[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"elder-mistreatment\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:elder-mistreatment":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,44,75,99,134],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":32,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":33,"startDateStruct":36,"completionDateStruct":38,"leadSponsor":40,"locationsCount":43},"100651208","primary-care-screening-and-intervention-for-patients-with-dementia-and-caregivers-100651208",false,"NCT07758738","Primary Care Screening and Intervention for Patients With Dementia and Caregivers","Primary Care Screening and Intervention for Caregiving Assessment and Support for Patients With Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial","SIRENS","Primary care provider Inclusion Criteria • Active PCP who may be a physician or nurse practitioner seeing adult primary care patients with dementia at: Weill Cornell Medicine\n\nPrimary care provider Exclusion Criteria\n\n• Not a PCP of older adults with dementia who may be at risk of being neglected.\n\nOlder Adult Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Aged ≥ 60 years\n* Community-dwelling\n* Patient of WCM\u002FNYP\n* Has diagnosis of dementia (based on medical records prior to enrollment)\n* Requires assistance with at least 1 ADL\n* Able to travel to a WCM\u002FNYP clinic for study activities\n* Has informal (either unpaid or CDPAP) caregiver who provides ≥8 hours weekly\n* Not already known to be experiencing neglect from caregiver\n\nOlder Adult Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* In hospice\n* Decision has already been made to re-locate to an institution (including long-term care skilled nursing facilities)\n\nCaregiver Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 21 years\n* Living with or near the older adult\n* Self-identifies as a caregiver for the older adult\n* Provides ≥ 8 hours per week of direct care (may include logistics, oversight, observation, as well as hands-on care, but must include at least some in-person assistance)\n* Able to travel to a WCM\u002FNYP clinic for study activities or participate in study activities virtually through Zoom on their personal device\n* Not a professional caregiver, does not receive direct payment in return for care (unless through CDPAP)\n* Can read and speak English at a 6th grade level\n* No active plan to disengage from providing care to older adult within the next year\n\nCaregiver Exclusion Criteria:\n\n* Unable to read and speak English at a 6th grade level\n* Hired\u002Fpaid professional caregiver\n* Is blind or deaf\n* Active plan to disengage from providing care to older adult within the next year",true,"ALL","21 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},774,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of screening for elder neglect in older adults with dementia in primary care settings and the impact of an intervention for caregivers of older adults with dementia.\n\nThe hypothesis of the study are:\n\n* Neglect screening in primary care will have a positive impact on outcomes including a decrease in presence of neglect at 6 months and other patient and caregiver outcomes\n* Neglect screening paired with a caregiving intervention will have a greater impact on these outcomes than screening alone\n\nResearchers will compare three groups of participants to find out how effective the screening tool is on its own, and how effective it is when combined with the support program, compared to standard care.\n\nParticipants will be asked to:\n\n* attend primary care clinic visits\n* complete questionnaires\n* participate in the intervention\n* participate in a semi-structured interview",[28,29,30],"Dementia","Elder Abuse","Elder Mistreatment","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-08-05",{"date":34,"type":35},"2026-08-11","ACTUAL",{"date":37,"type":22},"2026-11-01",{"date":39,"type":22},"2027-07-31",{"name":41,"class":42},"Weill Medical College of Cornell University","OTHER",1,{"id":45,"slug":46,"hasResults":11,"nctId":47,"briefTitle":48,"officialTitle":49,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":50,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":51,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":52,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":54,"briefSummary":55,"conditions":56,"keywords":62,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":69,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":43},"100650642","applying-csnat-in-hbpc-as-an-approach-to-elder-mistreatment-risk-reduction-100650642","NCT07749482","Applying CSNAT in HBPC as an Approach to Elder Mistreatment Risk Reduction","Applying a Family Caregiver Supports Needs Assessment Tool in Home-based Primary Care: An Approach to Elder Mistreatment Risk Reduction and Prevention","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Be 18 years of age or older.\n* Self-report as providing consistent care to an older adult who receives medical home visits by a nurse practitioner as part of the UTMB Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Program.\n* Provides consistent care to an older adult which includes one or more of the following: a) Assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), b) Medication management, c) Medical or nursing-related tasks\n* Provides consistent care to an adult age 65 years or older.\n* Be able to read, speak, and understand English.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Does not provide consistent home care (including assistance with ADLs, medication management, or medical\u002Fnursing tasks)\n* Provides care to a patient who is under 65 years of age\n* Provides care to a patient not enrolled in the UTMB Health HBPC program\n* Provides care to a patient not receiving in-home visits by a nurse practitioner.