[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Trabzon Kanuni Education and Research Hospital\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":149},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,49,77,97,122],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":37,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":38,"startDateStruct":41,"completionDateStruct":43,"leadSponsor":45,"locationsCount":48},"100651653","clinical-evaluation-of-the-pelvic-floor-fatigue-index-pffi-100651653",false,"NCT07763613","Clinical Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor Fatigue Index (PFFI)","Development and Clinical Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor Fatigue Index (PFFI): A Prospective Observational Study","PFFI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAdults aged 18-65 years. Diagnosis of urolithiasis requiring ureteroscopy (URS) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).\n\nPlanned postoperative double-J ureteral stent placement. Patients belonging to either the Non-pre-stented Group or the Pre-stented Group according to the study protocol.\n\nAbility to read and understand the validated Turkish version of the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ).\n\nAbility to independently complete the USSQ. Ability to perform an adequate voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction. Provision of written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nClinically significant diabetic neuropathy. Neurological disorders affecting lower urinary tract function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury).\n\nActive lower urinary tract dysfunction (e.g., overactive bladder, neurogenic bladder, interstitial cystitis).\n\nPrevious pelvic floor surgery. Known urinary incontinence. Urethral stricture. Chronic prostatitis. Recurrent urinary tract infection. Urinary tract malignancy. Advanced chronic kidney disease. Previous upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery. Pregnancy. Active urinary tract infection. Inability to perform an adequate voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction. Inability to provide informed consent.","ALL","18 Years","65 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},75,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","Background:\n\nUreteral stent-related symptoms vary considerably among patients despite similar surgical procedures and stent characteristics. Although several mechanisms have been proposed, the reasons for this interindividual variability remain incompletely understood. Pelvic floor muscle endurance may represent one of the patient-related factors contributing to symptom severity.\n\nThe Pelvic Floor Fatigue Index (PFFI) is a novel ultrasound-based index developed to quantify pelvic floor muscle endurance by measuring the percentage decline in bladder base elevation during a sustained maximum voluntary pelvic floor contraction using suprapubic transverse B-mode ultrasonography.\n\nThis prospective observational study aims to clinically evaluate the PFFI by investigating the association between preoperative PFFI measurements and postoperative ureteral stent-related symptoms assessed using the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ). In addition, the study will evaluate the test-retest reliability of the PFFI measurement method and explore its potential role as an objective functional assessment tool for pelvic floor muscle endurance.\n\nThe findings of this study are expected to provide the first clinical evaluation of the PFFI and establish the methodological basis for future validation studies and broader clinical applications.",[26],"Urolithiasis",[28,15,29,30,31,32,33,26,34,35],"Pelvic Floor Fatigue Index","Ureteral Stent","Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms","Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire","USSQ","Pelvic Floor Muscle Endurance","Ureteroscopy","Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery","RECRUITING","2026-08-16",{"date":39,"type":40},"2026-08-18","ACTUAL",{"date":42,"type":40},"2026-08-13",{"date":44,"type":22},"2026-12-25",{"name":46,"class":47},"Trabzon Kanuni Education and Research Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":50,"slug":51,"hasResults":11,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":55,"healthyVolunteers":56,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":59,"conditions":60,"keywords":65,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":70,"startDateStruct":72,"completionDateStruct":74,"leadSponsor":76,"locationsCount":48},"100647645","association-between-pain-catastrophizing-and-ponv-in-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-patients-100647645","NCT07712211","Association Between Pain Catastrophizing and PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients","The Relationship Between Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients aged 18-65 years\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II-III\n* Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy\n* Able to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C18 or \\>65 years\n* Emergency surgery\n* ASA physical status \\> III\n* Pregnancy\n* Chronic opioid use\n* Known drug