older.\n* Referred for a lumbar surgery.\n* Absence of participation in another clinical study.\n* Subject affiliated with a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Neuropathic patient\n* Presence of neuropathic pain\n* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia\n* Received therapeutic touch, polarity therapy, or professional massage therapy in the past four weeks\n* Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study\n* Adult subject protected by law, under guardianship or trusteeship",{"count":86,"type":21},60,[24],"The goal of this clinical trial (prospective, comparative, and randomized double-blind study) is to learn if Reiki (a non-pharmacological intervention), when used alongside standard care, can treat and reduce postoperative pain in patients recovering from lumbar surgery (60 participants total, divided into two groups of 30).\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes Reiki significantly reduce postoperative pain levels at day 15 (measured by a Visual Analog Scale) compared to a Sham (placebo) treatment? Does Reiki improve patient quality of life, enhance scar healing, lower daily analgesic consumption, and increase overall patient satisfaction compared to the Sham treatment?\n\nResearchers will compare Group A (30 patients receiving Reiki sessions alongside usual care) to Group B (30 patients receiving Sham\u002Fplacebo sessions alongside usual care) to see if the Reiki group experiences lower pain levels, reduced need for painkillers, better healing, and higher overall satisfaction and quality of life.\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Receive standard postoperative care following their lumbar surgery.\n* Be randomly assigned to receive either two sessions of actual Reiki therapy or two sessions of a Sham (placebo) treatment.\n* Evaluate their daily pain levels using a Visual Analog Scale (EVA).\n* Complete follow-up assessments at specific intervals (Day 15, Day 21, and Day 30) to track pain levels, pain medication intake, scar healing (using a colorimetric scale), quality of life (via the SF-12 questionnaire), and overall satisfaction (via the Clinical Global Impression scale).",[90,91,92,93,94,95],"The Lumbar Spine Surgical Intervention","Arthrodesis","Severe Herniated Disc","Scoliosis","the Positive Effect of Energy Therapy on Pain Reduction","Alternative to Reduce Analgesic Dependence",[97,98,99,100,101,102,103],"scoliosis","NSAIDs","surgery for lumbar herniated disc","Reiki","energy therapy","the positive effect of energy therapy on pain reduction","alternative to reduce analgesic dependence","RECRUITING","2026-07-23",{"date":107,"type":35},"2026-07-24",{"date":109,"type":35},"2025-09-10",{"date":111,"type":21},"2028-06",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":114,"slug":115,"hasResults":11,"nctId":116,"briefTitle":117,"officialTitle":118,"acronym":119,"eligibilityCriteria":120,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":121,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":122,"briefSummary":123,"conditions":124,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":105,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":126,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":131,"locationsCount":76},"100618798","the-effect-of-auriculotherapy-on-the-treatment-of-postoperative-pain-in-outpatient-rhizarthrosis-surgery-100618798","NCT07336303","The Effect of Auriculotherapy on the Treatment of Postoperative Pain in Outpatient Rhizarthrosis Surgery","Comparative Study on the Effect of Auriculotherapy in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain in Outpatient Surgery: Rhizarthrosis PARALLEL COMPARATIVE STUDY RANDOMIZED AND DOUBLE-BLIND","AURDOII","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject aged over 18 years\n* Patients hospitalized for endoscopic treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (rhizarthrosis)\n* Patient with no prior history of auriculotherapy sessions\n* No participation in another clinical study\n* Subject affiliated with, or beneficiary of, a social security system\n* Agrees to complete all study questionnaires\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient under 18 years of age\n* Unable to comply with medical follow-up required for the study\n* Adult subject under legal protection, guardianship, or trusteeship\n* Patient with neuropathic pain",{"count":86,"type":21},[24],"Auriculotherapy has demonstrated promising potential in the management of postoperative pain. Additionally, one study reported encouraging outcomes regarding the reduction of anxiety levels among patients in primary healthcare settings. Nevertheless, further high-quality research is required to substantiate these findings and to support the integration of auriculotherapy into standardized therapeutic protocols.