[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Samsun University\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":417},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,16,0,[8,49,75,96,116,134,161,187,218,239,257,283,307,330,360,391],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":23,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100650176","role-of-progesterone-membrane-receptors-in-the-pathogenesis-of-preeclampsia-100650176",false,"NCT07745036","Role of Progesterone Membrane Receptors in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia","Investigation of Progesterone Membrane Receptor Expression in Placental Tissue of Women With Preeclampsia and Their Potential Role in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nPreeclampsia Group Women aged 18-45 years Singleton pregnancy Diagnosis of preeclampsia according to ACOG criteria Delivery at the study center Written informed consent Control Group Women aged 18-45 years Singleton pregnancy Normotensive healthy pregnancy Delivery at the study center Written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nAge \\\u003C18 or \\>45 years Multiple gestation Fetal structural or chromosomal anomalies Chronic hypertension Pre-existing diabetes mellitus Autoimmune diseases Renal disease Other major systemic disorders\n\n\\-",true,"FEMALE","18 Years","45 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},90,"ESTIMATED","1 Day","OBSERVATIONAL","Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder and remains a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although abnormal placentation, impaired trophoblast invasion, endothelial dysfunction, and immune dysregulation have been implicated in its pathogenesis, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood.\n\nProgesterone plays a critical role in the maintenance of pregnancy through both classical nuclear receptors and membrane-associated progesterone receptors. Emerging evidence suggests that progesterone membrane receptors, including progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), progesterone receptor membrane component 2 (PGRMC2), and members of the progestin and adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family, may regulate trophoblast invasion, placental development, and inflammatory responses.\n\nThis study aims to compare the placental expression levels of PGRMC1, PGRMC2, and PAQR family receptors between women with preeclampsia and healthy pregnant controls and to investigate their potential role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.",[27,28],"Preeclampsia","Preeclampsia Complications",[30,31,32,33,34,35],"Progesterone Membrane Receptor","PGRMC1","PGRMC2","PAQR","Placenta","Pregnancy","RECRUITING","2026-07-29",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-08-04","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2025-09-01",{"date":44,"type":22},"2027-01-15",{"name":46,"class":47},"Samsun University","OTHER",1,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":58,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":68,"startDateStruct":70,"completionDateStruct":72,"leadSponsor":74,"locationsCount":4},"100646348","ultrasonographic-airway-assessment-and-vidiac-score-100646348","NCT07694154","Ultrasonographic Airway Assessment and VIDIAC Score","Evaluation of the Relationship Between Ultrasonographic Airway Measurements, Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Findings, and the Video Intubation Difficulty Assessment Classification (VIDIAC) Score in Adult Patients: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 to 80 years.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.\n* Patients scheduled for endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.\n* Patients who provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known airway abnormalities.\n* Head and neck tumors.\n* Patients with a tracheostomy.\n* Pregnant patients.\n* Emergency surgical procedures.\n* Patients with limited cervical mobility.\n* Patients with facial trauma.","ALL","80 Years",{"count":59,"type":22},100,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between preoperative ultrasonographic airway measurements and the Video-Intubation Difficulty Assessment Classification (VIDIAC) score in adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. The study will investigate whether airway ultrasound parameters can predict difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation and assess their association with the Cormack-Lehane classification, intubation time, and other airway management outcomes.",[62,63,64,65],"Difficult Airway","Difficult Intubation","Videolaryngoscopic Intubation","Vidiac Score","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-07-17",{"date":69,"type":40},"2026-07-21",{"date":71,"type":22},"2026-06-22",{"date":73,"type":22},"2027-01-22",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":76,"slug":77,"hasResults":11,"nctId":78,"briefTitle":79,"officialTitle":80,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":81,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":85,"conditions":86,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":67,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":90,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":93,"leadSponsor":95,"locationsCount":4},"100646345","comparison-of-i-gel-and-sacovlm-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-100646345","NCT07692139","Comparison of I-gel and SaCoVLM in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","Comparison of Airway Performance Between I-gel and SaCoVLM in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 70 years.