[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Volkan Gokmen\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":165},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,6,0,[8,47,70,94,121,143],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":28,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":36,"startDateStruct":39,"completionDateStruct":41,"leadSponsor":43,"locationsCount":46},"100657129","perioperative-nursing-workload-missed-care-and-near-miss-events-a-prospective-observational-study-100657129",false,"NCT07834580","Perioperative Nursing Workload, Missed Care, and Near-Miss Events","Perioperative Nursing Workload, Missed Safety-Critical Care and Near-Miss Events: A Prospective Study Guided by the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcome Model","Inclusion Criteria (Perioperative Nurses):\n\n* Actively on duty as a perioperative (operating room) nurse at Agri Training and Research Hospital\n* At least 3 months of operating room experience\n* Voluntary agreement to participate and to complete the post-procedure NASA-TLX form\n\nExclusion Criteria (Perioperative Nurses):\n\n* Extended leave or medical report resulting in inactive duty during the data collection period\n* Withdrawal from the study\n* Failure to complete the post-procedure workload assessment form\n\nInclusion Criteria (Surgical Procedures):\n\n* Performed in the operating rooms of Agri Training and Research Hospital\n* Involves a participating perioperative nurse who is actively on duty\n* Elective or planned surgical procedure\n* At least a portion of the safety-critical care items are directly observable\n\nExclusion Criteria (Surgical Procedures):\n\n* Emergency\u002Fresuscitative circumstances that would affect the clinical flow being observed\n* Procedures in which observation could not be completed\n* Observation records missing core variables",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},330,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","This prospective, single-center observational study examines the relationship between perioperative nursing workload and safety-critical perioperative nursing care in the operating rooms of Agri Training and Research Hospital. Guided by the Donabedian structure-process-outcome framework, the study will directly observe eligible surgical procedures to record objective, procedure-level workload indicators (interruptions, task-switching, concurrent duties, procedure duration, shift timing, and equipment\u002Fsupply shortages) together with the observed perioperative nurse's self-reported workload using the Turkish NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and a structured observation of nine safety-critical perioperative nursing care tasks (identification\u002Fprocedure\u002Fsite verification, allergy and critical preoperative information verification, positioning and pressure-injury prevention, normothermia, surgical counts, specimen\u002Flabel verification, equipment and implant readiness, handoff, and documentation). Any delayed or omitted safety-critical care items, and any near-miss or process-deviation events identified and corrected before patient harm, will also be recorded using standardized forms. The study does not involve patients as direct research participants; only the perioperative work environment and voluntarily participating nurses are observed, and routine clinical care, staffing assignments, and surgical decisions will not be modified. The primary aim is to determine whether higher perioperative nursing workload is associated with a higher rate of missed\u002Fdelayed safety-critical nursing care at the procedure level; secondary aims examine the association between missed safety-critical care and near-miss\u002Fprocess-deviation events, and, if sufficient events occur, whether missed safety-critical care mediates part of the relationship between workload and near-miss\u002Fprocess-deviation events.",[25,26,27],"Missed Nursing Care","Patient Safety","Workload",[29,30,31,32,33],"Donabedian Model","Perioperative Nursing","Safety-Critical Care","Near-Miss","NASA-TLX","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-09-21",{"date":37,"type":38},"2026-09-24","ACTUAL",{"date":40,"type":21},"2026-10",{"date":42,"type":21},"2026-12",{"name":44,"class":45},"Volkan Gokmen","OTHER",1,{"id":48,"slug":49,"hasResults":11,"nctId":50,"briefTitle":51,"officialTitle":52,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":53,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":54,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":56,"conditions":57,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":67,"leadSponsor":68,"locationsCount":69},"100657121","kinesiophobia-postoperative-pain-and-early-mobilization-after-elective-abdominal-surgery-100657121","NCT07834554","Kinesiophobia, Postoperative Pain, and Early Mobilization After Elective Abdominal Surgery","Relationship Between Kinesiophobia Level and Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgery: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years or older\n* Having undergone elective (planned) abdominal surgery\n* Having had surgery under general anesthesia\n* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status class I-II\n* Having completed first mobilization on postoperative day 