\n\nThe objective of this prospective, comparative, double-blind study is to assess the efficacy of auricular acupuncture in the management of postoperative pain following outpatient prosthetic surgery for rhizarthrosis",[125],"Thumb Arthritis",{"date":107,"type":35},{"date":128,"type":35},"2026-02-01",{"date":130,"type":21},"2027-02",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":133,"slug":134,"hasResults":11,"nctId":135,"briefTitle":136,"officialTitle":137,"acronym":83,"eligibilityCriteria":138,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":139,"enrollmentInfo":140,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":141,"briefSummary":142,"conditions":143,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":145,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":146,"startDateStruct":148,"completionDateStruct":150,"leadSponsor":152,"locationsCount":153},"100597719","evaluation-of-the-effect-of-reiki-on-pain-after-spinal-fusion-100597719","NCT07062146","Evaluation of the Effect of Reiki on Pain After Spinal Fusion","Evaluation of the Effect of Reiki on Pain After Spinal Fusion: A Comparative, Randomized, Pilot Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\- Subject aged 18 years or older;\n* Referred for a lumbar fusion of up to 3 levels.\n* Absence of participation in another clinical study.\n* Subject affiliated with a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Neuropathic patient\n* Presence of neuropathic pain\n* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia\n* Received therapeutic touch, polarity therapy, or professional massage therapy in the past four weeks\n* Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study\n* Adult subject protected by law, under guardianship or trusteeship","75 Years",{"count":86,"type":21},[24],"This study involves patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery (lumbar arthrodesis). It compares the effects of Reiki, an energy-based therapy, with conventional approaches to relieve postoperative pain.\n\nThe goal is to determine whether this non-drug method can help reduce pain, limit the use of painkillers, and enhance patient comfort during recovery.",[144],"Chirurgical Intervention","2026-07-08",{"date":147,"type":35},"2026-07-09",{"date":149,"type":35},"2025-09-09",{"date":151,"type":21},"2028-01-31",{"name":41,"class":42},1,{"id":155,"slug":156,"hasResults":11,"nctId":157,"briefTitle":158,"officialTitle":159,"acronym":160,"eligibilityCriteria":161,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":139,"enrollmentInfo":162,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":163,"briefSummary":164,"conditions":165,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":166,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":167,"startDateStruct":169,"completionDateStruct":171,"leadSponsor":173,"locationsCount":153},"100577732","effects-of-osteopathic-management-on-disability-and-quality-of-life-after-lumbar-arthrodesis-100577732","NCT06802120","Effects of Osteopathic Management on Disability and Quality of Life After Lumbar Arthrodesis","Effects of Osteopathic Management on Disability and Quality of Life After Lumbar Arthrodesis. A PARALLEL, RANDOMIZED AND DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY","OSTEODESE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* having experienced a lumbar arthrodesis (of one to three levels) four weeks before inclusion\n* being under a stable pharmacological treatment over the last month\n* who are suffering from postoperative mechanical pain (VAS ≥ 4)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* neuropathic pain according to a DN4 score greater than or equal to 4\u002F10,\n* are suffering from fibromyalgia,\n* algodystrophy,\n* other somatic or neuropsychiatric diseases (other than depression and anxiety),\n* have received osteopathic treatment over the last three month prior to inclusion,\n* are included in another interventional research protocol during the study period",{"count":20,"type":21},[24],"The aim of our study is to assess the effect of a combined physiotherapy and osteopathy treatment versus a placebo on the management of disability and quality of life after lumbar arthrodesis. This study will provide a better assessment of the use of osteopathy as a non pharmacological approach to post-operative management.\n\nFor this purpose, We will analyze the effects of these two approaches, targeted and non-targeted osteopathy (TO vs. NTO), on patients' disability and quality of life after surgery.",[144],"2026-01-02",{"date":168,"type":35},"2026-01-06",{"date":170,"type":35},"2025-01-02",{"date":172,"type":21},"2027-05",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":175,"slug":176,"hasResults":11,"nctId":177,"briefTitle":178,"officialTitle":179,"acronym":180,"eligibilityCriteria":181,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":182,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":183,"briefSummary":184,"conditions":185,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":166,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":187,"startDateStruct":188,"completionDateStruct":190,"leadSponsor":192,"locationsCount":76},"100576017","impact-of-auriculotherapy-on-postoperative-pain-in-patients-undergoing-surgery-for-scc-100576017","NCT06779812","Impact of Auriculotherapy on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Surgery for SCC","Impact of Auriculotherapy on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Surgery for SCC. Parallel, Randomized, and Double-Blind Comparative Study","AURDO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects aged over 20 years\n* Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome scheduled for endoscopic surgery\n* Patients who have never undergone auriculotherapy sessions before\n* No participation in another clinical study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 20 years of age\n* Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study\n* Legally protected adult subjects, under guardianship or curatorship",{"count":54,"type":21},[24],"Auriculotherapy shows promising potential for pain management in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Studies have demonstrated encouraging results in pain reduction and improvement in quality of life. However, further research is required to strengthen these findings and fully integrate auriculotherapy into standard treatment protocols for CTS.