[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Taksim Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":127},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,4,0,[8,47,77,102],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100648132","pericapsular-nerve-group-block-versus-femoral-nerve-block-study-100648132",false,"NCT07717463","Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block Study","Comparison of Preoperative Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Optimizing Spinal Anaesthesia in Proximal Femur Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults aged 50 years or older.\n* Diagnosis of proximal femoral fracture.\n* Scheduled to undergo surgical repair under spinal anesthesia.\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.\n* Able to provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent.\n* Coagulopathy or contraindication to spinal anesthesia or peripheral nerve block.\n* Local infection at the planned injection site.\n* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.\n* Pre-existing neurological disease affecting lower extremity function or sensory assessment.\n* Cognitive impairment preventing reliable study participation or outcome assessment.\n* Previous lumbar spine surgery.\n* Polytrauma.\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\\u003C18 kg\u002Fm² or \\>40 kg\u002Fm².\n* Current anticoagulant therapy that precludes neuraxial anesthesia or peripheral nerve block according to institutional practice.","ALL","50 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},110,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","Hip fractures are common in older adults and are often associated with severe pain, making it difficult for patients to sit for spinal anesthesia before surgery. Peripheral nerve blocks may improve pain control and facilitate patient positioning, but it remains uncertain whether the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block provides advantages over the traditional femoral nerve block during the spinal anesthesia procedure.",[26],"Hip Fractures",[28,29,30,31,32,33],"Hip Fracture","Pericapsular Nerve Group Block","Femoral Nerve Block","Regional Anesthesia","Spinal Anesthesia","Hemodynamic Stability","RECRUITING","2026-07-29",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-07-31","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":38},"2026-07-22",{"date":42,"type":20},"2026-12-22",{"name":44,"class":45},"Taksim Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi","OTHER_GOV",2,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":56,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":58,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":62,"overallStatus":67,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":68,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":69,"startDateStruct":71,"completionDateStruct":73,"leadSponsor":75,"locationsCount":76},"100646816","erector-spinae-plane-block-versus-infraspinatus-teres-minor-interfascial-plane-block-for-analgesia-after-shoulder-arthroscopy-100646816","NCT07688395","Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraspinatus-Teres Minor Interfascial Plane Block for Analgesia After Shoulder Arthroscopy","Novel Analgesic Approaches in Shoulder Surgery: Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraspinatus-Teres Minor Interfascial Plane Block","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy\n* ASA I-II-III patients\n* Patients age between 18-80\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with previously known allergy to local anesthetics.\n* Patients with insufficient pulmonary functions (Severe obstruction or restriction in Pulmonary Function Test)\n* Patients with ASA IV or higher\n* Patients who suffered from any complications related to anesthesia or surgery\n* Patients with additional body part injury\n* Pregnant or breastfeeding women","18 Years","80 Years",{"count":57,"type":20},100,[23],"The shoulder, being an anatomical region innervated by different nerves, has a wide variety of analgesic approaches, which differ depending on the practitioner. New approaches are being developed based on the different innervation channels demonstrated in clinical and cadaver studies. Over time, the effectiveness of axillary block, suprascapular block, interscalene block, local infiltration, and various combinations, as well as non-regional methods, has been observed. The goal of these approaches is to achieve the highest possible level of patient comfort, high analgesic efficacy, and minimal complications. Studies have shown that the interscalene block has the highest analgesic efficacy and the most ideal postoperative results; therefore, it is frequently used as the gold standard in this field. Providing effective analgesia with a single intervention can also be cited as an aspect that increases patient comfort and simplifies the procedure. In interscalene block; unilateral transient diaphragmatic paralysis due to the spread of local anesthetics to the C7 nerve root, respiratory problems and potential spinal\u002Fepidural complications, new approaches are being followed and researched. Results from cervical\u002Fhigh thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial plane block (ITMIPB) studies, which are the subject of new studies, strengthen the hypothesis that they provide effective analgesia. Neither of these blocks, performed with ultrasonography, carries the risks present in interscalene block. Although the usual risks of a peripheral nerve block are present for these procedures; the block sites are considered safer due to its distance from vascular structures and the reduced risk of additional complications. While small sample studies exist for each type of block, no studies comparing their effectiveness have been found. Besides reduced complications, another advantage of these two blocks is their ability to provide effective analgesia with a single-point injection. