[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"learning-curve\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:learning-curve":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,5,0,[8,48,109,134,162],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100623360","epifaith-resident-learning-curve-trial-100623360",false,"NCT07395622","EpiFaith Resident Learning Curve Trial","Impact of the EpiFaith® Syringe on the Learning Curve of Anesthesia Residents for the Labor Epidural Technique: A Quasi-Experimental Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Anesthesiology residents with fewer than 5 prior epidural placement experiences\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* anesthesiology residents with more than 5 prior epidural placement experiences",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},34,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","This study aims to evaluate the impact of the EpiFaith® syringe on the learning curve of anesthesia residents for the labor epidural technique. Anesthesia residents with prior experience placing \\< 5 labor epidurals will be enrolled. Their performance of 20 sequential labor epidural placements with either standard technique with a beveled glass syringe or the EpiFaith® syringe will be observed. Successful epidural placement over time with sequential epidural placement attempts will be measured between groups. The primary outcome will be rate of successful epidural placement. Success will be defined as a composite of 4 criteria: maximum 3 attempts for placement; no need to re-site at a different level; no required intervention by the supervising attending anesthesiologist; and adequate analgesia with a visual analog score (VAS) \\<3 at 30 minutes. We hypothesize that use of the EpiFaith® syringe will enable a faster learning curve for successful epidural placement. A cumulative sum chart (CUSUM) analysis will evaluate whether the EpiFaith® syringe causes deviation from the control learning curve. Secondary outcomes will include rate of inadvertent dural puncture and epidural replacement rate.",[27,28,29],"Epidural Analgesia","Epidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery","Learning Curve",[31,32,33,34],"labor epidural","learning curve","epidural syringe","anesthesia residents","RECRUITING","2026-08-19",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-08-21","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2023-09-01",{"date":43,"type":21},"2026-12-01",{"name":45,"class":46},"Brigham and Women's Hospital","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":55,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":89,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":100,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":101,"startDateStruct":103,"completionDateStruct":105,"leadSponsor":107,"locationsCount":47},"100454745","interventions-in-mathematics-and-cognitive-skills-100454745","NCT05201534","Interventions in Mathematics and Cognitive Skills","Interventions in Math Learning Disabilities: Cognitive and Neural Correlates","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Elementary school aged children starting from first grade (6-12 years old)\n2. IQ: Participants with a Full Scale IQ \\> 70 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scle of Intelligence (WASI-II).\n3. Identification of Mathematical Learning Disabilities: Scores below the 35th percentile percentile on symbolic number processing test in Numeracy Screener and two or more Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-IV) math subtests\n4. Identification of typically developing children: Scores at or above the 35th percentile percentile on symbolic number processing test in Numeracy Screener and all WIAT-IV math subtests\n5. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and no hearing impairments\n6. Inclusion in MRI scan session: Right-handed\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. History of neurological or psychiatric disorder (i.e., schizophrenia, psychosis, depression, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.)\n2. History of trauma involving head injury\n3. Consistent psychiatric medications\n4. Exclusion from MRI scan session: No major contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - braces, metal implants, pacemakers, vascular stents, metallic ear tubes, consistent exposure to metal, claustrophobia)","6 Years","12 Years",{"count":58,"type":21},180,[24],"The purpose of this study is to investigate neurocognitive mechanisms underlying response to intervention aimed at enhancing, and remediating weaknesses in, numerical skills in children, including those with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD).",[62,63,64,65,66,29,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88],"Math Learning Disability","Child Development","Developmental Disability","Learning Disabilities","Learning Disabled","Mathematics Disorder","Dyscalculia","Dyscalculia, Primary","Dyscalculia, Acquired","Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Mathematics","Individuality","Behavior, Child","Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms","Behavior","Decision