[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"patient-satisfaction\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:patient-satisfaction":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":7,"results":8},null,47,0,25,[9,43,76,103,130,155,189,217,246,275,301,327,356,383,407,434,464,498,525,551,583,610,632,657,686],{"id":10,"slug":11,"hasResults":12,"nctId":13,"briefTitle":14,"officialTitle":15,"acronym":16,"eligibilityCriteria":17,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":31,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":32,"startDateStruct":35,"completionDateStruct":37,"leadSponsor":39,"locationsCount":42},"100368472","radial-vs-state-of-the-art-femoral-access-for-bleeding-and-access-site-complication-reduction-in-cardiac-catheterization-rebirth-100368472",false,"NCT04077762","Radial vs. State-Of-The-Art Femoral Access for Bleeding and Access Site Complication Reduction in Cardiac Catheterization (REBIRTH)","Radial vs. State-Of-The-Art Femoral Access for Bleeding and Access SIte Complication Reduction in Cardiac Catheterization (REBIRTH)","REBIRTH","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age 18 years and older\n* Undergoing diagnostic angiography for ischemic symptoms with possible PCI, or undergoing planned urgent or elective PCI\n* Has provided informed consent and agrees to participate\n* Patients must be equally eligible to undergo cardiac catheterization via radial or femoral access\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Primary PCI for STEMI\n* Planned right heart catheterization\n* Valvular heart disease requiring valve surgery within 30 days after the index procedure\n* Hemodialysis access (arteriovenous fistula or graft) in the arm to be used for PCI in case of assignment to radial approach (the opposite arm may be used for radial access if a dialysis graft is present in one)\n* Peripheral arterial disease prohibiting vascular access\n* Presence of bilateral internal mammary artery coronary bypass grafts\n* International normalized ratio ≥1.5 while treated with oral vitamin K antagonists (i.e. warfarin) Receipt of oral factor Xa or IIa inhibitors ≤24 h before procedure\n* Planned staged PCI within 30 days after index procedure.\n* Any planned surgeries within 30 days after index procedure\n* Planned dual arterial access (for example for chronic total occlusion PCI)\n* Coexisting conditions that limit life expectancy to less than 30 days\n* Positive pregnancy test","ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},3266,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This is a phase IV, prospective, open label, randomized-controlled study that will compare radial access with state-of-the-art femoral access in patients without ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing cardiac catheterization. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 into 2 treatment groups: radial access and state-of-the-art femoral access. Randomization will be performed in blocks of 50 per site. Similarly, a second sub-randomization will be performed in the femoral access group into use of 18 vs 21 gauge needles, also in a 1:1 fashion.",[28,29],"Patient Satisfaction","Vascular Access Complication","RECRUITING","2026-08-17",{"date":33,"type":34},"2026-08-19","ACTUAL",{"date":36,"type":34},"2019-11-15",{"date":38,"type":22},"2028-08-19",{"name":40,"class":41},"Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation","OTHER",6,{"id":44,"slug":45,"hasResults":12,"nctId":46,"briefTitle":47,"officialTitle":48,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":49,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":51,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":53,"briefSummary":54,"conditions":55,"keywords":59,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":66,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":67,"startDateStruct":69,"completionDateStruct":71,"leadSponsor":73,"locationsCount":75},"100649585","lavender-sandalwood-aromatherapy-study-100649585","NCT07737392","Lavender Sandalwood Aromatherapy Study","Does Aromatherapy Improve Mood and Reduce Pain in Women After Scheduled Cesarean Procedures?","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients scheduled for a planned cesarean section\n* Undergoing pre-admission testing\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Individuals under 18 years of age\n* High-risk pregnancies\n* Patients not admitted to the postpartum unit following delivery\n* Individuals with known allergies to essential oils\n* Patients whose newborns require admission to the NICU\n* Patients originally scheduled for a cesarean section but admitted to the labor and delivery unit before the planned procedure","FEMALE",{"count":52,"type":22},182,[25],"The purpose of this randomized controlled study is to explore whether lavender sandalwood aromatherapy can support comfort, mood, pain relief, and overall satisfaction for participants recovering from a scheduled cesarean section without complications. The main questions this study aims to answer are:\n\n* How does lavender sandalwood aromatherapy affect participants' mood during postpartum recovery after a cesarean section?\n* Does lavender sandalwood aromatherapy help reduce pain during recovery?\n* Does lavender sandalwood aromatherapy improve participants' overall satisfaction with their recovery experience? Researchers will compare participants who receive lavender-sandalwood aromatherapy with those who do not to determine whether it improves mood, reduces pain, and enhances patient satisfaction.