[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":305},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,10,0,[8,59,95,127,158,178,205,231,256,280],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":34,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":47,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":48,"startDateStruct":51,"completionDateStruct":53,"leadSponsor":55,"locationsCount":58},"100651986","impact-of-video-based-patient-education-on-physician-trust-pain-and-anxiety-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-100651986",false,"NCT07767344","Impact of Video-Based Patient Education on Physician Trust, Pain, and Anxiety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","The Effect of Video-Based Preoperative Patient Education on Physician Trust, Postoperative Pain, and Anxiety Levels in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","VITAP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18-65 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II\n* Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Psychiatric disease\n* Anticoagulant use or coagulopathy\n* Allergy to local anesthetic\n* Infection at the block site\n* Thoracic deformity\n* Inability to comprehend pain or anxiety assessment scales.","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},62,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blind study aims to evaluate the effects of video-based preoperative education on physician trust, postoperative pain, anxiety, and opioid consumption in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Sixty-two ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years will be randomized into two groups: standard verbal information alone or verbal information plus a standardized educational video regarding ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia, and bilateral TAP block. The primary outcome will be physician trust assessed at postoperative 24 hours using the Trust in Physician Scale. Secondary outcomes include preoperative anxiety measured with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesic requirement, and postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence. The study hypothesizes that video-based education will improve physician trust and perioperative patient-centered outcomes.",[28,29,30,31,32,33],"Postoperative Pain","Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery","Preoperative Anxiety","Trust in Healthcare System","Regional Anesthesia","Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP Block)",[35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45],"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy","TAP block","Video-based education","Preoperative education","Trust in Physician Scale","APAIS","Preoperative anxiety","Postoperative pain","Multimodal analgesia","Patient-centered outcomes","Randomized controlled trial","RECRUITING","2026-08-16",{"date":49,"type":50},"2026-08-18","ACTUAL",{"date":52,"type":50},"2026-08-12",{"date":54,"type":22},"2026-10-13",{"name":56,"class":57},"Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":60,"slug":61,"hasResults":11,"nctId":62,"briefTitle":63,"officialTitle":64,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":65,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":66,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":67,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":69,"briefSummary":71,"conditions":72,"keywords":79,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":47,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":89,"startDateStruct":90,"completionDateStruct":92,"leadSponsor":94,"locationsCount":58},"100649737","phase-4-routine-antiemetic-prophylaxis-for-nonfasted-parturients-undergoing-cesarean-sections-under-spinal-anesthesia-100649737","NCT07740577","Routine Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Nonfasted Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anesthesia","Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Antiemetic Prophylaxis in Nonfasted Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant women scheduled for emergency cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia\n* Non-fasted (full-stomach) parturients\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Singleton pregnancy\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA physical status III or higher\n* Refusal to participate\n* Elective cesarean delivery (non-emergency cases)\n* Preoperative antiemetic use within 24 hours before surgery\n* Known allergy or contraindication to study drugs (ondansetron or metoclopramide)\n* Pre-existing gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., severe GERD, gastroparesis, bowel obstruction)\n* Psychiatric illness or current use of psychotropic medications\n* Preoperative anemia (as defined by institutional threshold, e.g., Hb \\\u003C 10 g\u002FdL)\n* Intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia\n* Massive intraoperative hemorrhage (\\>1000-1500 mL or requiring transfusion, depending on your protocol definition)\n* Intraoperative administration of additional sedative or antiemetic agents outside study protocol\n* Multiple gestation pregnancies","FEMALE",{"count":68,"type":22},100,[70],"PHASE4","The aim of this prospective randomized double-blind study is to compare the effectiveness of routine antiemetic prophylaxis for the prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) in non-fasted parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.