1\n* Able to communicate in Turkish and understand written\u002Fverbal directions\n* Conscious and oriented\n* Willing to voluntarily participate and provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* A known pre-existing walking\u002Fmovement disorder, balance problem, or orthopedic-neurological disease history\n* Having undergone emergency surgery\n* Being followed in an intensive care unit\n* Having a significant cognitive impairment or communication difficulty that prevents responding to data collection tools\n* Having a visual or hearing impairment that prevents completing the forms\u002Fscales\n* Being in a state of heavy postoperative sedation or delirium\n* Having previously been enrolled in the same study\n* Refusing to participate",{"count":55,"type":21},120,"This study examines the level of kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and its relationship with postoperative pain severity and early mobilization. In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, adult patients who have undergone elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia at two centers (Agri Training and Research Hospital and Taksim Training and Research Hospital) will be assessed after completing their first postoperative mobilization (typically postoperative day 1). Kinesiophobia will be measured with the Turkish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), postoperative pain with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and early mobilization with a researcher-developed Early Mobilization Record Form (time to first ambulation, standing duration, and first walking distance\u002Fduration). The investigators hypothesize that patients' kinesiophobia levels will be positively associated with postoperative pain severity and with delayed\u002Freduced early mobilization, and that patients without prior surgical experience will have higher kinesiophobia levels than those with prior surgical experience.",[58],"Kinesiophobia",[60,61,62,63,64],"Fear of Movement","Postoperative Pain","Early Mobilization","Abdominal Surgery","Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia",{"date":37,"type":38},{"date":40,"type":21},{"date":42,"type":21},{"name":44,"class":45},2,{"id":71,"slug":72,"hasResults":11,"nctId":73,"briefTitle":74,"officialTitle":75,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":76,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":77,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":79,"conditions":80,"keywords":83,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":90,"startDateStruct":91,"completionDateStruct":92,"leadSponsor":93,"locationsCount":46},"100657114","sleep-mindfulness-and-shift-level-safety-performance-in-perianesthesia-nurses-100657114","NCT07832721","Sleep, Mindfulness, and Shift-Level Safety Performance in Perianesthesia Nurses","Sleep, Mindfulness, and Shift-Level Safety Performance in Perianesthesia Nurses: A Prospective Repeated-Measures Study","Nurse-Level Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Registered nurse currently working in the perianesthesia\u002FPACU care areas of the study hospital\n* Willing and available to be followed across multiple of the nurse's own shifts during the study period\n* Willing to provide written informed consent\n\nNurse-Level Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* Not directly involved in bedside perianesthesia\u002FPACU patient care during the observation period (e.g., purely administrative role)\n* Unwilling or unable to complete the baseline and per-shift study instruments\n\nShift-Level Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Regularly scheduled perianesthesia\u002FPACU shift of a participating nurse occurring during the study period\n* At least one applicable safety-critical care process occurs during the shift\n\nShift-Level Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* Shift is shortened, cancelled, or substantially altered such that planned pre-shift\u002Fpost-shift data collection and safety-process observation cannot be completed\n* Study observer is unavailable to complete the safety-process observation for that shift",{"count":78,"type":21},300,"Perianesthesia (preoperative and postanesthesia care unit, PACU) nurses work rotating, often extended shifts that can disrupt sleep and increase fatigue, both of which are recognized threats to patient safety in high-acuity perioperative settings. Mindfulness, a trait-like capacity for present-moment, non-judgmental awareness, has been proposed as a psychological resource that may help nurses regulate attention and buffer the effects of sleep loss and fatigue on clinical performance. However, little is known about how sleep quality and quantity, shift-level fatigue, and mindfulness jointly relate to the day-to-day safety performance of perianesthesia nurses.\n\nThis prospective, repeated-measures, single-center study examines the relationships among sleep, mindfulness, and shift-level safety performance among nurses working in the perianesthesia\u002FPACU care areas of Ağrı Training and Research Hospital. Approximately 25 to 40 perianesthesia nurses will be followed across 8 to 12 of their own shifts each, with a target of 250 to 300 evaluable shift-level observations. At baseline, nurses will complete a demographic form together with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Before each observed shift, nurses will complete a brief pre-shift sleep and sleepiness diary; after each shift they will complete a post-shift acute-fatigue and shift-characteristics form. For each observed shift, trained researchers will use a researcher-developed Perianesthesia Safety Process Observation Form to document adherence to, and deviations from, applicable safety-critical care processes.