[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"ethics-nursing\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:ethics-nursing":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,51],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":4,"briefSummary":23,"conditions":24,"keywords":29,"overallStatus":38,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":39,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":40,"startDateStruct":43,"completionDateStruct":45,"leadSponsor":47,"locationsCount":50},"100649704","an-exploration-of-family-centred-care-fcc-in-uk-inpatient-wards-100649704",false,"NCT07740369","An Exploration of Family Centred Care (FCC) in UK Inpatient Wards","Balancing Family and Ethics: An Exploration of Family Centred Care in UK Inpatient Wards","FCC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nAge:\n\n\\- 18 years or older\n\nRole: Must fall into one of the following categories:\n\n* A patient admitted to an internal medicine ward\n* A family member of a patient admitted to an internal medicine ward\n* A registered nurse working on an internal medicine ward\n\nCapacity:\n\n\\- Able and willing to provide informed consent\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Are under 18 years of age\n* Are unable to provide informed consent\n* Are unable to participate in study interviews (e.g., due to cognitive, linguistic, or medical limitations)","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},30,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","This qualitative study will explore how family-centred care is understood and experienced in adult inpatient medical wards in the UK. Family-centred care involves including a patient's family in care and discussions where appropriate. Although family involvement can improve communication, emotional support and shared decision-making, it may also create ethical challenges where family wishes differ from the patient's preferences or clinical judgement.\n\nThe study will recruit 30 adults at Milton Keynes University Hospital: 10 patients admitted to an internal medicine ward, 10 family members of patients admitted to an internal medicine ward and 10 registered nurses working on an internal medicine ward. Each participant will take part in one semi-structured interview lasting approximately 30-60 minutes, conducted face to face, by telephone or by video call.\n\nThe study is based on the expectation that patients, family members and nurses may experience family involvement differently, and that cultural values may influence how family-centred care is applied in practice. The interviews will explore issues including privacy, informed consent, patient autonomy and decision-making. The UK findings will also be compared with findings from an identical study being conducted in Israel to examine how cultural and value-based contexts may affect family involvement in hospital care.\n\nThe findings may help identify practical communication approaches for delivering culturally sensitive family-centred care while protecting patients' rights and supporting nurses' professional responsibilities.",[25,26,27,28],"Nursing","Family Centered Care","Ethics Nursing","Family Nursing",[30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37],"Family-centred care","Family involvement","Nursing ethics","Patient autonomy","Shared decision-making","Qualitative interviews","Informed consent","Culturally sensitive care","RECRUITING","2026-07-30",{"date":41,"type":42},"2026-07-31","ACTUAL",{"date":44,"type":42},"2026-07-24",{"date":46,"type":21},"2028-06-30",{"name":48,"class":49},"Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust","OTHER_GOV",1,{"id":52,"slug":53,"hasResults":11,"nctId":54,"briefTitle":55,"officialTitle":56,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":57,"healthyVolunteers":58,"sex":17,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":59,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":61,"phases":62,"briefSummary":64,"conditions":65,"keywords":69,"overallStatus":78,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":79,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":80,"startDateStruct":82,"completionDateStruct":84,"leadSponsor":86,"locationsCount":50},"100646244","video-learning-for-empathy-ethics-and-family-witnessed-resuscitation-100646244","NCT07692568","VIDEO LEARNING FOR EMPATHY, ETHICS AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION","THE EFFECT OF A VIDEO BASED DIGITAL LEARNING INTERVENTION ON NURSING STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF EMPATHY, ETHICAL SENSITIVITY, AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION IN THEIR PATIENT PERSPECTIVE EXPERIENCES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being a second-year undergraduate nursing student\n* Volunteering to participate in the study and signing the informed consent form\n* Not having participated in a similar virtual reality or family-witnessed CPR study before\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Having a diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorder that prevents using virtual reality glasses (such as epilepsy, severe vertigo, or motion sickness)\n* Having uncorrected visual or hearing impairments\n* Not completing all stages of the study (pre-test, intervention, or post-test)",true,{"count":60,"type":21},105,"INTERVENTIONAL",[63],"NA","This clinical trial (randomized controlled experimental study) aims to learn about the effects of presenting the family-witnessed CPR process from a patient's perspective through 360° virtual reality and 2D video within second-year nursing students. The primary question(s) \u002F hypotheses it aims to answer are:\n\n* H1: Will the content validity ratio of the developed scenario be above 0.80?\n* H2: Is the increase in empathy scores (pre-test\u002Fpost-test difference) of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups?\n* H3: Is the increase in ethical sensitivity scores of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups?\n* H4: Is the change in perception scores toward family-witnessed CPR more positive in the 360° VR group compared to the other groups, and is their mean SUS (System Usability Scale) score at or above the acceptability threshold of 70?\n* H5: Is the VES (Video Engagement Skale) score of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher than that of the 2D video group? Researchers will compare the 360° immersive video (360° VR) group, the 2-dimensional (2D) video group, and the control group to see if there are effects on empathy, ethical sensitivity, perception of risks-benefits of family presence, self-confidence regarding family presence, video engagement, and system usability.\n\nParticipants will be asked to:\n\n* Watch the scenario reenactment involving a family-witnessed CPR process, recorded via a 360° camera (in either 360° VR or 2D format, depending on their assigned group).\n* Complete data collection tools consisting of the Introductory Information Form, \"Jefferson Scale of Empathy\", \"Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire\", \"Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self-Confidence Scale\", \"System Usability Scale (SUS-TR)\", and \"Video Engagement Skale(VES)\".",[66,67,27,68],"Family Witnessed Resuscitation","Empathy Education","Education Nursing",[70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77],"Virtual reality","360-degree video","2D video","Patient perspective","Nursing students","Empathy","Ethical sensitivity","Family-witnessed resuscitation","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-07-16",{"date":81,"type":42},"2026-07-17",{"date":83,"type":21},"2026-07-04",{"date":85,"type":21},"2027-04-01",{"name":87,"class":88},"Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi","OTHER"]