\n* Is younger than 18 years of age\n* Is unable to read or speak English\n* Has an obvious neurological or psychiatric condition that may affect participation\n* Has communication deficits that may impact ability to participate","18 Years",{"count":53,"type":22},80,[25],"This study will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) intervention for family caregivers of older adults receiving home-based primary care. The CSNAT is a structured, caregiver-centered approach designed to identify caregiver support needs and facilitate supportive problem-solving conversations between clinicians and family caregivers.\n\nFamily caregivers will be assigned to either the CSNAT intervention or a comparison group receiving usual care. Feasibility will be evaluated through participant recruitment, retention, and intervention adherence. Acceptability will be assessed through qualitative interviews with caregivers who participate in the intervention.\n\nThe study will also examine the preliminary effects of the CSNAT intervention on caregiver outcomes, including caregiver strain, physical well-being, mental well-being, and emotional management. In addition, the study will explore whether improvements in caregiver well-being are associated with a reduced risk of situations that may contribute to harm or neglect of the older adult receiving care.\n\nThis pilot study will provide information on the practicality of implementing the CSNAT intervention in home-based primary care and will inform the design of future larger-scale studies.",[57,58,59,60,61,30],"Caregiver Stress","Caregiver Health Related QOL","Caregiver Mental Health","Caregiver Health Status","Recruitment of Participants",[63,64,65],"elder mistreatment","caregiver support","homebased primary care","2026-08-04",{"date":68,"type":35},"2026-08-06",{"date":70,"type":22},"2026-08",{"date":72,"type":22},"2028-09",{"name":74,"class":42},"The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston",{"id":76,"slug":77,"hasResults":11,"nctId":78,"briefTitle":79,"officialTitle":80,"acronym":81,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":51,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":83,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":85,"briefSummary":86,"conditions":87,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":90,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":91,"startDateStruct":93,"completionDateStruct":95,"leadSponsor":97,"locationsCount":43},"100609620","knowledge-and-interpersonal-skills-to-develop-enhanced-relationships-kinder-100609620","NCT07216950","Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER)","Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER): Testing the Efficacy of an Intervention to Prevent Psychological Elder Abuse in Family Caregiving","KINDER","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age range: from 18 to No upper limit;\n* Be a family member to an individual living with AD\u002FADRD;\n* Provide assistance with at least two instrumental activities of daily living or one activity of daily living;\n* Provides at least 4 hours of caregiving per day and sees the care recipient in-person at least 2 times per week on average\n* The care recipient is at least age 65 or older\n* Report an AD8 Dementia Screening score for care recipients of at least 2;\n* Commit to attending at three discussion sessions;\n* Have reliable access to internet and email, and to be able to attend synchronous sessions using the Zoom videoconferencing platform.\n* Caregiver lives in any of the following states, which may require mandetory reporting of elder mistreatment when responding to survey questions:\n\nDelaware, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wyoming\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Are unable to read or speak English;\n* Previously participated in Learning Skills Together (NCT05846984) or KINDER pilot study;\n* Have plans to place the care recipient in a skilled nursing facility within the next 8 months (i.e., study duration)",{"count":84,"type":22},260,[25],"The Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER) intervention was developed to prevent psychological elder abuse (EA) and promote high-quality caregiving by lowering relationship strain and developing CG resourcefulness. The goal of this two-arm, randomized control trial is to determine the efficacy of KINDER at mitigating psychological EA by family caregivers to persons living with dementia and to describe how the intervention may work to reduce psychological EA.",[30,29,88,28,89],"Quality of Care","Caregiving","2026-07-11",{"date":92,"type":35},"2026-07-14",{"date":94,"type":22},"2026-09-15",{"date":96,"type":22},"2030-03-15",{"name":98,"class":42},"Case Western Reserve University",{"id":100,"slug":101,"hasResults":11,"nctId":102,"briefTitle":103,"officialTitle":103,"acronym":104,"eligibilityCriteria":105,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":51,"maxAge":106,"enrollmentInfo":107,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":109,"phases":4,"briefSummary":110,"conditions":111,"keywords":119,"overallStatus":31,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":124,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":125,"startDateStruct":127,"completionDateStruct":129,"leadSponsor":131,"locationsCount":43},"100630957","a-path-to-prevention-of-elder-abuse-in-long-term-care-prevalence-study-among-staff-in-long-term-care-100630957","NCT07494422","A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term Care. Prevalence Study Among Staff in Long-term Care.","APPEAL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Working in home care services or a long-term care facility in Sweden\n* Working in direct contact with older adults (e.g., providing care, nursing, rehabilitation to older adults)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* None","69 Years",{"count":108,"type":22},6000,"OBSERVATIONAL","Globally, studies indicated that 16% of community dwelling older adults have been exposed to some form of abuse in the past 12 months. Furthermore, a global meta-analysis about AOP in long-term care facilities used staff as respondents and found that the pooled estimate of overall self-reported perpetration of staff to resident abuse during the past 12 months was 64.2% (95% CI 53.3-73.9%). Similar findings was also reported in a study from Norway in which the overall prevalence of observed staff-to-resident abuse was 76% and 60% of respondents report self-perpetration of abusive acts during the past 12 months. Resident-to-resident aggression was even more common, observed by 88% of respondents.