Making","Neuronal Plasticity","Cognition","Cognition Disorder","Cognitive Dysfunction","Cognitive Change","Cognitive Impairment, Mild","Cognitive Developmental Delay","Cognitive Orientation","Cognitive Delay, Mild","Cognitive Deficits, Mild","Cognitive Abnormality","Neuroscience",[90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99],"Numerical skills in children","Low math abilities","Mathematical Learning Disabilities","Mathematical Concepts","Mathematics","Transfer, Psychology","Generalization, Psychology","Early Intervention, Educational","Neural Pathways","Neural Networks, Computer","2026-08-07",{"date":102,"type":39},"2026-08-11",{"date":104,"type":39},"2023-05-05",{"date":106,"type":21},"2027-08-31",{"name":108,"class":46},"Stanford University",{"id":110,"slug":111,"hasResults":11,"nctId":112,"briefTitle":113,"officialTitle":113,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":114,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":115,"enrollmentInfo":116,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":118,"briefSummary":119,"conditions":120,"keywords":123,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":125,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":126,"startDateStruct":128,"completionDateStruct":130,"leadSponsor":132,"locationsCount":47},"100648381","randomized-controlled-trial-of-multi-patient-ct-derived-digital-twin-anatomical-variability-training-to-shorten-the-clinical-learning-curve-for-bronchoscopy-100648381","NCT07718451","Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-Patient CT-Derived Digital Twin Anatomical Variability Training to Shorten the Clinical Learning Curve for Bronchoscopy","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nTrainee Participants:\n\n1. Residents, fellows, or specialty trainees in pulmonary medicine, critical care medicine, thoracic surgery, anesthesiology, or related specialties whose training programs require flexible bronchoscopy training.\n2. Previously performed ≤5 flexible bronchoscopies as primary operator.\n3. No prior formal bronchoscopy simulation training course experience.\n4. Able and willing to provide written informed consent and permit use of training logs, procedural videos, Ontario Bronchoscopy Assessment Tool (OBAT) scores, and clinical learning curve data for research purposes.\n\nPatient Participants:\n\n1. Age ≥18 years.\n2. Scheduled to undergo elective low-risk or low-to-moderate-risk diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy.\n3. Clinically suitable for supervised novice-performed airway inspection, bronchoalveolar lavage, simple brushing, or other low-risk sampling procedures considered safe by the supervising bronchoscopist.\n4. Able to understand and provide written informed consent and willing to complete pre-procedure anxiety and post-procedure experience questionnaires.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nTrainee Participants:\n\n1. Previously performed \\>5 flexible bronchoscopies or previously completed a structured bronchoscopy simulation training program.\n2. Planned departure from the training program during the study period or anticipated inability to complete follow-up through at least clinical cases 1-30.\n3. Unable to participate in simulation training or unwilling to permit procedural video recording.\n4. Significant additional bronchoscopy training exposure outside the study protocol; such cases may not necessarily be excluded but will be documented and addressed in sensitivity analyses.\n\nPatient Participants:\n\n1. Emergency bronchoscopy, intubated intensive care unit patients, severe hypoxemia, or significant hemodynamic instability.\n2. Therapeutic bronchoscopy, complex central airway stenosis, high bleeding risk, procedures requiring advanced interventional techniques, or cases considered unsuitable for novice participation.\n3. Complex sampling procedures such as EBUS-TBNA, transbronchial lung biopsy, or cryobiopsy will not be included in the primary endpoint case set and may be analyzed separately as exploratory subgroups or in future studies.\n4. Refusal of trainee participation or refusal of procedural recording and\u002For questionnaire completion.","75 Years",{"count":117,"type":21},110,[24],"This study aims to determine whether multi-patient CT-derived digital twin anatomical variability training can shorten the early clinical learning curve of novice bronchoscopists compared with conventional anatomically uniform bronchoscopy simulation training.",[121,122,29],"Bronchoscopy","Learning Curves and Outcomes of Simulation-based Training",[124,32],"bronchoscopy","2026-07-17",{"date":127,"type":39},"2026-07-22",{"date":129,"type":39},"2026-05-20",{"date":131,"type":21},"2027-12-30",{"name":133,"class":46},"Gang Hou",{"id":135,"slug":136,"hasResults":11,"nctId":137,"briefTitle":138,"officialTitle":139,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":140,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":141,"enrollmentInfo":142,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":144,"briefSummary":145,"conditions":146,"keywords":148,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":153,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":154,"startDateStruct":156,"completionDateStruct":158,"leadSponsor":160,"locationsCount":47},"100588200","comparison-between-the-i-gel-and-protector-supraglottic-airway-devices-100588200","NCT06938308","Comparison