\n\nNausea and vomiting are common complications during cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia and may negatively affect maternal comfort and perioperative safety. The incidence of these symptoms may be particularly increased in emergency cesarean sections involving non-fasted (full-stomach) parturients. This study compares two commonly used antiemetic strategies, namely 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists and dopamine receptor antagonists, to determine their relative effectiveness in preventing IONV during surgery.\n\nThe findings are expected to contribute to optimization of antiemetic prophylaxis protocols, improvement of maternal comfort, and reduction of perioperative complications associated with nausea and vomiting during emergency cesarean delivery.",[73,74,75,76,77,78],"Intraoperative Nausea-retching-vomiting Episodes","Spinal Aneshtesia","Ceserean Section","Antiemetic Therapy","Ondansetron","Metoclopramide",[80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88],"Cesarean Section","Emergency Cesarean Delivery","Non-fasted Parturients","Full Stomach","Spinal Anesthesia","Antiemetic Prophylaxis","Intraoperative Nausea and Vomiting","Obstetric Anesthesia","Maternal Outcomes",{"date":49,"type":50},{"date":91,"type":50},"2026-07-30",{"date":93,"type":22},"2027-01-02",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":96,"slug":97,"hasResults":11,"nctId":98,"briefTitle":99,"officialTitle":100,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":101,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":102,"enrollmentInfo":103,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":105,"briefSummary":106,"conditions":107,"keywords":109,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":118,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":119,"startDateStruct":121,"completionDateStruct":123,"leadSponsor":125,"locationsCount":126},"100652424","patient-understanding-of-informed-consent-in-interventional-pain-procedures-100652424","NCT07772843","Patient Understanding of Informed Consent in Interventional Pain Procedures","Evaluation of Patient Understanding of Informed Consent Before Interventional Pain Procedures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 18 to 85 years.\n* Patients scheduled to undergo an eligible interventional pain procedure included in the approved study protocol.\n* Ability to read, understand, and communicate in Turkish.\n* Ability to understand the study information and provide written informed consent for participation.\n* Willingness to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age below 18 years or above 85 years.\n* Severe cognitive impairment, mental incapacity, or any condition that prevents reliable understanding of the consent information or completion of the teach-back assessment.\n* Severe hearing or visual impairment that prevents the participant from receiving or understanding the study information, unless adequately corrected.\n* Active psychiatric illness or acute psychiatric episode that may affect comprehension, communication, or voluntary consent.\n* Emergency clinical condition requiring immediate intervention.\n* Inability or unwillingness to complete the teach-back assessment.\n* Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent for participation.","85 Years",{"count":104,"type":22},360,[25],"This multicenter randomized controlled study will evaluate whether simplified and visually supported procedure-specific information cards improve patients' understanding of informed consent before selected interventional pain procedures. Adult patients scheduled for an eligible procedure will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a control group or an intervention group. All participants will receive the routine verbal explanation and the standard institution-approved informed consent form for the planned procedure. Participants in the intervention group will additionally receive an ethics committee-approved simplified and visually supported information card related to the planned procedure. Participants in the control group will not receive the additional information card. After the information and consent process, patient understanding will be assessed using a standardized teach-back form before the clinical procedure. The study will compare understanding between the two groups.",[108],"Patient Understanding of Informed Consent Before Interventional Pain Procedures",[110,111,112,113,114,115,116],"Informed Consent","Patient Understanding","Teach-Back","Interventional Pain Procedures","Patient Education","Simplified Information Materials","Visual Information Materials","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-08-14",{"date":120,"type":50},"2026-08-19",{"date":122,"type":22},"2026-08-17",{"date":124,"type":22},"2026-12",{"name":56,"class":57},3,{"id":128,"slug":129,"hasResults":11,"nctId":130,"briefTitle":131,"officialTitle":132,"acronym":133,"eligibilityCriteria":134,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":135,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":137,"briefSummary":138,"conditions":139,"keywords":142,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":151,"startDateStruct":153,"completionDateStruct":155,"leadSponsor":157,"locationsCount":4},"100645724","ai-assisted-written-information-in-symptomatic-hemorrhoidal-disease-100645724","NCT07701798","AI-Assisted