[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Clinique Générale dAnnecy\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":182},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,46,76,103,131,154],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":45},"100641911","reverse-total-shoulder-arthroplasty-with-or-without-partial-coracoidectomy-evaluation-of-functional-internal-rotation-100641911",false,"NCT07604714","Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With or Without Partial Coracoidectomy: Evaluation of Functional Internal Rotation","Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With or Without Partial Coracoidectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Functional Internal Rotation","I-CORE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Adults undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), including primary procedures or fracture repair. Indications may include arthropathy due to a rotator cuff tear, primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an irreparable rotator cuff tear, or post-traumatic arthritis.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of coracoid fractures or who have previously undergone surgery involving the coracoid process.\n* Patients undergoing latissimus dorsi transfers\n* Presence of an active infection, inflammatory arthritis, or a tumor affecting the shoulder region.\n* Patients with pre-existing neuromuscular disorders affecting shoulder function\n* Patients who are unwilling or unable to participate in the trial or complete follow-up assessments\n* Patients deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative order, in pretrial detention, or under guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial protection.\n* Pregnant women, women in labor, or breastfeeding women\n* Patients receiving psychiatric care\n* Patients not enrolled in a social security program","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},60,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This project aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the functional outcomes and complications of standard reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty combined with partial coracoidectomy. The study will assess functional internal rotation at 12 months post-surgery, as measured by the ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring Internal Rotation) score.",[27],"Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty",[29,30,31,32],"reverse total shoulder arthroplasty","ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring Internal Rotation)","functional internal rotation","coracoidectomy","RECRUITING","2026-08-18",{"date":36,"type":37},"2026-08-19","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":37},"2026-06-16",{"date":41,"type":21},"2030-04-01",{"name":43,"class":44},"Clinique Générale dAnnecy","OTHER",1,{"id":47,"slug":48,"hasResults":11,"nctId":49,"briefTitle":50,"officialTitle":50,"acronym":51,"eligibilityCriteria":52,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":53,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":55,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":4},"100651239","surgical-stabilization-of-anterior-shoulder-instability-using-the-open-latarjet-procedure-with-or-without-anterior-capsuloplasty-using-the-coracoacromial-ligament-100651239","NCT07756827","Surgical Stabilization of Anterior Shoulder Instability Using the Open Latarjet Procedure, With or Without Anterior Capsuloplasty Using the Coracoacromial Ligament.","SCIFI-L","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Recurrent anterior shoulder instability with critical glenoid bone loss and a potential concomitant Hill-Sachs lesion requiring surgical management.\n* Patients must be able to provide written informed consent and be willing to adhere to the postoperative rehabilitation protocol and the scheduled follow-up.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of bone stabilization procedures on the affected shoulder\n* Multidirectional shoulder instability\n* Full-thickness rotator cuff tear\n* Neuromuscular disorder affecting shoulder function and range of motion\n* Active infection, inflammatory arthritis, or tumor affecting the shoulder region\n* Patients unable or unwilling to participate in the study or to undergo follow-up assessments\n* Individuals deprived of liberty, in pre-trial detention, or under guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection\n* Individuals undergoing psychiatric care\n* Individuals not affiliated with a social security scheme",{"count":54,"type":21},42,[24],"This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility and relevance of comparing the open Latarjet procedure performed with and without capsular repair (via coracoacromial ligament transfer) in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. It will also generate preliminary data on potential differences between the two techniques regarding stability, complications, range of motion, and functional outcomes-from an exploratory standpoint, without aiming to formally demonstrate efficacy.\n\nThe study results could generate hypotheses to better define the role of capsular repair in the Latarjet procedure and guide the design of a future, adequately powered randomized controlled trial, taking into account not only mechanical outcomes but also functional and psychological dimensions.",[58],"Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability",[60,61,62,63,64,65,66],"Anterior shoulder instability","Latarjet procedure","Pilot randomized controlled trial","Return to sport","Functional outcomes","Coracoacromial ligament","Kinesiophobia","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-08-05",{"date":70,"type":37},"2026-08-11",{"date":72,"type":21},"2026-08-31",{"date":74,"type":21},"2031-02-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":11,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":82,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":86,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":90,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":96,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":97,"startDateStruct":99,"completionDateStruct":100,"leadSponsor":102,"locationsCount":4},"100647944","arthroscopic-stabilization-of-anterior-shoulder-instability-with-subcritical-glenoid-bone-loss-100647944","NCT07715162","Arthroscopic Stabilization of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss","Arthroscopic Stabilization of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Comparison Between Dynamic Anterior Stabilization and the Latarjet Procedure","SHIELD","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* aged 18 or older\n* with symptomatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability indicating the need for surgical stabilization\n* whose glenoid bone loss must be classified as subcritical, approximately