Between the I-gel and Protector Supraglottic Airway Devices","Comparison Between the I-gel and Protector Supraglottic Airway Devices in Patients Under General Anesthesia","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* ASA I-II\n* Patients older than 18 years\n* Procedures in supine and lithotomy position\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Tumors or anatomical anomalies of the upper airway\n* Known history of difficult intubation\n* Limited mouth opening less than 2cm\n* Decreased compliance of the lungs or the thoracic cage\n* Need of mechanical ventilation after the surgery","90 Years",{"count":143,"type":21},200,[24],"This study aims to compare the learning curves of two different laryngeal mask airway devices, by evaluating their placement in adult patients performed by anesthesiology residents",[147,29],"Airway Management",[149,150,32,151,152],"I-gel","Protector","LMA","airway","2025-06-26",{"date":155,"type":39},"2025-06-27",{"date":157,"type":39},"2025-04-22",{"date":159,"type":21},"2025-09-15",{"name":161,"class":46},"Nikolopoulou Maria Zozefin",{"id":163,"slug":164,"hasResults":11,"nctId":165,"briefTitle":166,"officialTitle":167,"acronym":168,"eligibilityCriteria":169,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":170,"minAge":18,"maxAge":141,"enrollmentInfo":171,"targetDuration":173,"studyType":174,"phases":4,"briefSummary":175,"conditions":176,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":183,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":184,"startDateStruct":186,"completionDateStruct":188,"leadSponsor":190,"locationsCount":192},"100537548","national-robotics-assisted-radical-prostatectomy-database-100537548","NCT06279260","National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database","National Robotics-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Database: Exploring Learning Curves and Long Term Surgical, Oncological and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS)","RASOR","Inclusion Criteria:\n\nTo be eligible to participate in this database, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:\n\n1. Individuals who consent to participate,\n2. within the age range of 18 to 90 years,\n3. confirmed diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (PCa)\n4. patients receiving medical attention at hospitals engaged in collaborative efforts with the designated database.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Participants are not eligible to take part in the database:\n2. Individuals who have not undergone robotic surgery for prostatectomy or TP biopsy. ,\n3. without a diagnosis of prostate cancer or\n4. who decline to provide consent for the collection of their health information\n5. Under the age of 18 years.","MALE",{"count":172,"type":21},10000,"5 Years","OBSERVATIONAL","In Australia, nearly 70 men are diagnosed with Prostate cancer every day. Prostate removal (Radical Prostatectomy) is the proven treatment option to control cancer spread. Most of the prostate removal surgeries are done using robots. Robotic assisted prostate removal surgeries have been invented to minimise the risk of side effects post-surgery. Doctors prefer the robots over open surgery as there are benefits to patients (shorter hospital stays, lesser blood loss and better quality of life) and surgeons (better dexterity, improved field of vision and less pain). However, the cost of the robot outweighs the benefits at present and there is very less information concerning the long-term outcomes for patients.\n\nStudies conducted so far are small scale studies and the results from these studies cannot be generalized to the population at large in Australia. So, there is need for a largescale study that will look at the long-term outcomes and the factors that impact robotic surgeries across the metropolitan and rural hospital sectors.\n\nHence, this comprehensive database has been setup to collaborate with major hospitals, across metropolitan and rural areas in Australia. Through this database, researchers will be able to explore the diagnostic pathway for Prostate cancer and understand the long-term benefits of robotic surgery through patient reported questionnaires. Outcomes from this database will also help compare the quality of care against other powerhouses of robotic surgery.\n\nEventually, the database aims to standardize diagnostic pathways and clinical notes that are the same across different hospitals conducting robotic-assisted surgeries for Prostatectomy and improve care for prostate cancer patients across the country.",[177,178,179,180,181,182,29],"Database","Prostate Cancer","Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy","Surgical Outcomes","Oncological Outcomes","Patient Reported Outcome Measures","2024-08-22",{"date":185,"type":39},"2024-08-26",{"date":187,"type":39},"2024-07-01",{"date":189,"type":21},"2050-12",{"name":191,"class":46},"Melbourne Health",8]