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.\n* Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\n* Patients undergoing general anesthesia.\n* Patients who provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n\\-","70 Years",{"count":84,"type":22},80,"This prospective observational study aims to compare the ventilation performance and safety of the i-gel and SaCoVLM supraglottic airway devices in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ventilation-related parameters, airway sealing performance, insertion characteristics, and perioperative complications will be evaluated.",[87,88,89],"Hemodynamic Monitoring","Laryngeal Mask Success Rate","End Tidal Carbon Dioxide",{"date":69,"type":40},{"date":92,"type":22},"2026-06-24",{"date":94,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":97,"slug":98,"hasResults":11,"nctId":99,"briefTitle":100,"officialTitle":101,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":102,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":103,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":104,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":106,"conditions":107,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":109,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":110,"startDateStruct":112,"completionDateStruct":113,"leadSponsor":115,"locationsCount":4},"100646288","airway-ultrasound-and-pediac-score-in-pediatric-patients-100646288","NCT07694167","Airway Ultrasound and PeDiAC Score in Pediatric Patients","Evaluation of the Relationship Between Ultrasonographic Airway Measurements and the PeDiAC Score in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Children aged 1-18 years.\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgery.\n* Patients undergoing endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known craniofacial anomalies.\n* Congenital airway malformations.\n* Restricted cervical mobility.\n* Emergency surgical procedures.\n* Patients with a tracheostomy.\n* Inability to obtain parental or legal guardian consent.","1 Year",{"count":105,"type":22},70,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between preoperative ultrasonographic airway measurements and the Pediatric Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC) score in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. The study will assess whether ultrasound-derived airway parameters are associated with difficult airway characteristics and PeDiAC scores.",[62,63,108],"Airway Assessment","2026-07-02",{"date":111,"type":40},"2026-07-09",{"date":92,"type":22},{"date":114,"type":22},"2027-01-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":117,"slug":118,"hasResults":11,"nctId":119,"briefTitle":120,"officialTitle":121,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":122,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":123,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":125,"conditions":126,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":109,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":129,"startDateStruct":130,"completionDateStruct":131,"leadSponsor":133,"locationsCount":4},"100646279","postoperative-outcomes-of-regional-blocks-in-cervical-disc-surgery-100646279","NCT07694180","Postoperative Outcomes of Regional Blocks in Cervical Disc Surgery","Postoperative Outcomes of Regional Blocks Performed in Cervical Disc Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 18 and 70 years.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III.\n* Patients scheduled for elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery under general anesthesia.\n* Patients who provide written informed consent and agree to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis or those receiving anticoagulant therapy.\n* Patients with a known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioid medications.\n* Patients with infection at the planned block site.\n* Patients with a history of previous cervical spine surgery.\n* Patients with a history of gabapentinoid or corticosteroid use within the last 3 weeks.",{"count":124,"type":22},66,"The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIP block) in patients undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery and to compare the outcomes with those of patients who do not receive regional anesthesia.",[127,128],"Acute Pain","Servical Disc Herniation",{"date":111,"type":40},{"date":71,"type":22},{"date":132,"type":22},"2027-01-02",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":135,"slug":136,"hasResults":11,"nctId":137,"briefTitle":138,"officialTitle":139,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":140,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":141,"targetDuration":143,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":144,"conditions":145,"keywords":149,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":153,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":154,"startDateStruct":156,"completionDateStruct":158,"leadSponsor":160,"locationsCount":48},"100582001","preoperative-hemoglobin-and-acute-kidney-injury-in-emergency-surgery-100582001","NCT06857630","Preoperative