between 13.5% and 20%, according to the criteria defined in the protocol\n* with HAGL lesions\n* with bone lesions\n* capable of providing informed consent and complying with the planned 24-month follow-up\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* with glenoid bone loss exceeding 20%\n* with a clear indication for another procedure not covered by the protocol (particularly if routine bone grafting is required and incompatible with the study)\n* with a history of bone stabilization of the affected shoulder\n* with a transfixing rotator cuff tear or a neurological condition impairing shoulder function\n* unable to guarantee adequate follow-up\n* under legal guardianship (curatorship, guardianship, or judicial protection)\n* deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative order\n* receiving psychiatric care\n* not enrolled in a social security program",{"count":85,"type":21},84,[24],"Recurrent anterior shoulder instability is a common condition among young and active patients, with a significant impact on function and a high risk of recurrence in the absence of appropriate management. Quantifying glenoid bone loss has become a central component of the treatment strategy, with losses exceeding 20 % traditionally considered critical and requiring a coracoid transfer according to the Latarjet procedure. Recent data have, however, shown that so-called \"subcritical\" bone loss, ranging from 13.5 to 20%, may already be associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, particularly in highly active patients. These patients most often present with associated humeral lesions, such as Hill-Sachs lesions, and sometimes other concomitant lesions such as Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament, underscoring the need for a comprehensive therapeutic approach.\n\nTwo arthroscopic techniques are currently used for this indication. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure restores glenoid bone stock and improves dynamic stability through the combined effect of the bone block and the sling, while offering reduced morbidity compared to the open approach. Dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS), on the other hand, involves transferring the long biceps tendon to the anterior glenoid rim to replicate the sling effect in a less invasive manner, while preserving the pectoralis minor and the thoracoacromial pedicle and reducing the risk of neurological complications.\n\nAlthough both techniques have shown low recurrence rates and functional improvement in the short and medium term, no Level I randomized prospective study has directly compared their outcomes in patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss and combined lesions, as the available data are primarily derived from retrospective studies or case series.\n\nDue to the biomechanical differences between the two techniques, the associated rehabilitation protocols also differ. Thus, this study compares not only the surgical procedures themselves, but two comprehensive therapeutic strategies that include both surgery and rehabilitation.\n\nThis project aims to determine whether, in these patients, treatment with DAS yields functional outcomes comparable to those of treatment with arthroscopic Latarjet surgery while reducing morbidity and the risk of overtreatment. The evaluation will be based on validated functional and quality-of-life scores. The primary outcome measure will be the WOSI score. The results of this study could help refine surgical indications and optimize care for a population that is predominantly young and active.",[89],"Anterior Shoulder Instability",[60,91,92,93,94,95],"arthroscopic Latarjet procedure","dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS)","WOSI","subcritical glenoid bone loss","Hill-Sachs","2026-07-20",{"date":98,"type":37},"2026-07-22",{"date":96,"type":21},{"date":101,"type":21},"2030-11-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":104,"slug":105,"hasResults":11,"nctId":106,"briefTitle":107,"officialTitle":108,"acronym":109,"eligibilityCriteria":110,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":111,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":112,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":114,"briefSummary":115,"conditions":116,"keywords":118,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":123,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":124,"startDateStruct":126,"completionDateStruct":128,"leadSponsor":130,"locationsCount":45},"100575424","biceps-tenodesis-with-360-suture-anchor-versus-self-locking-tenodesis-in-the-absence-of-rotator-cuff-tears-100575424","NCT06772103","Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis In the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears","Biceps Tenodesis With 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self-Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Protocol for a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (BLAST-2)","Blast2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pathology of the LHBT or SLAP-type lesion based on clinical symptoms\n* Partial-thickness rupture or absence of full-thickness rupture of the rotator cuff of the subscapular, supraspinatus and\u002For infraspinatus tendons, diagnosed preoperatively on ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff diagnosed preoperatively on ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI.\n* Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, defined by narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space or osteophytes, using AP radiography of the affected shoulder.\n* Previous surgery on the affected shoulder\n* Patients presenting with motor paralysis of the shoulder\n* Preoperative presence of the Popeye sign or documented LHBT rupture\n* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments in French or English.\n* Pregnant or breast-feeding patient\n* Protected adult patient\n* Patient not covered by social security.","40 Years",{"count":113,"type":21},98,[24],"This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double-loop 360 lasso biceps tenodesis for the treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) during shoulder arthroscopy in patients without arthroscopic rotator cuff tears. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. However, these studies were carried out on patients with rotator cuff tears, and so it has not been possible to directly compare the two procedures. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis in patients without rotator cuff tears. Given its potential advantages, autobloc biceps tenodesis could become the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with long biceps tendon pathology.",[117],"SLAP Lesion",[119,120,121,122],"biceps","tenodesis","imaging","tendon repair","2026-07-08",{"date":125,"type":37},"2026-07-09",{"date":127,"type":37},"2025-01-22",{"date":129,"type":21},"2030-01-01",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":132,"slug":133,"hasResults":11,"nctId":134,"briefTitle":135,"officialTitle":135,"acronym":136,"eligibilityCriteria":137,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":111,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":138,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":140,"briefSummary":141,"conditions":142,"keywords":144,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":147,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":148,"startDateStruct":150,"completionDateStruct":151,"leadSponsor":153,"locationsCount":45},"100575633","biceps-lasso-loop-and-self--locking-tenodesis-alongside-repair-of-rotator-cuff-tears-randomised-controlled-trial-study-protocol-blast-1-100575633","NCT06774820","Biceps Lasso Loop and Self- Locking Tenodesis Alongside Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: Randomised Controlled Trial Study Protocol (BLAST 1)","BLAST1","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Rotator cuff tear: confirmed preoperative diagnosis of a non- traumatic, full- thickness tear of the supraspinatus and\u002For infraspinatus and\u002For subscapularis tendon, as evidenced by ultrasound, arthro- CT or MRI.\n* Language proficiency: sufficient to allow for communication during the informed consent process and for the completion of the study questionnaires.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Tear type: partial thickness rotator cuff tears are excluded.\n* Tear severity: individuals with massive or irreparable rotator cuff tears are excluded.\n* Fatty degeneration: presence of rotator cuff muscle fatty degeneration classified as Grade 4 according to the Goutallier system will result in exclusion.\n* Glenohumeral osteoarthritis: patients exhibiting glenohumeral osteoarthritis, defined radiographically by the presence of joint space narrowing or osteophytes on anteroposterior (radiographs of the affected shoulder) will be excluded.\n* Prior shoulder surgery: history of previous surgical intervention on the affected shoulder will result in exclusion.\n* Popeye sign: preoperative presence of the Popeye sign will result in exclusion.\n* Cognitive impairment: pre- existing dementia or any condition that impairs the ability to understand study procedures and complete questionnaires and assessments is an exclusion criterion.\n* Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patients.\n* Persons under legal protection (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice).\n* Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative measure\n* Persons under psychiatric care\n* Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme",{"count":139,"type":21},100,[24],"The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double 360 lasso loop biceps tenodesis for the treatment of long chief of biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tendon pathology during shoulder arthroscopy in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis. Given its potential advantages, self-locking biceps tenodesis could emerge as the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons to choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients suffering from long biceps tendon pathology.",[143],"Rotator Cuff Injury",[145,119,146],"rotator cuff","long biceps tendon","2026-07-03",{"date":149,"type":37},"2026-07-07",{"date":127,"type":37},{"date":152,"type":21},"2028-01-15",{"name":43,"class":44},{"id":155,"slug":156,"hasResults":11,"nctId":157,"briefTitle":158,"officialTitle":159,"acronym":160,"eligibilityCriteria":161,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":162,"enrollmentInfo":163,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":165,"briefSummary":166,"conditions":167,"keywords":169,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":174,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":175,"startDateStruct":177,"completionDateStruct":179,"leadSponsor":181,"locationsCount":45},"100527986","rehabilitation-by-multifactorial-approach-after-a-latarjet-procedure-100527986","NCT06154889","Rehabilitation by Multifactorial Approach After a Latarjet Procedure","Rehabilitation by Multifactorial Approach After a Latarjet Procedure : Prospective Single-center Randomized Study (MATASI-L)","MATASI-L","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Primary or recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder\n2. Indication of abutment according to Latarjet (arthroscopic or open sky)\n3. Age: 18-67 years\n4. Understanding of the French language spoken and written\n5. Written informed consent (in accordance with to ICH-GCP guidelines)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Posterior or multidirectional instability of the shoulder (Beighton score \\>5)\n2. Age \\\u003C18 or \\>67 years.\n3. Patients with additional rotator cuff tear.\n4. Patients with a history of surgery on either shoulder.\n5. Patients with connective tissue disorders (eg Ehler-Danlos).\n6. Patients with (current) anxiety disorders or using anxiolytic medications (eg, antipsychotics) (criterion based on patient record\u002Findications).\n7. Patients with neurological disorders or systemic disease.\n8. Patients with inflammatory disease, rheumatoid arthritis or active malignancy.\n9. Patients previously hospitalized for shoulder pain\n10. Patients with upper tubercle fracture\n11. Patients with motor neurological deficit\n12. Pregnant or breastfeeding patient\n13. Patient protected under protective measure","67 Years",{"count":164,"type":21},52,[24],"Kinesiophobia (fear of physical movement) is common after a previous shoulder dislocation and persists after one year, regardless of the occurrence of a recurrence. This kinesiophobia is associated with a lower level of physical activity and a lower return to sport. Increased kinesiophobia, combined with other psychological factors such as depression and fear of re-injury in patients with shoulder instability, results in poor outcomes after treatment. Given that there is currently no postoperative protocol that takes this psychological component into account, a new rehabilitation protocol focused on reducing kinesiophobia was recently designed as part of an international consensus study based on the method Delphi. This protocol includes a core set of evidence-based interventions aimed at regaining functional stability of the shoulder and reducing fear of recurrent dislocation and kinesiophobia. The goal of this study is to determine if we can reduce kinesiophobia in patients who have undergone stabilization surgery for anterior shoulder instability using this new rehabilitation protocol.",[168],"Dislocation Shoulder",[170,171,172,173],"shoulder instability","kinesiophobia","Latarjet","apprehension","2026-03-31",{"date":176,"type":37},"2026-04-06",{"date":178,"type":37},"2023-11-29",{"date":180,"type":21},"2027-05-30",{"name":43,"class":44},""]