Written Information in Symptomatic Hemorrhoidal Disease","Effect of AI-Assisted Written Patient Information on Medical Treatment Adherence and Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Symptomatic Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","HD-AI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age 18 years or older\n2. Diagnosis of symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease in the outpatient clinic\n3. Conservative\u002Fmedical treatment planned at first evaluation\n4. Ability to read and understand Turkish\n5. Reachable by telephone\n6. Provision of written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Planned office procedure or surgery\n2. Emergency conditions such as thrombosed external hemorrhoid, strangulation, or massive bleeding\n3. Concomitant anal fissure, anal fistula, perianal abscess, inflammatory bowel disease, or suspicion of anal\u002Fcolorectal malignancy\n4. History of hemorrhoidal intervention or surgery within the last 3 months\n5. Severe cognitive impairment, severe visual problem, or communication barrier\n6. Pregnancy and postpartum period\n7. Serious systemic conditions that would prevent completion of study follow-up",{"count":136,"type":22},220,[25],"This single-center, prospective, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial compares standardized verbal counseling with AI-assisted written patient information in adults with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease receiving initial conservative\u002Fmedical treatment. The primary objective is to determine whether AI-assisted written information improves complete treatment adherence at day 14. Secondary objectives include quality-of-life change, Patient Global Impression of Change, time to symptom improvement, change in pain\u002Fdiscomfort scores, change in bleeding, swelling, itching, and soiling symptoms, and unplanned repeat healthcare visits.",[140,141],"Symptomatic Hemorrhoidal Disease","Hemorrhoids Grade I and II",[143,144,145,146,147,148,149],"Hemorrhoidal disease","Hemorrhoids","Treatment adherence","AI-assisted patient information","HEMO-FISS-QoL","PGI-C","Conservative treatment","2026-07-08",{"date":152,"type":50},"2026-07-14",{"date":154,"type":22},"2026-07-15",{"date":156,"type":22},"2026-12-31",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":159,"slug":160,"hasResults":11,"nctId":161,"briefTitle":162,"officialTitle":163,"acronym":164,"eligibilityCriteria":165,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":166,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":167,"briefSummary":168,"conditions":169,"keywords":171,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":174,"startDateStruct":175,"completionDateStruct":176,"leadSponsor":177,"locationsCount":4},"100645585","ai-assisted-written-information-in-chronic-anal-fissure-100645585","NCT07701811","AI-Assisted Written Information in Chronic Anal Fissure","Effect of AI-Assisted Written Patient Information on Medical Treatment Adherence and Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Chronic Anal Fissure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","AF-AI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age 18 years or older\n2. Clinical diagnosis of primary chronic anal fissure\n3. Initial medical\u002Fconservative treatment planned at first evaluation\n4. Ability to read and understand Turkish\n5. Reachable by telephone\n6. Provision of written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Acute anal fissure\n2. Suspicion or diagnosis of secondary fissure (including Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, HIV-related lesion, suspected malignancy, or atypical lateral fissure)\n3. Planned botulinum toxin, surgery, or another interventional treatment\n4. History of botulinum toxin or surgical treatment for anal fissure within the last 6 months\n5. Concomitant perianal abscess, fistula, advanced hemorrhoidal disease, or another significant anorectal pathology\n6. Pregnancy and early postpartum period",{"count":136,"type":22},[25],"This single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group controlled superiority trial compares standard verbal counseling with AI-assisted written patient information in adults with primary chronic anal fissure receiving initial medical\u002Fconservative treatment. The primary objective is to determine whether AI-assisted written information improves complete treatment adherence at day 14. Secondary objectives include pain and discomfort outcomes, Patient Global Impression of Change, HEMO-FISS-QoL change, stool form change, additional healthcare visits, transition to interventional treatment, and patient satisfaction.",[170],"Chronic Anal Fissure",[172,173,145,146,147,148,149],"Anal fissure","Chronic anal fissure",{"date":152,"type":50},{"date":154,"type":22},{"date":156,"type":22},{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":179,"slug":180,"hasResults":11,"nctId":181,"briefTitle":182,"officialTitle":183,"acronym":184,"eligibilityCriteria":185,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":186,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":188,"briefSummary":189,"conditions":190,"keywords":193,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":200,"startDateStruct":201,"completionDateStruct":202,"leadSponsor":204,"locationsCount":4},"100645429","laser-versus-crystallized-phenol-in-pilonidal-sinus-disease-100645429","NCT07701772","LASER