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of Cervical Erector Spine Plane Block (ESP) and Infraspinatus-Teres Minor Interfascial Plane Block (ITMIPB) applied for postoperative analgesia in ASA I-III patients undergoing shoulder surgery.",[61],"Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgery",[63,64,65,66],"postoperative analgesia","regional anesthesia","shoulder arthroscopy","ultrasonography","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-07-02",{"date":70,"type":38},"2026-07-07",{"date":72,"type":20},"2026-07-01",{"date":74,"type":20},"2027-07-01",{"name":44,"class":45},1,{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":54,"maxAge":55,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":86,"phases":4,"briefSummary":87,"conditions":88,"keywords":90,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":95,"startDateStruct":97,"completionDateStruct":99,"leadSponsor":101,"locationsCount":76},"100643474","non-pharmacological-factors-on-spinal-block-duration-100643474","NCT07638280","Non-Pharmacological Factors on Spinal Block Duration","Analysis of Non-pharmacological Factors on Spinal Anaesthesia Block Duration","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-80 years\n* ASA physical status I-III\n* Patients scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient refusal to participate\n* Coagulopathy\n* Use of medications or substances known to impair coagulation\n* Pregnancy, sepsis\n* Shock\n* Severe aortic or mitral regurgitation\n* Peripheral vascular disease\n* Increased intracranial pressure\n* Mental disorders\n* Spinal column deformity\n* History of previous spinal surgery.",{"count":85,"type":20},140,"OBSERVATIONAL","The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of non-pharmacological factors-such as age, sex, body mass index, paraspinal muscle mass, vertebral canal anatomy, patient positioning, and injection technique-on the duration of sensory and motor block in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, and to investigate the potential relationships between these factors and block duration.",[89],"Paraspinal Muscle Mass and Spinal Anaesthesia",[91,92,93],"anaesthesia","spinal anaesthesia","ultrasound","2026-06-18",{"date":96,"type":38},"2026-06-23",{"date":98,"type":38},"2026-06-16",{"date":100,"type":20},"2026-12-16",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":107,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":54,"maxAge":109,"enrollmentInfo":110,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":112,"briefSummary":113,"conditions":114,"keywords":117,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":94,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":123,"completionDateStruct":124,"leadSponsor":126,"locationsCount":76},"100641919","erector-spinae-plane-block-and-low-flow-anaesthesia-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-100641919","NCT07653490","Erector Spinae Plane Block and Low-Flow Anaesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","Evaluation of the Effects of Preoperative Erector Spinae Plane Block Combined With Low-Flow Anaesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery and Opioid Consumption: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged 18-65 years\n* ASA physical status I-II\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\\u003C35 kg\u002Fm²\n* Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy\n* Ability to provide written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders\n* Allergy to local anaesthetic agents\n* Infection at the block application site\n* Neurological or psychiatric disorders\n* Communication difficulties\n* Chronic opioid or analgesic use\n* Reoperation cases\n* Acute cholecystitis\n* Conversion to open surgery\n* Inadequate dermatomal block after ESPB\n* Severe intraoperative hemodynamic instability\n* Intraoperative blood loss ≥250 mL\n* Development of allergic reactions or major complications during follow-up","65 Years",{"count":111,"type":20},72,[23],"This prospective randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of preoperative ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block combined with low-flow anaesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery and opioid consumption in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study will compare postoperative recovery quality, pain scores, analgesic requirements, and perioperative outcomes between patients receiving ESP block with low-flow anaesthesia and those receiving standard anaesthetic management.",[115,116],"Postoperative Pain","Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy",[118,119,120,121,116],"Erector Spinae Plane Block","Low-Flow Anaesthesia","Opioid Consumption","Enhanced Recovery",{"date":96,"type":38},{"date":94,"type":38},{"date":125,"type":20},"2027-06-18",{"name":44,"class":45},""]