\n\nParticipants will be asked to:\n\n* Wear aromatherapy tabs on their gown for 24 hours.\n* Have the aromatherapy tabs applied 24 hours after the cesarean section and removed 48 hours after the cesarean section.\n* Complete surveys at 24 hours and 48 hours after the cesarean section. This will apply to both the control and intervention groups.",[56,57,28,58],"Pain","Mood","Scheduled Cesarean Sections",[60,56,57,61,62,63,64],"Post C\u002Fsection","Aromatherapy","Lavender","Sandalwood","Patient satisfaction","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-08-10",{"date":68,"type":34},"2026-08-12",{"date":70,"type":22},"2026-09",{"date":72,"type":22},"2027-12",{"name":74,"class":41},"Memorial Hermann Health System",1,{"id":77,"slug":78,"hasResults":12,"nctId":79,"briefTitle":80,"officialTitle":81,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":82,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":50,"minAge":83,"maxAge":84,"enrollmentInfo":85,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":87,"briefSummary":88,"conditions":89,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":93,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":94,"startDateStruct":96,"completionDateStruct":98,"leadSponsor":100,"locationsCount":75},"100317666","perioperative-music-listening-on-anxiety-pain-analgesia-use-and-patient-satisfaction-100317666","NCT03415620","Perioperative Music Listening on Anxiety, Pain, Analgesia Use and Patient Satisfaction","The Use of Perioperative Music Listening on Anxiety, Pain, Analgesia Use and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Healthy participants who are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 (with well-controlled medical problems);\n* Undergo day surgery, same-day-admission gynecologic surgery or cesarean section;\n* No hearing impairment.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients with significant respiratory disease and obstructive sleep apnea;\n* Patients who are unable to read and understand the hospital anxiety questionnaire.","21 Years","70 Years",{"count":86,"type":22},410,[25],"The use of music to relieve pain has been studied in many forms of medicines and has been proven to reduce anxiety, pain and analgesic use in the perioperative setting. However, music listening as an inexpensive and duplicable method has not been investigated and implemented in the local context. The investigators hereby propose a prospective study to recruit patients undergoing surgery to evaluate the effectiveness of music in pain relief and post-operative recovery; as well as the implementation and operational readiness of music listening.",[90,56,91,28,92],"Music","Anxiety","Analgesia","2026-08-04",{"date":95,"type":34},"2026-08-07",{"date":97,"type":34},"2018-01-03",{"date":99,"type":22},"2027-12-31",{"name":101,"class":102},"KK Women's and Children's Hospital","OTHER_GOV",{"id":104,"slug":105,"hasResults":12,"nctId":106,"briefTitle":107,"officialTitle":108,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":109,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":111,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":113,"briefSummary":114,"conditions":115,"keywords":118,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":121,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":122,"startDateStruct":124,"completionDateStruct":126,"leadSponsor":128,"locationsCount":75},"100649916","evaluating-the-effectiveness-of-an-ai-powered-physician-assistant-in-improving-patients-and-physicians-satisfaction-in-anaesthesiology-clinics-100649916","NCT07743320","Evaluating the Effectiveness of an AI-Powered Physician Assistant in Improving Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction in Anaesthesiology Clinics","Evaluating the Effectiveness of an AI-Powered Physician Assistant in Improving Patients' and Physicians' Satisfaction in Anaesthesiology Clinics of a Tertiary Care Hospital","Patients and Patients' Proxies\n\nInclusion Criteria:\n\n* Consent to participate\n* Age 18 years and above\n* Initial patients\n* Possession of a phone\n* Read and write Urdu and\u002For English\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Emergency Care patients\n* Follow-up patients\n\nPhysicians:\n\nInclusion Criteria\n\n* Attending or Consultant Physician\n* Consent to participate\n* Workflow integrated with AI Assistant\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n\\- Residents and Senior Medical Officers",true,{"count":112,"type":22},180,[25],"This trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an AI-Powered Physician Assistant in improving patients' satisfaction with the quality of care. It also aims to evaluate physicians' satisfaction with the integration of a Physician Assistant into their clinical workflows. The primary research question is\n\nA. What is the effect of an AI-powered Physician Assistant on patients' satisfaction with their quality of care compared to the standard care?\n\nThe secondary questions are as follows:\n\nB1. How satisfied are physicians with integrating an AI-powered physician assistant into their daily clinical workflows?\n\nB2. Which factors are significantly associated with patient satisfaction regarding the AI-Powered Physician Assistant?\n\nB3. Is there a statistically significant difference in mean consultation time per patient between those receiving AI-assisted care and those receiving only standard of careonly ?