VERSUS CRYSTALLIZED PHENOL IN PILONIDAL SINUS DISEASE","A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF LASER ABLATION AND CRYSTALLIZED PHENOL APPLICATION IN PRIMARY UNCOMPLICATED SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL SINUS DISEASE","PSD-L-F","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Diagnosis of primary chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease\n* Uncomplicated disease\n* Suitability for minimally invasive treatment\n* Provision of written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Acute pilonidal abscess\n* History of pilonidal abscess drainage\n* Previous surgical or interventional treatment for pilonidal sinus disease\n* Recurrent pilonidal disease\n* Complex pilonidal disease or marked lateral extension\n* Immunosuppression, chronic steroid use, or systemic conditions that may significantly impair wound healing\n* Inability to attend regular follow-up\n* Refusal to participate in the study",{"count":187,"type":22},120,[25],"This single-center prospective randomized parallel-group trial compares laser ablation and crystallized phenol application in adults with primary uncomplicated sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. The primary objective is to compare postoperative day 1 pain intensity between the two treatment methods. Secondary objectives include complete epithelialization by day 30, time to complete epithelialization, postoperative day 7 pain, duration of analgesic use, time to return to daily activities and work, early local complications, and 6-month recurrence.",[191,192],"Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease","Pilonidal Sinus Disease",[194,195,196,197,42,198,199],"Pilonidal sinus disease","Laser ablation","Crystallized phenol","Randomized trial","Recurrence","Complete epithelialization",{"date":152,"type":50},{"date":154,"type":22},{"date":203,"type":22},"2027-03-01",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":206,"slug":207,"hasResults":11,"nctId":208,"briefTitle":209,"officialTitle":210,"acronym":211,"eligibilityCriteria":212,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":213,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":215,"phases":4,"briefSummary":216,"conditions":217,"keywords":220,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":150,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":224,"startDateStruct":226,"completionDateStruct":228,"leadSponsor":230,"locationsCount":58},"100632980","clinical-outcomes-after-laser-hemorrhoidoplasty-100632980","NCT07520734","Clinical Outcomes After Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty","Clinical Outcomes, Pain Scores, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: A Prospective Observational Study","LHP","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Symptomatic internal hemorrhoidal disease\n* Scheduled to undergo laser hemorrhoidoplasty\n* Willingness to participate and provision of informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Grade IV hemorrhoidal disease\n* Acute thrombosed hemorrhoids\n* Additional anorectal pathology such as anal fissure, fistula, or perianal abscess\n* History of inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal malignancy\n* Previous major anal surgery'",{"count":214,"type":22},60,"OBSERVATIONAL","This single-center prospective observational study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes, postoperative pain scores, complications, and patient satisfaction in adults undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty for symptomatic internal hemorrhoidal disease. Additional objectives are to assess the relationship between hemorrhoid stage, dominant presenting symptoms, operative technical details, and postoperative outcomes. No study-specific intervention beyond routine clinical care and follow-up will be performed.",[218,219],"Hemorrhoidal Disease","Internal Hemorrhoids",[221,143,222,223],"Laser hemorrhoidoplasty","Patient satisfaction","Visual Analog Scale",{"date":225,"type":50},"2026-07-09",{"date":227,"type":50},"2026-06-01",{"date":229,"type":22},"2027-04-01",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":232,"slug":233,"hasResults":11,"nctId":234,"briefTitle":235,"officialTitle":235,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":236,"healthyVolunteers":237,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":238,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":240,"briefSummary":241,"conditions":242,"keywords":246,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":248,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":249,"startDateStruct":251,"completionDateStruct":253,"leadSponsor":255,"locationsCount":58},"100635022","comparison-of-the-effects-of-external-oblique-intercostal-plane-block-and-subcostal-transversus-plane-block-methods-with-ultrasound-guidance-on-postoperative-analgesia-in-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy-operations-100635022","NCT07547280","Comparison of the Effects of External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block and Subcostal Transversus