[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"partial-edentulism-class-1\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:partial-edentulism-class-1":29},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,48],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":19,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":47},"100647847","internal-irrigation-surgery-100647847",false,"NCT07715825","Internal Irrigation Surgery","Evaluation of an Internal Irrigation Surgical Guide to Reduce Heat Generation During Dental Implant Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients aged 25+\n2. Patients requiring a dental implant in the maxilla or mandible\n3. Patients with sufficient bone volume for implant placement.\n4. Patients classified as ASA I or II based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system.\n5. Patients capable of providing informed consent and willing to adhere to study procedures and follow-up appointments.\n6. Patients with adequate interarch space to accommodate guided implant surgery.\n7. No history of implant placement at the experimental or control site.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. ASA class 3 or higher\n2. Currently undergoing or history of bisphosphonate or antiresorptive therapy\n3. Patients who have received prior radiation therapy to the head and neck.\n4. Patients with contraindications for implant placement, such as active infections or severe periodontal disease.\n5. Pregnant or breastfeeding\n6. Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions impairing informed consent or compliance",true,"ALL","25 Years","75 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},40,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","Heat generated during osteotomy and implant placement may cause thermal injury to bone and adversely affect healing and osseointegration. External irrigation is commonly used to reduce heat generation; however, cooling may be less effective at the drill-bone interface, particularly during guided implant surgery.\n\nSurgical guides with integrated irrigation channels have been developed to deliver coolant more directly to the osteotomy site, but clinical evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. This study will evaluate whether an internal irrigation surgical guide system reduces heat generation during osteotomy compared with a conventional guided implant surgery approach. The study will also assess clinical outcomes associated with implant placement. The findings may help inform safer and more effective protocols for guided dental implant surgery.",[28,29,30,31],"Dental Implant Healing","Partial Edentulism Class 1","Partial Edentulism Class II","Partial Edentulism Class 3",[33,34],"dental implant surgery","dental implant placement","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-08-03",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-08-06","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":22},"2026-09-01",{"date":43,"type":22},"2028-12-31",{"name":45,"class":46},"University of Maryland, Baltimore","OTHER",1,{"id":49,"slug":50,"hasResults":11,"nctId":51,"briefTitle":52,"officialTitle":53,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":54,"healthyVolunteers":16,"sex":17,"minAge":55,"maxAge":56,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":63,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":64,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":65,"startDateStruct":67,"completionDateStruct":69,"leadSponsor":71,"locationsCount":47},"100567315","short-implant-versus-crestal-standard-length-implant-to-retain-class-1-removable-partial-denture-100567315","NCT06666595","Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Class 1 Removable Partial Denture.","Clinical Outcome of Subcrestal Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Kennedy Class 1 Removable Partial Denture: A Split-mouth Study","Inclusion Criteria\n\n* adult patients aged 50 years or older with class 1 RPD with missing mandibular molars at least and complaining from instability of the prosthesis were recruited.\n* Medical history revealed no contraindication to implant therapy.\n* Patients have an amount of bone nearly equal to 8 mm length above the inferior alveolar canal to receive a 6 mm short implant with 2 mm subcrestal to the bone level with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on one side and an amount of bone equal to or more than 8 mm to receive a standard-length implant of 7.5, 9, or 10.5 mm placed at crestal bone level with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on the contralateral side which was examined by CBCT.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of active infection or inflammation in the areas intended for implant placement; \\*systemic diseases such as diabetes.\n* Pregnant and lactating patients.\n* Habit of severe bruxism or clenching.\n* Treatment with therapeutic radiation to the head within the past 12 months.\n* Treatment with bisphosphonate within the past 12 months.\n* More than 10 cigarettes\u002Fday smoking habit.","50 Years","70 Years",{"count":58,"type":22},30,[25],"Objective: To report the implant survival rates, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of subcrestal short implant versus crestal standard length implant supported removable partial denture (RPD).",[62,29],"Bone Loss","RECRUITING","2024-10-29",{"date":66,"type":39},"2024-10-30",{"date":68,"type":39},"2021-01-04",{"date":70,"type":22},"2025-08-01",{"name":72,"class":46},"Menoufia University"]