allergy\n* Psychiatric disorders\n* Neurological diseases (central or peripheral neuropathy)\n* History of cerebrovascular disease (stroke)\n* Chronic renal disease\n* Chronic pulmonary disease\n* Patients who refuse to participate",true,{"count":58,"type":22},64,"This study aims to explore whether patients' tendency to exaggerate or focus on pain (pain catastrophizing) is related to experiencing nausea and vomiting after surgery. The study will include patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Before surgery, patients will answer questions measuring pain catastrophizing and rate their pain during intravenous cannulation. Nausea and vomiting will be assessed at various times during the first 24 hours after surgery. The results may help better understand how psychological factors affect postoperative symptoms.",[61,62,63,64],"Vomiting, Postoperative","Pain","Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative","Pain Catastrophizing",[66,67,68],"The Pain Catastrophizing Scale","Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting","Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","2026-07-14",{"date":71,"type":40},"2026-07-17",{"date":73,"type":40},"2026-01-15",{"date":75,"type":22},"2027-04",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":78,"slug":79,"hasResults":11,"nctId":80,"briefTitle":81,"officialTitle":82,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":83,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":84,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":89,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":69,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":91,"startDateStruct":92,"completionDateStruct":94,"leadSponsor":96,"locationsCount":48},"100647527","al-prediction-of-sarcopenia-risk-in-neurocritical-icu-patients-100647527","NCT07712198","Al Prediction of Sarcopenia Risk in Neurocritical ICU Patients","Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Sarcopenia Risk in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Intracranial Pathology","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age between 18 and 65 years\n* Admission to the intensive care unit due to intracranial pathology (intracerebral hemorrhage, epidural hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial tumors, or ischemic stroke)\n* Informed consent obtained from the patient or legally authorized representative\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C18 years or \\>65 years\n* Failure to achieve nutritional targets according to ESPEN guidelines\n* Palliative care or home care patients\n* Morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg\u002Fm²)\n* History of neuromuscular disease\n* Lower extremity amputation\n* History of trauma affecting the thigh region\n* Pregnancy",{"count":85,"type":22},100,"This prospective observational study aims to evaluate sarcopenia in intensive care patients with intracranial pathologies using ultrasound and to compare the predictive performance of different artificial intelligence models. Rectus femoris muscle thickness will be measured by ultrasound on ICU admission (Day 0) and Day 7. Prealbumin levels will be assessed on Days 0, 3, and 7, and the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score will be calculated on the first day of ICU admission. Clinical, laboratory, and ultrasonographic data will be integrated into different artificial intelligence models to predict sarcopenia status on Day 7. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in the early identification of sarcopenia and to support future clinical decision-making in intensive care practice.",[88],"Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Subdural Hematoma, Epidural Hematoma, Ischemic Stroke, Brain Neoplasms",[90],"Sarcopenia, Artificial Intelligence, Intensive Care Unit, Rectus Femoris, Ultrasonography, mNUTRIC, Prealbumin, Intracranial Pathology",{"date":71,"type":40},{"date":93,"type":40},"2026-01-01",{"date":95,"type":22},"2026-08-30",{"name":46,"class":47},{"id":98,"slug":99,"hasResults":11,"nctId":100,"briefTitle":101,"officialTitle":102,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":103,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":104,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":4,"briefSummary":106,"conditions":107,"keywords":111,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":113,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":114,"startDateStruct":116,"completionDateStruct":118,"leadSponsor":120,"locationsCount":121},"100635167","ivc-collapsibility-index-in-lumbar-stabilization-surgery-100635167","NCT07549165","IVC Collapsibility Index in Lumbar Stabilization Surgery","Hemodynamic Assessment Using the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years\n* Patients classified as ASA physical status I-II-III\n* Patients scheduled for elective lumbar spine stabilization surgery under general anesthesia\n* Ability to obtain adequate inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasonographic imaging\n* Provision of written informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age younger than 18 years\n\n  * Emergency surgery\n  * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV\n  * Patients undergoing revision