[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"joint-instability\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:joint-instability":30},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,68,102],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":38,"overallStatus":56,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":57,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":58,"startDateStruct":61,"completionDateStruct":63,"leadSponsor":65,"locationsCount":4},"100646071","phase-1-regenerative-medicine-for-joint-hypermobility-and-instability-100646071",false,"NCT07688096","Regenerative Medicine for Joint Hypermobility and Instability","Regenerative Medicine for Joint Hypermobility and Instability: A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Step-Care Clinical Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults age 18 years or older, any gender.\n* Symptomatic joint hypermobility or instability attributable to one of the following:\n\n  1. hEDS diagnosed using the 2017 International Classification of the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes diagnostic criteria;\n  2. HSD classified using the 2017 framework (generalized, peripheral, localized, or historical HSD) with Beighton scoring; or\n  3. post-traumatic joint instability with ligamentous injury documented by examination and\u002For imaging.\n* Objective evidence of instability or clinically relevant hypermobility at one or more target joints, defined as at least one of:\n\n  1. a positive joint-specific instability provocation test on standardized physical examination;\n  2. generalized hypermobility (Beighton score ≥ 5\u002F9 for adults) or documented joint-specific hypermobility at the target joint; or\n  3. imaging evidence of ligamentous laxity or injury at the target joint (dynamic ultrasound, stress radiograph, or MRI).\n* Pain attributable to the target joint for at least 3 months.\n* Baseline pain score of 4 or greater on a 0-10 numeric rating scale.\n* Failure of conservative treatment, including at least 6 weeks of physical therapy directed at the affected joint(s).\n* Not currently using NSAIDs and willing to avoid NSAIDs during the active treatment period, when clinically appropriate.\n* Able to provide informed consent and to comply with study procedures and follow-up.\n\nAdditional eligibility for the Hyaluronic Acid (HA) alternative pathway - a participant may enter the HA pathway if ALL of the following apply, in addition to the inclusion criteria above:\n\n* Has completed at least one regenerative medicine phase (dextrose, PRP, or doxycycline) and either\n\n  1. was classified as an inadequate responder at the phase decision point (GPI \\\u003C 40%) and declined further regenerative rotation,\n  2. completed all available regenerative phases without adequate response, or\n  3. experienced an adverse reaction during a regenerative phase that, in the investigator's judgment, contraindicates further regenerative treatment.\n* A minimum waiting period of 4 weeks has elapsed since the last regenerative medicine treatment attempted, to allow resolution of post-injection effects before HA administration.\n* The target joint(s) have clinical or imaging features amenable to HA viscosupplementation (e.g., articular\u002Fosteoarthritic pain component identifiable on examination or imaging).\n* No contraindication to HA (see Exclusion Criteria).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Impaired decision-making capacity that precludes valid informed consent.\n* Active local or systemic infection.\n* Known allergy or contraindication to study injections, local anesthetics, iodinated contrast (if fluoroscopy is planned), or required procedural materials.\n* Known hypersensitivity or intolerance to tetracycline-class antibiotics, including doxycycline (relevant to the doxycycline treatment phase).\n* Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) or other mast cell disorder that, in the investigator's judgment, elevates the risk of injection-related hypersensitivity or systemic reactions.\n* Active autoimmune or systemic inflammatory connective-tissue disease that, in the investigator's judgment, may confound the response to regenerative treatment or increase procedural risk.\n* Known hypersensitivity to sodium hyaluronate or to the specific HA product to be used (Visco-3); active skin disease or infection over the planned injection site; venous or lymphatic stasis in the limb of the planned injection.\n* Active malignancy or anticancer treatment within the prior 12 months; a prior malignancy in documented remission may be enrolled at the investigator's discretion with documented rationale.\n* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, defined as HbA1c ≥ 8.5% on the most recent value within the prior 3 months; the investigator may also exclude for other objectively documented diabetes-related procedural or healing risk.\n* Prior joint replacement at the target joint.\n* Planned surgery during study participation.\n* Corticosteroid injection to the target joint(s) within the prior 6 weeks.\n* Concurrent enrollment in another interventional study for the same pain condition.\n* Active litigation or disability claim related to the target condition (to limit secondary-gain confounding of self-reported outcomes).\n* Pregnancy, or unwillingness to undergo pregnancy testing when fluoroscopy is planned (persons of childbearing potential).