Hemoglobin and Acute Kidney Injury in Emergency Surgery","The Association Between Preoperative Hemoglobin and Acute Kidney Injury in Emergency Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients undergoing emergency non-cardiac surgery\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Known renal failure\n* Need for reoperation within 48 hours postoperatively\n* Exit status within 48 hours postoperatively\n* Known hematological disease\n* Known kidney transplantation\n* Urgent surgery planned due to urinary system related diseases\n* Patients who did not accept to participate in the study",{"count":142,"type":22},420,"2 Years","Optimization of hemoglobin levels for organ perfusion is essential, especially in critically ill patients. Although anemia is associated with severe organ failure, especially in coronary artery disease, the effects of blood transfusion or various interventions to increase hemoglobin levels on outcomes continue to be debated. The effects of hemoglobin levels in emergency surgery patients on the development of postoperative AKI have been investigated in a small number of studies in the literature, and clear results have not yet been reported. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of hemoglobin levels on the development of AKI after adjustment for known predictive factors.",[146,147,148],"Emergency Surgery","Acute Kidney Injury","Hemoglobin",[150,151,152,148],"Acute kidney injury","Emergency surgery","Risk factor","2026-03-13",{"date":155,"type":40},"2026-03-17",{"date":157,"type":40},"2025-01-01",{"date":159,"type":22},"2027-05-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":162,"slug":163,"hasResults":11,"nctId":164,"briefTitle":165,"officialTitle":166,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":167,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":168,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":170,"phases":171,"briefSummary":173,"conditions":174,"keywords":177,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":153,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":180,"startDateStruct":182,"completionDateStruct":184,"leadSponsor":186,"locationsCount":48},"100581645","deep-breathing-exercises-and-incentive-spirometry-after-rib-fracture-100581645","NCT06853002","Deep Breathing Exercises and Incentive Spirometry After Rib Fracture","Comparison Between Deep Breathing Exercises and Incentive Spirometry After Rib Fracture","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who developed rib fractures due to thoracic trauma\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who are unconscious\n* Patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma\n* Patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16\n* Patients who require mechanical ventilation",{"count":169,"type":22},104,"INTERVENTIONAL",[172],"NA","Chest trauma patients constitute approximately 10-15% of all traffic accidents. Many complications may occur after chest trauma, including rib fracture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, lung contusion, flail chest, atelectasis, respiratory failure and even death. Atelectasis is the most common of these complications. This study planned to investigate the effects of spirometry and deep breathing exercises on oxygenation after rib fracture.",[175,176],"Rib Fractures","Oxygenation",[175,178,179],"Breathing exercises","Postoperative complications",{"date":181,"type":40},"2026-03-16",{"date":183,"type":40},"2025-02-15",{"date":185,"type":22},"2026-11-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":188,"slug":189,"hasResults":11,"nctId":190,"briefTitle":191,"officialTitle":192,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":193,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":194,"enrollmentInfo":195,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":197,"conditions":198,"keywords":202,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":210,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":211,"startDateStruct":213,"completionDateStruct":215,"leadSponsor":217,"locationsCount":48},"100627224","sensory-analysis-and-cutaneous-mapping-of-different-regional-anesthesia-techniques-100627224","NCT07445854","Sensory Analysis and Cutaneous Mapping of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques","Sensory Analysis and Cutaneous Mapping of Different Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery and who have received a regional anesthesia technique for this purpose.\n* Aged between 18-75 years.\n* Belonging to ASA I-III group.\n* Having provided written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who refuse to participate.\n* Patients who did not receive a block.\n* Patients classified as ASA IV.\n* History of previous abdominal surgery (affecting the laparoscopic approach).\n* Patients with cognitive dysfunction or inability to cooperate.\n* Patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, mania, depression, etc.).