\n\nThe primary outcome is the Shift-Level Perianesthesia Safety Deviation Rate, defined as the number of observed safety-process deviations divided by the number of applicable safety processes for that shift. Secondary outcomes include post-shift acute fatigue, the occurrence of near-miss events, and exploratory analyses of whether trait mindfulness moderates the associations between sleep\u002Ffatigue and safety performance. No patients are directly enrolled as research subjects; only nurses and their shifts are observed. Findings are expected to inform strategies to support nurse sleep, wellbeing, and safety-critical performance in perianesthesia settings.",[81,82,26],"Sleep","Fatigue",[84,85,86,87,82,88,89],"Perianesthesia Nursing","PACU","Sleep Quality","Mindfulness","Sleepiness","Shift Work",{"date":37,"type":38},{"date":40,"type":21},{"date":42,"type":21},{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":95,"slug":96,"hasResults":11,"nctId":97,"briefTitle":98,"officialTitle":99,"acronym":100,"eligibilityCriteria":101,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":102,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":104,"phases":105,"briefSummary":107,"conditions":108,"keywords":110,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":35,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":116,"startDateStruct":117,"completionDateStruct":118,"leadSponsor":120,"locationsCount":46},"100657006","sensory-restriction-simulation-training-for-nursing-student-empathy-and-communication-100657006","NCT07834541","Sensory Restriction Simulation Training for Nursing Student Empathy and Communication","The Effect of the Reality-Integrated Quality Education (GENE) Approach With Sensory Restriction Simulations on Nursing Students' Empathy, Communication, and Patient-Centered Care Skills","GENE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Currently enrolled as a third-year nursing student in the Nursing Department of Agri Ibrahim Cecen University\n* Voluntary agreement to participate and provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Declining to provide informed consent\n* Not currently enrolled as a third-year nursing student in the Nursing Department of Agri Ibrahim Cecen University",{"count":103,"type":21},60,"INTERVENTIONAL",[106],"NA","This study evaluates the effect of the Reality-Integrated Quality Education (GENE) approach, an educational intervention using sensory restriction simulations (vision, hearing, speech, and movement restriction), on empathy, communication skills, patience, psychological resilience, and patient-centered care competency among third-year nursing students. Sixty nursing students will be randomly allocated to an experimental group (n=30), who will complete a single 30-45 minute GENE simulation session, or a control group (n=30), who will receive standard theoretical empathy education without the simulation component. Outcomes will be assessed immediately before and after the session using the Turkish versions of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Nursing Student (JSE-NS), a Communication Skills Inventory, a Patience Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, and a Patient-Centered Care Competency Scale. The investigators hypothesize that participation in the GENE sensory restriction simulations will produce greater short-term gains in empathy, communication, patience, resilience, and patient-centered care competency than theoretical education alone.",[109],"Empathy",[111,112,113,114,115],"Nursing Education","Simulation Training","Sensory Restriction Simulation","Communication Skills","Patient-Centered Care",{"date":37,"type":38},{"date":40,"type":21},{"date":119,"type":21},"2027-04",{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":122,"slug":123,"hasResults":11,"nctId":124,"briefTitle":125,"officialTitle":126,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":127,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":128,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":130,"conditions":131,"keywords":132,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":137,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":138,"startDateStruct":140,"completionDateStruct":141,"leadSponsor":142,"locationsCount":69},"100656899","surgical-nurses-pain-management-self-efficacy-and-patients-postoperative-pain-outcomes-100656899","NCT07830498","Surgical Nurses' Pain Management Self-Efficacy and Patients' Postoperative Pain Outcomes","The Relationship Between Surgical Nurses' Pain Management Self-Efficacy and Patients' Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes: A Nurse-Patient Dyad Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nSurgical Nurses:\n\n* Currently employed as a registered nurse\n* Working in the general surgery clinic where the study is conducted\n* Actively involved in postoperative