\n\nthis prospective, double-blind comparative study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of auricular acupuncture in managing postoperative pain following outpatient carpal tunnel surgery",[186],"Pain After Carpal Tunnel Surgery",{"date":168,"type":35},{"date":189,"type":35},"2025-04-11",{"date":191,"type":21},"2026-03",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":194,"slug":195,"hasResults":11,"nctId":196,"briefTitle":197,"officialTitle":198,"acronym":199,"eligibilityCriteria":200,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":52,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":201,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":203,"briefSummary":204,"conditions":205,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":166,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":207,"startDateStruct":208,"completionDateStruct":210,"leadSponsor":212,"locationsCount":153},"100569362","study-of-transaxillary-robotic-thyroidectomy-versus-standard-open-thyroidectomy-prospective-comparative-single-center-study-100569362","NCT06693258","Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy: Prospective, Comparative Single-Center Study","A Comparative Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy","CARTO","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subject aged over 20 years\n* Referred for a thyroidectomy (total or partial)\n* Absence of participation in another clinical study\n* Subject affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme\n* Accepts the completion of the various study questionnaires\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient under 20 years of age.\n* Patients who have undergone combined radical cervical lymph node dissection\n* Patient with a postoperative wound problem\n* Patient with an underlying systemic disease that may influence the wound healing process\n* Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study.",{"count":202,"type":21},100,[24],"The aim of our study is to evaluate the two surgical approaches, standard thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy, in terms of postoperative pain management, scar quality, quality of life, as well as the occurrence of postoperative complications (hypocalcemia, compressive cervical hematoma and nerve stimulation)",[206],"Carpal Tunnel Surgery",{"date":168,"type":35},{"date":209,"type":35},"2024-11-25",{"date":211,"type":21},"2026-07",{"name":41,"class":42},{"id":214,"slug":215,"hasResults":11,"nctId":216,"briefTitle":217,"officialTitle":218,"acronym":219,"eligibilityCriteria":220,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":221,"maxAge":222,"enrollmentInfo":223,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":224,"phases":4,"briefSummary":225,"conditions":226,"keywords":228,"overallStatus":104,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":166,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":230,"startDateStruct":231,"completionDateStruct":233,"leadSponsor":234,"locationsCount":153},"100522099","rhizarthrosis-surgery-and-functional-recovery-arthroplasty-vs-trapezectomy-100522099","NCT06078189","Rhizarthrosis Surgery and Functional Recovery: Arthroplasty vs. Trapezectomy","Comparing Short-Term Functional Recovery After Surgery for Rhizarthrosis: Arthroplasty vs. Trapezectomy - A Prospective Randomized Evaluation","TRAPEzE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age \\>45 years\n2. Symptomatic trapezius-metacarpal osteoarthritis after failure of medical treatment ( night orthosis 3 months + failure of 2 infiltrations\u002Fyear)\n3. Patient who has given his\u002Fher consent to participate in the study after being informed by the surgeon,\n4. Patient living in France and able to answer the survey alone.\n5. Subject affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of such a system\n6. No participation in any other clinical study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Minor patient\n2. Trapezium height \\\u003C 8 mm\n3. Major subject protected by law, under curatorship or guardianship\n4. Known allergy to the materials of the medical device\n5. Local infection\n6. Local skin necrosis or unhealed wound\n7. Pregnant or nursing women","45 Years","85 Years",{"count":54,"type":21},"OBSERVATIONAL","Rhizarthrosis is a form of osteoarthritis that affects the trapeziometacarpal joint at the base of the thumb, which is more common in women over 50. Genetic and hormonal factors as well as the frequency of certain physical movements may contribute to its appearance. Surgical treatment is recommended if medical treatment fails, and trapezectomy is currently considered the standard method, although 3rd generation trapeziometacarpal prostheses are also available.\n\nThe aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results after surgical treatment of rhizarthrosis: prosthesis versus trapezectomy.",[227],"Rhizarthrosis",[229],"osteoarthritis - Trapezectomy",{"date":168,"type":35},{"date":232,"type":35},"2023-11-24",{"date":172,"type":21},{"name":41,"class":42},""]