\n* Patients who have been using antipsychotic medication for more than 4 weeks.","75 Years",{"count":196,"type":22},40,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate and compare the sensory block distribution and regression patterns of two regional anesthesia techniques - External Oblique Plane Block (EOPB) and Serratus Intercostal Plane Block (SIPB) - in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\n\nThirty adult patients (ASA I-III, BMI ≤ 35 kg\u002Fm², ≥50 kg) scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures will be included, with 20 in each block group. Sensory block areas will be assessed using pinprick test, and dermatomal mapping will visualize the spread. The findings are expected to improve understanding of block behavior and guide multimodal analgesia strategies in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.",[199,200,201],"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","Postoperative Pain Management","Regional Anesthesia",[203,204,205,206,207,208,209],"regional anesthesia","Pain Management","Sensory Mapping","serratus intercostal plane block","external oblique plane block","eopb","sipb","2026-02-25",{"date":212,"type":40},"2026-03-03",{"date":214,"type":40},"2025-11-15",{"date":216,"type":22},"2026-06-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":219,"slug":220,"hasResults":11,"nctId":221,"briefTitle":222,"officialTitle":223,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":224,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":170,"phases":227,"briefSummary":228,"conditions":229,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":231,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":232,"startDateStruct":234,"completionDateStruct":236,"leadSponsor":238,"locationsCount":48},"100619738","comparison-of-the-postoperative-analgesic-efficacy-of-classical-and-modified-erector-spinae-plane-blocks-after-lumbar-spinal-surgery-100619738","NCT07348523","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Classical and Modified Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Spinal Surgery","Comparison of the Effectiveness of Classical and Modified Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-70 years,\n* Classified as ASA physical status I-III,\n* Scheduled to undergo single-level lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia\n* Who agree to participate in the study by providing written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of bleeding diathesis or current anticoagulant therapy\n* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioid medications\n* Infection at the planned block injection site\n* Previous lumbar spine surgery\n* History of gabapentinoid or corticosteroid use within the last 3 weeks\n* Inability to use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device\n* Suspected pregnancy, confirmed pregnancy, or breastfeeding Refusal to undergo the procedure or to participate in the study",{"count":226,"type":22},60,[172],"The investigators aim to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the classical erector spinae plane block and the modified erector spinae plane block in the management of postoperative analgesia after lumbar disc surgery.",[127,230],"Spinal Stenosis Lumbar","2026-02-02",{"date":233,"type":40},"2026-02-03",{"date":235,"type":40},"2025-12-02",{"date":237,"type":22},"2026-08-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":240,"slug":241,"hasResults":11,"nctId":242,"briefTitle":243,"officialTitle":244,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":245,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":246,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":170,"phases":247,"briefSummary":248,"conditions":249,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":231,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":251,"startDateStruct":252,"completionDateStruct":254,"leadSponsor":256,"locationsCount":48},"100619730","quadro-iliac-vs-thoracolumbar-interfascial-plane-block-for-analgesia-after-single-level-lumbar-disc-surgery-100619730","NCT07348419","Quadro-Iliac vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block for Analgesia After Single-Level Lumbar Disc Surgery","Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Quadro-Iliac Plane Block and the Classical Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-70 years,\n* Classified as ASA physical status I-III,\n* Scheduled to undergo single-level lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia\n* Who agree to participate in the study by providing written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* History of bleeding diathesis or current anticoagulant therapy\n* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioid medications\n* Infection at the planned block injection site\n* Previous lumbar spine surgery\n* History of gabapentinoid or corticosteroid use within the last 3 weeks\n* Inability to use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device\n* Suspected pregnancy, confirmed pregnancy, or breastfeeding\n* Refusal to undergo the procedure or to participate in the study",{"count":105,"type":22},[172],"The investigators aim to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the classical thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and the Quadro-iliac plane block for postoperative analgesia management after lumbar disc surgery.",[127,250],"Spinal Stenosis",{"date":233,"type":40},{"date":253,"type":40},"2026-01-06",{"date":255,"type":22},"2026-07-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":258,"slug":259,"hasResults":11,"nctId":260,"briefTitle":261,"officialTitle":262,"acronym":263,"eligibilityCriteria":264,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":265,"enrollmentInfo":266,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":267,"conditions":268,"keywords":269,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":275,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":276,"startDateStruct":278,"completionDateStruct":280,"leadSponsor":282,"locationsCount":48},"100621609","bri-bmi-and-vidac-score-relationship-in-obese-patients-100621609","NCT07372846","BRI, BMI, and