\n* Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},100,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23,24],"PHASE1","PHASE2","This clinical trial is designed to evaluate whether a stepwise injection-based treatment approach can reduce pain and improve function in adults with joint hypermobility, connective tissue laxity, and joint instability.\n\nJoint hypermobility occurs when joints move beyond their normal range, often because of looser connective tissue. For some patients, this can contribute to chronic pain, recurrent instability, reduced function, and disability. This study focuses on adults with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), or joint instability after injury who have already completed physical therapy without adequate relief.\n\nThe main question this study aims to answer is whether the first treatment step, dextrose prolotherapy, can reduce pain by 40% or more two weeks after the second injection.\n\nParticipants will receive treatment in a step-by-step sequence, based on their response:\n\nStep 1: Dextrose prolotherapy A dextrose-based injection used to stimulate a healing response in ligament, tendon, or joint-supporting tissue.\n\nStep 2: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) An injection prepared from the participant's own blood, designed to support tissue repair and recovery.\n\nStep 3: Doxycycline injections A low-dose injectable treatment used in this study to help protect joint-supporting tissue. It is not being used to treat infection.\n\nAlternative option: Hyaluronic acid injections An injection into the joint that may be offered if the earlier treatment steps do not provide enough improvement.\n\nEach treatment step begins with two injections, given approximately two weeks apart. If a participant improves by 40% or more, they may continue with that treatment pathway. If they do not improve enough, they may be offered the next step in the study.\n\nParticipants will be followed for up to 12 months, with study visits used to monitor pain, function, treatment response, and safety.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37],"Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Hypermobility Type (hEDS)","Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS)","Joint Hypermobility","Joint Instability","Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder","Chronic Pain Syndrome","Musculoskeletal Pain","Sprain","Subluxation","Dislocation","Craniocervical Disfunction",[39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,35,54,37,55],"prolotherapy","dextrose prolotherapy","platelet-rich plasma","PRP","doxycycline","regenerative medicine","joint hypermobility","hEDS","hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome","viscosupplementation","hyaluronic acid","step-care","ligament instability","MMP inhibition","dislocation","CCI","Craniocervical instability","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-07-08",{"date":59,"type":60},"2026-07-10","ACTUAL",{"date":62,"type":20},"2026-07-15",{"date":64,"type":20},"2028-12-31",{"name":66,"class":67},"Manhattan Pain Medicine, PLLC","OTHER",{"id":69,"slug":70,"hasResults":11,"nctId":71,"briefTitle":72,"officialTitle":73,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":74,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":75,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":77,"phases":4,"briefSummary":78,"conditions":79,"keywords":85,"overallStatus":90,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":91,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":92,"startDateStruct":94,"completionDateStruct":96,"leadSponsor":98,"locationsCount":101},"100641087","post-market-clinical-follow-up-pmcf-study-evaluating-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-tpmed-revision-hip-prosthesis-system-100641087","NCT07653295","Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tıpmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System","A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tıpmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals aged 18 years and older,\n* Male or female participants,\n* Participants who have undergone Revision Hip Arthroplasty (either total revision or partial component revision) for any indication (such as a documented joint failure or prosthesis-related clinical complication),\n* Participants in whose revision procedure the Tıpmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System components were utilized,\n* Participants who are not legally restricted (e.g., military personnel, convicts, or individuals under legal guardianship),\n* Participants who have voluntarily signed the written Informed Consent Form (ICF).