[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"decayed-primary-molars\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:decayed-primary-molars":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,55,80],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":43,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":44,"startDateStruct":47,"completionDateStruct":49,"leadSponsor":51,"locationsCount":54},"100659652","clinical-evaluation-of-different-bulk-fill-restorative-materials-in-primary-molars-100659652",false,"NCT07868016","Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Molars","Evaluation of Clinical Success and Survival of Different Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Split-Mouth Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Cooperative pediatric patients aged between 4 and 9 years.\n* Presence of bilateral primary second molars with Class II dentin caries requiring restoration.\n* Teeth with positive response to vitality tests (where applicable) and no clinical signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, periapical pathology, or spontaneous pain.\n* Teeth restorable with direct restorative techniques.\n* Parents or legal guardians providing signed informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with systemic diseases, bleeding disorders, or physical\u002Fmental disabilities that prevent cooperation during dental treatment.\n* Teeth with excessive loss of tooth structure that cannot be restored with a direct restoration or requiring crown coverage.\n* Teeth with clinical or radiographic signs of pulp exposure, pulp involvement, internal\u002Fexternal resorption, or periapical\u002Ffurcation involvement.\n* Teeth with poor oral hygiene or high caries risk where isolation is compromised.\n* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the components of the tested materials (e.g., resin composites, primers, adhesives).","ALL","4 Years","9 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},70,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical performance of chemically-cured and light-cured bulk-fill composite materials used for Class II restorations in children aged 4 to 9 years with primary second molars. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nWhat are the clinical success rates of the restorations at 12 months based on modified FDI criteria?\n\nHow do the two materials compare regarding application times, clinician ease of use, and patient satisfaction?\n\nResearchers will compare the chemically-cured bulk-fill composite (Stela Capsule) to the light-cured bulk-fill composite (Filtek One) using a split-mouth design to see which material provides better long-term clinical performance and survival rates.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nReceive two different bulk-fill composite restorations in matched primary second molars within the same dental arch\n\nVisit the clinic for routine checkups and evaluations at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months",[27,28,29],"Decayed Primary Molars","Decayed Tooth","Dentin Caries",[31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"dental caries","pediatric dentistry","primary teeth","deciduous teeth","primary molars","Class II Restorations","Bulk-Fill Composite","Resin Composite","Dental Restoration","Chemically-Cured Composite","Light-Cured Composite","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-10-06",{"date":45,"type":46},"2026-10-09","ACTUAL",{"date":48,"type":21},"2026-10-30",{"date":50,"type":21},"2027-04-30",{"name":52,"class":53},"Burak Carıkcıoglu","OTHER",1,{"id":56,"slug":57,"hasResults":11,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":60,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":61,"healthyVolunteers":62,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":63,"enrollmentInfo":64,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":66,"briefSummary":67,"conditions":68,"keywords":69,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":72,"startDateStruct":74,"completionDateStruct":76,"leadSponsor":78,"locationsCount":54},"100561513","evaluation-of-periodontal-health-after-treatment-with-hall-technique-versus-atraumatic-restorative-treatment-in-the-management-of-carious-primary-molars-100561513","NCT06591143","Evaluation Of Periodontal Health After Treatment With Hall Technique Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in The Management of Carious Primary Molars","Evaluation Of Periodontal Health After Treatment With Hall Technique Compared to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in The Management of Carious Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: From 4 to 6 years.\n* Caries in primary molars within enamel\u002Fdentin with vital pulp.\n* Healthy children.\n* Cooperative children.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of signs and symptoms of necrosis.\n* Root caries.\n* History of Spontaneous pain.",true,"6 Years",{"count":65,"type":21},46,[24],"This trial seeks to evaluate the periodontal health of two modalities Hall Technique (by placing a stainless steel crown without caries removal, local anaesthesia won't be needed) \\& ART (by removing caries by sharp excavator and restoring the tooth with glass ionomer, local anaesthesia won't be needed either) to achieve better treatment for caries with pain-free procedures in developing countries that have high caries index and low income.",[27],[70],"Decayed primary molars ART Hall technique","2024-09-09",{"date":73,"type":46},"2024-09-19",{"date":75,"type":21},"2024-10-01",{"date":77,"type":21},"2025-12-01",{"name":79,"class":53},"Cairo University",{"id":81,"slug":82,"hasResults":11,"nctId":83,"briefTitle":84,"officialTitle":85,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":86,"healthyVolunteers":62,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":63,"enrollmentInfo":87,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":89,"briefSummary":90,"conditions":91,"keywords":92,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":71,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":96,"startDateStruct":97,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":99,"locationsCount":54},"100561396","major-failure-rate-assessment-of-atraumatic-restorative-techniques-versus-hall-technique-in-the-management-of-decayed-primary-molars-in-children-aged-4-6-years-old-100561396","NCT06589622","Major Failure Rate Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Techniques Versus Hall Technique in the Management of Decayed Primary Molars in Children Aged 4-6 Years Old","The Major Failures of Hall Technique Versus Atraumatic Restorative Technique in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* Age: From 4 to 6 years.\n* Cooperative children\n* Children with no systemic disease, occlusal problems or bad habits.\n* Primary molars with vital pulp.\n* Class II Caries in primary molars within enamel\u002Fdentin.\n* Molars in occlusion with the antagonist tooth\u002Fteeth.\n* Teeth with no developmental anomalies.\n* Absence of spontaneous pain and tenderness to percussion.\n* Absence of any radiolucency in furcation and\u002For periradicular regions.\n* No pathological and internal\u002Fexternal resorption.\n\nExclusion criteria:\n\n* Presence of signs and symptoms of necrosis (Fistula, abscess, mobility or furcation involvement).\n* Root caries.\n* History of Spontaneous pain.",{"count":88,"type":21},64,[24],"This study is designed to compare major failure rate between ART ( excavation of caries with hand instruments and placing glass ionomer restoration without the use of rotary instruments) versus hall technique ( placing a stainless steel crown on the decayed primary molar without prepartion or caries removal)",[27],[93,94,95],"ART","Hall technique","decayed primary molars",{"date":73,"type":46},{"date":75,"type":21},{"date":77,"type":21},{"name":79,"class":53}]