VIDAC Score Relationship in Obese Patients","Evaluation of the Correlation Between Body Roundness Index (BRI), Body Mass Index (BMI), and VIDAC Score in Obese Patients: A Prospective Observational Study","BRI-VIDAC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* General anesthesia will be administered\n* Being classified as obese (BMI ≥30)\n* Patient giving informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnancy\n* Emergency surgery\n* Head and neck deformity\n* Inability to measure Mallampati level\n* Patients with tracheostomy\n* Severe hemodynamic instability","65 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},"The VIDIAC score is a measurement system that objectively defines glottic visibility and anatomical complexity in videolaryngoscopy. The literature has shown a relationship between parameters such as BMI, NC, and TMD and difficult airway management in obese patients, but there is no study examining the BRI-VIDIAC relationship.",[65],[270,271,272,273,274],"obesity","vidiac score","videolaryngoscopy","body mass index","Body Roundness Index","2026-01-25",{"date":277,"type":40},"2026-01-28",{"date":279,"type":22},"2026-01-02",{"date":281,"type":22},"2026-06-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":284,"slug":285,"hasResults":11,"nctId":286,"briefTitle":287,"officialTitle":288,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":289,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":290,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":292,"conditions":293,"keywords":295,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":279,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":300,"startDateStruct":302,"completionDateStruct":304,"leadSponsor":306,"locationsCount":48},"100618900","single-dose-preemptive-paracetamol-or-ibuprofen-before-septrorhinoplasty-on-intra--and-postoperative-opioid-consumption-100618900","NCT07337629","Single Dose Preemptive Paracetamol or Ibuprofen Before Septrorhinoplasty on Intra- and Postoperative Opioid Consumption.","Comparison of the Effects of Single Dose Preemptive Paracetamol or Ibuprofen Administration Before Septrorhinoplasty on Intra- and Postoperative Opioid Consumption.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Septorhinoplasty surgery\n* ASA1-2 patients\n* Men and women aged 18-65\n* Informed consent and acceptance to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA 3-4 and under 18 years of age\n* Patients with serious renal, hepatological, cardiovascular, or pulmonary system diseases\n* Allergy to paracetamol or ibuprofen\n* Patients with bleeding diathesis, platelet dysfunction, GI disease, peptic ulcers, pregnancy, planning pregnancy, and breastfeeding mothers\n* Patients using ASA or anticoagulants",{"count":291,"type":22},54,"Reducing intra- and postoperative pain or using less opioids is an essential strategy in today's operations. One emerging and widely used method in this context is the use of preemptive analgesic medication. Paracetamol and ibuprofen used preemptively have been shown to reduce postoperative opioid use and pain scores. There are also studies showing that preemptive analgesia with different analgesic medications reduces opioid consumption and postoperative pain. Our study will evaluate both the intraoperative and postoperative effectiveness of paracetamol and ibupurofen with preemptive analgesia, considering total opioid use. It will also investigate drug side effects and their advantages using a 15-question compilation quality scale, validated in Turkish.",[294],"Analgesia",[296,297,298,299],"SEPTORHİNOPLASTY","PREEMPTİVE","PARACETEMOL","IBUPROFEN",{"date":301,"type":40},"2026-01-13",{"date":303,"type":40},"2025-11-24",{"date":305,"type":22},"2026-11-24",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":308,"slug":309,"hasResults":11,"nctId":310,"briefTitle":311,"officialTitle":312,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":313,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":82,"enrollmentInfo":314,"targetDuration":23,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":316,"conditions":317,"keywords":319,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":322,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":323,"startDateStruct":325,"completionDateStruct":327,"leadSponsor":329,"locationsCount":4},"100612962","comparison-of-sensory-block-coverage-and-clinical-effectiveness-of-tap-and-rectus-sheath-blocks-in-pfannenstiel-incisions-100612962","NCT07260396","Comparison of Sensory Block Coverage and Clinical Effectiveness of TAP and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Pfannenstiel Incisions","Comparison of the Cutaneous Sensory Block Coverage of Surgical Incisions and Clinical Effectiveness of TAP and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Total Abdominal Hysterectomies Performed With a Pfannenstiel Incision: A Prospective Observational Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA physical status I-II-III\n* Patients scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia and who have received either a preoperative rectus sheath block or a transversus abdominis plane block\n* Aged 18-70 years\n* Patients who agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who refuse to participate\n* Patients who have not received any regional anesthesia technique\n* ASA physical status IV\n* Patients in whom unilateral or bilateral sensory spread is not observed following the bilaterally applied regional anesthesia technique\n* Patients who are uncooperative or have cognitive impairment or dementia\n* Patients with psychiatric disorders such as depression, mania, or schizophrenia, or those using antipsychotic medications for more than 4 weeks",{"count":315,"type":22},30,"Hysterectomy is one of the most common major gynecologic surgeries performed for various indications, and hundreds of thousands of procedures are carried out annually, particularly in developed countries. In total abdominal hysterectomies, the Pfannenstiel incision is frequently preferred due to its advantages in terms of aesthetics, functionality, and postoperative recovery. However, this incision can cause significant postoperative pain because of the extensive cutaneous innervation of the lower abdominal wall. This pain may delay early mobilization and negatively affect patient comfort and satisfaction.\n\nAs part of multimodal analgesia strategies, regional anesthesia techniques are widely used in such surgeries to reduce opioid consumption and enhance analgesic efficacy. In this context, the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and the Rectus Sheath Block (RSB) are among the effective techniques targeting the anterior abdominal wall, and various studies have investigated their spread patterns and clinical outcomes. However, data on the extent to which these blocks provide cutaneous sensory coverage of the Pfannenstiel incision remain limited, and direct comparative mapping studies are scarce in the literature.\n\nFor patients undergoing hysterectomy, regional anesthesia techniques are commonly applied perioperatively either as a single technique or in combination for pain management, with TAP and RSB being the most frequently used modalities. In addition, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices are routinely employed as a component of multimodal pain management in this population.\n\nThe aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the cutaneous sensory block areas produced by the TAP and RSB regional anesthesia techniques, their rates of coverage of the Pfannenstiel incision, and their clinical effectiveness.",[204,318],"Hysterectomy",[201,320,321],"Postoperative Pain","Cutaneous Sensory Mapping","2025-11-21",{"date":324,"type":40},"2025-12-03",{"date":326,"type":22},"2026-01-01",{"date":328,"type":22},"2027-07-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":331,"slug":332,"hasResults":11,"nctId":333,"briefTitle":334,"officialTitle":335,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":336,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":337,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":339,"conditions":340,"keywords":346,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":353,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":354,"startDateStruct":356,"completionDateStruct":357,"leadSponsor":359,"locationsCount":48},"100597393","comparison-of-intubation-using-video-laryngeal-mask-and-video-laryngoscope-in-elective-surgical-patients-100597393","NCT07057908","Comparison of Intubation Using Video Laryngeal Mask and Video Laryngoscope in Elective Surgical Patients","A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Tracheal Intubation Via Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Video Laryngoscope in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged 18 years and older\n* Patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures\n* Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I-III\n* Patients undergoing general anesthesia\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 18 years\n* Patients undergoing emergency surgery\n* Patients with difficult airway predictors, such as:\n\nMallampati score ≥ 3\n\nThyromental distance \\\u003C 6 cm\n\nMouth opening \\\u003C 3 cm\n\n* Patients with anatomical abnormalities or surgical history involving the oropharynx, larynx, or airway\n* Patients with conditions contraindicating head or neck manipulation (e.g., cervical instability, upper airway tumors)\n\nPregnant patients",{"count":338,"type":22},176,"This study compares two airway devices that are commonly used during elective surgery: the video laryngeal mask airway (VLM) and the video laryngoscope (VLS). Both are part of routine anesthesia practice. Our main focus is to measure how long intubation takes with each device and to see how successful the intubation is. The study does not involve any extra procedures or risks; everything will be carried out as part of normal patient care.",[341,342,343,344,345],"Airway Management","Tracheal Intubation","Elective Surgeries","Videolaryngoscopy","Anaesthesia",[347,348,349,350,351,352],"Video Laryngoscope","Video Laryngeal Mask Airway","SaCoVLM","Intubation Success Rate","Observational Study","Elective Surgical