patient care\n* Employed in the relevant clinic for at least 3 months\n* Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study\n\nSurgical Patients:\n\n* 18 years of age or older\n* Has undergone a surgical procedure\n* Receiving postoperative care in the general surgery clinic where the study is conducted\n* Within the first 24 postoperative hours\n* Able to communicate in Turkish\n* Conscious and cognitively able to answer study questions\n* Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nSurgical Nurses:\n\n* On extended leave or medical report during the data collection period, resulting in no active clinical care\n* Does not complete the data collection form during the study period\n\nSurgical Patients:\n\n* Followed in the intensive care unit\n* Impaired consciousness that prevents assessment\n* Serious cognitive or communication impairment that prevents communication\n* Underwent emergency surgery\n* Unable to complete the study data collection forms",{"count":129,"type":21},340,"This study examines whether surgical nurses' confidence in managing patients' pain (pain management self-efficacy) is related to how well their patients' pain is managed after surgery. Nurses working in general surgery clinics will complete a questionnaire about their own pain management self-efficacy, and the surgical patients under their care will complete a separate questionnaire about their postoperative pain outcomes. Each patient's responses will be linked to the nurse who cared for them, creating nurse-patient pairs, in order to explore how nurse-level factors relate to patient-level pain outcomes. This is an observational study: no treatment, medication, or intervention is provided or tested; participants only complete questionnaires.",[61],[133,134,135,136],"Pain Management","Surgical Nursing","Self-Efficacy","Nurse-Patient Dyad","2026-09-20",{"date":139,"type":38},"2026-09-23",{"date":40,"type":21},{"date":42,"type":21},{"name":44,"class":45},{"id":144,"slug":145,"hasResults":11,"nctId":146,"briefTitle":147,"officialTitle":148,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":149,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":150,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":151,"conditions":152,"keywords":154,"overallStatus":34,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":160,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":161,"startDateStruct":162,"completionDateStruct":163,"leadSponsor":164,"locationsCount":46},"100656822","preoperative-smoke-check-and-surgical-smoke-evacuation-compliance-100656822","NCT07830524","Preoperative Smoke Check and Surgical Smoke Evacuation Compliance","The Effect of a Preoperative Smoke Check Practice on Compliance With Surgical Smoke Evacuation","Note: The unit of observation and analysis in this study is the surgical procedure, not the individual patient. The eligibility criteria below describe which surgical procedures were eligible for inclusion in observation and data collection.\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* Surgical procedures performed at Agri Training and Research Hospital during the designated Baseline Period or Post-Smoke Check Period data collection windows\n* Procedures utilizing an energy-based device (electrosurgery, laser, or ultrasonic device) capable of generating surgical smoke\n* Procedures for which smoke evacuation practices could be directly and continuously observed by the study's trained observer for the full duration of the procedure\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Procedures not utilizing an energy-based device or not expected to generate surgical smoke\n* Emergency procedures in which direct, continuous observation of smoke evacuation practices was not feasible\n* Procedures with incomplete or missing observation data on the Surgical Smoke Compliance Observation Form",{"count":78,"type":21},"This single-center, prospective before-after (quasi-experimental) study evaluates whether a brief preoperative \"Smoke Check\" practice improves compliance with surgical smoke evacuation during smoke-generating surgical procedures. The Smoke Check consists of two short safety questions asked by the circulating nurse before a procedure begins: (1) Is surgical smoke expected to be generated during this procedure? and (2) If yes, is an appropriate smoke evacuation system ready for use? The study first observes current practice during a Baseline period without changing existing workflow, and then introduces the Smoke Check into the circulating nurses' preoperative routine during a second (Post-Smoke Check) period, comparing the proportion of smoke-generating procedures with appropriate smoke evacuation use between the two periods. The unit of observation is the surgical procedure, not the patient or staff member, and no patient- or staff-identifying information is collected. The study is grounded in the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) Guideline for Surgical Smoke Safety and does not involve any drug, device, or licensed psychometric instrument.",[153],"Surgical Smoke Exposure",[155,156,157,26,158,159],"Surgical Smoke","Smoke Evacuation","Operating Room Nursing","Staff Safety","Preoperative Checklist","2026-09-15",{"date":35,"type":38},{"date":40,"type":21},{"date":42,"type":21},{"name":44,"class":45},""]