\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects currently participating in any other interventional clinical trial.",{"count":76,"type":20},35,"OBSERVATIONAL","This is a multicenter, prospective, observational, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study designed to evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the Tipmed™ Revision Hip Prosthesis System in adult participants undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. The study aims to gather real-world clinical evidence on the 24-month post-operative safety profile, potential complications, and functional outcomes of the device during routine clinical practice.",[80,81,82,30,83,84],"Revision Hip Arthroplasty","Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic Joint","Prostheses-related Infections","Periprosthetic Fractures","Prosthesis Failure",[86,80,87,88,89],"Hip Prosthesis","Revision Hip Prosthesis","Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF)","Harris Hip Score (HHS)","RECRUITING","2026-06-17",{"date":93,"type":60},"2026-06-18",{"date":95,"type":60},"2024-03-12",{"date":97,"type":20},"2029-03-31",{"name":99,"class":100},"TIPMED Medical Device Manufacturing Ltd. Co.","INDUSTRY",4,{"id":103,"slug":104,"hasResults":11,"nctId":105,"briefTitle":106,"officialTitle":107,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":108,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":109,"enrollmentInfo":110,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":112,"briefSummary":114,"conditions":115,"keywords":118,"overallStatus":56,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":122,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":123,"startDateStruct":125,"completionDateStruct":127,"leadSponsor":129,"locationsCount":4},"100642937","neurocognitive-loading-following-anterior-shoulder-stabilization-a-randomized-controlled-trial-100642937","NCT07631819","Neurocognitive Loading Following Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Effects of Neurocognitive Loading on Neuromuscular Control, Kinesiophobia, and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: Participant must be between 18 and 45 years of age.\n* Diagnosis: Must have undergone arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery (e.g., Bankart repair, Latarjet, or remplissage techniques) within the past month due to traumatic, unilateral anterior shoulder instability.\n* Postoperative Timeline: Currently within postoperative days 10 to 28.\n* Baseline Activity Level: Pre-injury physical activity level must be a score of 3 or higher on the Tegner Activity Scale.\n* Consent: Participant must be willing and give voluntary informed consent to participate in the study.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hypermobility: Diagnosed generalized joint hypermobility syndrome, defined as a Beighton Score of 5 or higher.\n* Neurological or Systemic Conditions: Presence of any systemic, rheumatic, or neurological disorders.\n* Previous Surgical History: History of prior shoulder surgery or revision surgery on the affected side, with the exception of the primary anterior shoulder stabilization and an accompanying SLAP lesion repair.\n* Concomitant Structural Pathology: Concomitant rotator cuff tear larger than 1 centimeter. History of osteochondral lesions or acromioclavicular separation injuries.\n* Contralateral Limb Status: History of shoulder instability, shoulder surgery, or any shoulder injury within the past 6 months on the uninjured (contralateral) side.\n* Cognitive Impairment: A score of 24 or below on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).\n* Visual\u002FSensory Impairments: Any severe visual or sensory deficit that prevents interaction with visual-reactive training equipment.\n* Pregnancy: Current pregnancy.\n\nNon-compliance\u002FWithdrawal:\n\n* Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study.\n* Attendance of less than 80% of the scheduled supervised rehabilitation sessions.\n* Missing two consecutive clinical follow-up assessment sessions.","45 Years",{"count":111,"type":20},32,[113],"NA","The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if adding neurocognitive loading to standard shoulder rehabilitation improves physical and psychological recovery in adults who have undergone arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery (such as Bankart repair, Latarjet, or remplissage procedures).\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes adding neurocognitive loading exercises improve shoulder proprioception, muscle strength, and functional performance compared to standard therapy alone? Does this integrated training approach reduce the kinesiophobia? Does it lead to better overall clinical outcomes and improve psychological readiness to return to sports? Researchers will compare a group receiving standard shoulder exercises combined with dual-task neurocognitive loading (using light-based reaction systems and cognitive tasks) to a control group receiving standard shoulder rehabilitation alone. Participants will:Undergo supervised physical therapy sessions starting 10 days after surgery up to the 16th postoperative week (twice a week for the first 12 weeks, and once a week for weeks 13-16) alongside an assigned home exercise program. Complete neurocognitive loading tasks (if assigned to the intervention group) that challenge attention, quick decision-making, and visual reactions while executing physical movements. Attend detailed clinical evaluation sessions lasting about 60 minutes before the treatment starts, and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. These assessments include neurocognitive, functional and clinical tests, and questionnaires.",[116,30,117],"Shoulder Instability","Postoperative Care",[119,120,121],"proprioception","dual task training","neurocognitive training","2026-06-02",{"date":124,"type":60},"2026-06-08",{"date":126,"type":20},"2026-07-01",{"date":128,"type":20},"2029-07-01",{"name":130,"class":67},"Hacettepe University"]