Plane Block Methods With Ultrasound Guidance on Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Operations","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged between 18 and 65 years\n* Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients younger than 18 years or older than 65 years\n* Inability to cooperate or comply with study procedures\n* Liver and kidney failure\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV-V patient\n* External oblique intercostal block(EOİB) and the Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane block(s-TAB) are contraindicated",true,{"count":239,"type":22},90,[25],"The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the external oblique intercostal plane block and the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.",[243,244,245],"Sleeve Gastrectomy","External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block","Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block",[247],"Ultrasound guided · External oblique intercostal plane block · Sleeve gastrectomy Bariatric surgery Postoperative · Analgesia","2026-04-20",{"date":250,"type":50},"2026-04-23",{"date":252,"type":22},"2026-04-01",{"date":254,"type":22},"2027-05-01",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":257,"slug":258,"hasResults":11,"nctId":259,"briefTitle":260,"officialTitle":261,"acronym":262,"eligibilityCriteria":263,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":264,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":215,"phases":4,"briefSummary":266,"conditions":267,"keywords":269,"overallStatus":46,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":273,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":274,"startDateStruct":275,"completionDateStruct":277,"leadSponsor":279,"locationsCount":58},"100631134","comparison-of-diagnostic-methods-in-patients-operated-for-suspected-appendicitis-100631134","NCT07496723","Comparison of Diagnostic Methods in Patients Operated for Suspected Appendicitis","Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of Computed Tomography Reporting and AIR Scoring System on Negative Appendectomy Rates in Patients With Acute Appendicitis","APP-AIR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Presentation to the emergency department with suspected acute appendicitis\n* Underwent computed tomography after clinical evaluation\n* Computed tomography report compatible with acute appendicitis\n* Underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis\n* Provided informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age younger than 18 years\n* Pregnancy\n* Planned additional surgical intervention in the same session for a reason other than appendicitis\n* Intraoperative finding of a non-appendiceal pathology requiring a different surgical procedure\n* Refusal to participate in the study",{"count":265,"type":22},200,"Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies, but diagnostic uncertainty may still lead to unnecessary appendectomy in some patients. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) reporting and the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score in adult patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. The primary objective is to determine the negative appendectomy rate based on final histopathology. Secondary objectives are to assess the agreement between AIR score, CT findings, intraoperative severity grading, and pathology results, and to explore diagnostic performance across patient subgroups. No study-specific intervention beyond routine clinical care will be performed.",[268],"Acute Appendicitis",[270,271,272],"Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score","Appendectomy","Computed Tomography","2026-03-26",{"date":252,"type":50},{"date":276,"type":50},"2026-03-18",{"date":278,"type":22},"2027-01-31",{"name":56,"class":57},{"id":281,"slug":282,"hasResults":11,"nctId":283,"briefTitle":284,"officialTitle":285,"acronym":286,"eligibilityCriteria":287,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":66,"minAge":18,"maxAge":288,"enrollmentInfo":289,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":290,"briefSummary":291,"conditions":292,"keywords":294,"overallStatus":117,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":298,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":299,"startDateStruct":301,"completionDateStruct":302,"leadSponsor":304,"locationsCount":4},"100580733","prediction-of-adhesion-by-sliding-sign-100580733","NCT06841146","Prediction of Adhesion by Sliding Sign","Prediction of Adhesion by Sliding Sign in Three or Above Cesarean Section","Prediction","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* all three and above number of cesarean section patients\n\nExclusion Criteria: placenta adhesion spectrum\n\n\\-","50 Years",{"count":68,"type":22},[25],"Sliding sign will be checked by ultrasonography by transabdominal and transvaginal route before operation of patients that had cesarean section three or more. During cesarean section adhesions will be evaluated and noted. The correlation and predictive values of adhesion and sliding sign will be defined in our study.",[293],"Adhesions Abdominal",[295,296,297],"adhesion","cesarean section","sliding sign","2025-02-19",{"date":300,"type":50},"2025-02-24",{"date":298,"type":22},{"date":303,"type":22},"2025-03-31",{"name":56,"class":57},""]