lumbar stabilization surgery\n  * Baseline systolic blood pressure \\>180 mmHg or \\\u003C90 mmHg\n  * Heart failure with ejection fraction (EF) \\\u003C40%\n  * Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) \\>40 mmHg\n  * Presence of intra-abdominal mass, ascites, or increased intra-abdominal pressure\n  * Body mass index (BMI) \\>30 kg\u002Fm²\n  * Pregnancy\n  * Patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders\n  * Inability to obtain adequate inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasonographic imaging\n  * Refusal to provide written informed consent",{"count":105,"type":22},128,"This study aims to evaluate perioperative hemodynamic changes using the inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index in patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery under general anesthesia. The IVC diameter and collapsibility index will be measured using ultrasonography at predefined perioperative time points. Hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate will also be recorded. The study seeks to determine whether the IVC collapsibility index can be used as a non-invasive indicator of intravascular volume status and hemodynamic changes during lumbar spine surgery.",[108,109,110],"Lumbar Spine Surgery","Hemodynamic Changes","Intravascular Volume Status",[112],"Inferior Vena Cava • IVC Collapsibility Index • Lumbar Stabilization Surgery • Hemodynamic Monitoring","2026-04-17",{"date":115,"type":40},"2026-04-23",{"date":117,"type":40},"2026-02-15",{"date":119,"type":22},"2026-07-15",{"name":46,"class":47},2,{"id":123,"slug":124,"hasResults":11,"nctId":125,"briefTitle":126,"officialTitle":127,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":128,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":129,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":131,"phases":132,"briefSummary":134,"conditions":135,"keywords":137,"overallStatus":36,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":142,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":143,"startDateStruct":145,"completionDateStruct":146,"leadSponsor":148,"locationsCount":48},"100630035","comparison-of-airway-ultrasonography-and-laryngoscopy-methods-in-obese-patients-100630035","NCT07482436","Comparison of Airway Ultrasonography and Laryngoscopy Methods in Obese Patients","The Effect of Preoperative and Postoperative Airway Ultrasonography and Different Laryngoscope Uses on Intubation Success and Postoperative Complications in Obese Patients","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who have given their consent\n* Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia\n* Patients over eighteen years of age\n* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I-II-III\n* Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg\u002Fm2 or higher\n* Patients whose surgery lasts between 60 and 150 minutes\n* Patients who underwent surgery under elective conditions will be included.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who do not consent,\n* those undergoing head and neck surgery,\n* those to be operated on in the prone position,\n* uncooperative patients (patients with whom communication is not possible),\n* those with craniofacial anomalies,\n* patients operated on in emergency situations will be excluded from the study.",{"count":130,"type":22},180,"INTERVENTIONAL",[133],"NA","The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between classical markers used in assessing difficult airway management in obese patients (Mallampati score, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, neck circumference measurement) and ultrasonographic parameters (vocal cord mobility, glottic opening, hyomental distance, skin-epiglottic distance, and peri-epiglottic space-epiglottic-vocal cord ratio), to compare the effects of these parameters on predicting difficult intubation, and to investigate the effects of different laryngoscopy methods on intubation success and peroperative respiratory complications.\n\nThe secondary objective of the study is to investigate the effects of different laryngoscopy methods on hemodynamic responses to intubation. Participants' gender, age, height, weight, BMI, ASA physical status classification, smoking status, comorbidities, STOP-BANG and LEMON scores will be recorded. The glottic score percentage (POGO score), glottic visualization time, endotracheal intubation time, use of assistive maneuvers, and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) parameters will be compared according to the laryngoscopy methods used.\n\nParticipants must meet the following criteria:\n\n* Consent given by the patient\n* Operated under general anesthesia\n* Over 18 years of age\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-II-III\n* Body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg\u002Fm2 or higher\n* Operation duration between 60-150 minutes\n* Patients undergoing elective surgery.",[136],"Correlation of Difficult Airway Markers With Ultrasonographic Measurements in Obese Patients",[138,139,140,141],"laryngoscopy","difficult airway","obese patients","airway ultrasonography","2026-03-14",{"date":144,"type":40},"2026-03-19",{"date":93,"type":40},{"date":147,"type":22},"2026-07-01",{"name":46,"class":47},""]