\n\nThis study is part of the Swedish national research program APPEAL (A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term care) with the long-term goal to co-create an intervention for abuse of older people (AOP) in nursing homes together with stakeholders, i.e., staff, managers, care recipients and relatives.\n\nStudy design and data collection:\n\nA cross-sectional study design will be used with slightly different data collection modes.\n\n1. Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden. Data will be collected through a digital survey. Data will be combined with available register data from Statistics Sweden, including for example sex, age, civil state and occupational related data.\n2. Workplace sample. Sweden has 290 Municipalities. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the municipalities based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. In the randomization process, geographical location of the municipalities has been considered to assure national representativeness, meaning that in case several municipalities in the same geographical region were selected a new randomization was conducted. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization. Data will be collected through a digital questionnaire. Organizations will be encouraged to set a side time at a staff meeting for completing the questionnaire. If this is not possible, a link to the questionnaire will be sent out by e-mail. Data will be collected anonymously.\n\nMaterial:\n\nThe questionnaire used in the previously mentioned Norwegian study about AOP in long-term care facilities has been translated and culturally adapted. In addition, items about background characteristics of respondents as well as risk factors for AOP on both an individual and system level are included, e.g., workload and perceived support at the workplace and ageist attitudes.\n\nAnalysis:\n\nPrimary outcomes will be proportion of staff reporting different types of abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial abuse and neglect) in different relational contexts, i.e., self-perpetrated, staff-to-resident and relative-to resident abuse, and in long-term care facilities resident-to-resident abuse.\n\nSecondary outcome will be staff reported own exposure to different forms of abuse at the workplace, including by residents, co-workers, relatives and managers.\n\nLogistic regression analysis will be used to investigate associations between reporting different forms of abuse and potentially explanatory factors.",[112,113,114,115,116,117,29,30,118],"Abuse Domestic","Abuse Neglect","Abuse Physical","Abuse Verbal","Abuse, Sexual","Violence and Victimization","Long Term Care",[120,121,122,123],"Abuse of older people","Long-term care facilities","Home care","Home health care","2026-03-20",{"date":126,"type":35},"2026-03-27",{"date":128,"type":22},"2026-03-24",{"date":130,"type":22},"2027-04-30",{"name":132,"class":133},"Linkoeping University","OTHER_GOV",{"id":135,"slug":136,"hasResults":11,"nctId":137,"briefTitle":138,"officialTitle":139,"acronym":140,"eligibilityCriteria":141,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":18,"minAge":51,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":142,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":144,"briefSummary":145,"conditions":146,"keywords":147,"overallStatus":148,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":149,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":150,"startDateStruct":152,"completionDateStruct":154,"leadSponsor":156,"locationsCount":158},"100512915","detect-rpc-universal-em-screening-100512915","NCT05958654","DETECT-RPC Universal EM Screening","Detection of Elder Mistreatment Through Emergency Care Technicians - Revised for Primary Care (DETECT-RPC) Universal EM Screening","DETECT-RPC","Inclusion Criteria (Clinicians):\n\n* Clinician who actively provides home-based primary care (HBPC) to patients enrolled in one of our partner home-based primary care programs at least part time.\n\nExclusion Criteria (Clinicians):\n\n* HBPC Clinicians must be a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant who actively provides home-based primary care to patients enrolled at a partner site HBPC at least part time\n\nInclusion Criteria (patients):\n\n* in home-based primary care\n* 60 years or older\n* seen by a clinician participating in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria (patients)\n\n* Must be aged 60 and older, enrolled in a site-specific partner HBPC and treated in their primary residence",{"count":143,"type":22},43,[25],"The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of the Detection of Elder Mistreatment Through Emergency Care Technicians-Revised for Primary Care (DETECT-RPC) screening tool increases the average reporting of elder mistreatment (EM) by homebased primary care (HBPC) clinicians.",[29,30],[30],"RECRUITING","2025-06-12",{"date":151,"type":35},"2025-06-13",{"date":153,"type":35},"2025-02-18",{"date":155,"type":22},"2029-08-31",{"name":157,"class":42},"The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston",7]