Patients","2025-08-28",{"date":355,"type":40},"2025-09-05",{"date":42,"type":22},{"date":358,"type":22},"2026-03-02",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":361,"slug":362,"hasResults":11,"nctId":363,"briefTitle":364,"officialTitle":365,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":366,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":265,"enrollmentInfo":367,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":24,"phases":4,"briefSummary":369,"conditions":370,"keywords":374,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":383,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":384,"startDateStruct":386,"completionDateStruct":388,"leadSponsor":390,"locationsCount":48},"100589172","video-laryngeal-mask-vs-endotracheal-tube-in-septoplasty-100589172","NCT06950957","Video Laryngeal Mask vs. Endotracheal Tube in Septoplasty","Comparison of Video Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube Use for Airway Safety in Patients Undergoing Septoplasty","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA I-II classification patients\n* Patients aged 18-65 years undergoing elective septoplasty\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA III-IV classification patients\n* Patients with anticipated difficult airway\n* Patients under 18 years of age\n* History of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or hiatal hernia\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\>30\n* Pregnant patients",{"count":368,"type":22},64,"This randomized controlled trial compares a video laryngeal mask airway (VLMA) and an endotracheal tube (ETT) in adult patients undergoing elective septoplasty. The primary objective is to see which device more effectively prevents surgical blood contamination in the glottic and subglottic regions. The study also assesses perioperative hemodynamic stability, ventilation parameters, and postoperative recovery factors such as sore throat, hoarseness, and overall patient comfort. The findings aim to help determine the optimal airway device choice for nasal surgeries.",[371,372,373],"Airway Complication of Anesthesia","Anesthesia Intubation Complication","Septoplasty",[373,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382],"Laryngeal Mask Airway","Endotracheal Tube","Postoperative Sore Throat","Airway Leak","Otorhinolaryngology Surgery","Supraglottic Airway Devices","Aldrete Score","Postoperative Sore Throat (POST Score)","2025-06-11",{"date":385,"type":40},"2025-06-12",{"date":387,"type":40},"2025-05-30",{"date":389,"type":22},"2025-12-01",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":392,"slug":393,"hasResults":11,"nctId":394,"briefTitle":395,"officialTitle":396,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":397,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":56,"minAge":18,"maxAge":57,"enrollmentInfo":398,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":170,"phases":400,"briefSummary":401,"conditions":402,"keywords":405,"overallStatus":66,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":409,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":410,"startDateStruct":412,"completionDateStruct":414,"leadSponsor":416,"locationsCount":48},"100594528","serratus-posterior-superior-intekcostal-plane-block-vs-serratus-anterior-plane-block-for-postoperative-analgesia-in-vats-a-randomized-trial-100594528","NCT07020624","Serratus Posterior Superior Intekcostal Plane Block vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in VATS: A Randomized Trial\"","Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) on Postoperative Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* BMI \\\u003C 35 kg\u002Fm² Patients with ASA scores I, II, III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who do not want to be included in the study Psychiatric and neurological disease with blurred consciousness Patients with ASA \\> 3 BMI \\> 35 kg\u002Fm² Abnormality in coagulation parameters History of allergy to local anesthetic drugs Infection at the injection site Patients whose surgical procedure time exceeds 150 minutes",{"count":399,"type":22},50,[172],"Thoracotomy is known as one of the most painful surgical procedures, with up to 65% of patients developing chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS), and approximately 10% experiencing pain that significantly impacts quality of life. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become increasingly common over the past decade and offers reduced postoperative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay compared to open thoracotomy. However, VATS can still cause moderate to severe postoperative pain and a high risk of chronic pain. Optimizing analgesia after VATS remains critical. With advances in ultrasound technology, several regional anesthesia techniques such as serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have shown comparable efficacy. In 2023, Tulgar et al. described the serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB), which demonstrated dermatomal coverage from C3 to T10. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of SPSIPB and SAPB in patients undergoing VATS procedures.",[403,404],"Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery","Postoperative Analgesia",[406,407,408],"serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block","Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery","serratus anterior plane block","2025-06-10",{"date":411,"type":40},"2025-06-13",{"date":413,"type":22},"2025-07-01",{"date":415,"type":22},"2026-08-01",{"name":46,"class":47},""]