\n\nParticipants will be enrolled from pre-operative outpatient clinics, including patients attending clinic for anaesthetic clearance prior to surgery and consultant anaesthetists providing care.\n\nPatients will serve as the unit of randomization and will be assigned to one of two study arms on each clinic day. On each clinic day, the first 8 eligible patients presenting for consultation will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. Intervention patients will proceed to a dedicated waiting room for structured digital intake via an AI platform (demographics, symptoms, history, clinical data) and receive AI-assisted care. Control group patients will undergo routine standard care protocols. The consultant physician will evaluate both arms during each clinic session, reviewing physician assistant-generated patient summaries and charts for patients in both the intervention and control groups.\n\nEach patient will be asked to fill out the survey at the end of the consultation with the physician. The consultants will be requested to fill out a survey at the end of the day.",[116,28,117],"Quality of Care","Physician Satisfaction",[119,28,116,117,120],"Artificial Intelligence","Workflow Efficiency","2026-07-31",{"date":123,"type":34},"2026-08-03",{"date":125,"type":22},"2026-08-30",{"date":127,"type":22},"2026-10-30",{"name":129,"class":41},"Aga Khan University",{"id":131,"slug":132,"hasResults":12,"nctId":133,"briefTitle":134,"officialTitle":135,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":136,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":137,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":139,"briefSummary":140,"conditions":141,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":146,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":147,"startDateStruct":149,"completionDateStruct":151,"leadSponsor":153,"locationsCount":75},"100602514","regional-anesthesia-in-tka-impact-on-postoperative-joint-motion-and-patient-satisfaction-100602514","NCT07124494","Regional Anesthesia in TKA: Impact on Postoperative Joint Motion and Patient Satisfaction","Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Anesthesia Methods Applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Joint Range of Motion in the Postoperative Period and Patient Satisfaction","* Minimum Age: 18 Years\n* Maximum Age: None\n* Sex: All\n* Gender Based: No\n* Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No\n* Inclusion Criteria:\n\n  * Scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty\n  * Age ≥ 18 years\n  * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III\n  * Accepting neuraxial anesthesia\n* Exclusion Criteria:\n\n  * Skin infection at the planned injection site\n  * Sepsis\n  * Coagulopathy\n  * Refusal of neuraxial anesthesia\n  * Severe hypovolemia\n  * Demyelinating central nervous system disease\n  * Age under 18 years\n  * Illiterate in Turkish\n  * Non-cooperative patients\n  * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine",{"count":138,"type":22},30,[25],"This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to evaluate the effects of different regional anesthesia\u002Fanalgesia techniques on postoperative knee range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Ninety patients undergoing elective TKA under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) spinal anesthesia with epidural catheter, 2) spinal anesthesia followed by adductor canal catheterization, and 3) spinal anesthesia with multimodal intravenous analgesia. The primary outcome is postoperative knee joint ROM measured on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, postoperative opioid consumption, and VAS scores. The study is conducted at Konya City Hospital and will be completed over a 6-month period.",[142,143,144,145,28],"Total Knee Arthroplasty","Postoperative Pain","Regional Anesthesia","Knee Range of Motion","2026-07-21",{"date":148,"type":34},"2026-07-22",{"date":150,"type":34},"2025-08-05",{"date":152,"type":22},"2026-12-19",{"name":154,"class":41},"Konya City Hospital",{"id":156,"slug":157,"hasResults":12,"nctId":158,"briefTitle":159,"officialTitle":160,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":161,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":162,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":165,"conditions":166,"keywords":170,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":179,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":180,"startDateStruct":182,"completionDateStruct":184,"leadSponsor":186,"locationsCount":188},"100645797","rutiss-diary-and-rutiss-65-study-100645797","NCT07698041","RUTISS-Diary and RUTISS-65 Study","Developing and Validating Two New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms: A Symptoms Diary and Adapted Measure for Older Adults","Inclusion for RUTISS-Diary:\n\n* Participants must be 18 years and older\n* All participants must have native\u002Fbilingual or advanced fluency in English.\n* Access to a computer\u002Fmobile device for survey completion.\n* Symptoms-led diagnosis: Participants must report that they experience recurrent UTI episodes or symptoms. They must report the minimum of 2 UTIs in 6 months or 3 in 12 months, in line with the rUTI diagnostic criteria (European Association of Urology, 2020).\n\nInclusion for RUTISS- 65:\n\n* Participants must be 65 years and older\n* Access to a computer\u002Fmobile device for survey completion, paper copy available upon request.\n* All participants must have native\u002Fbilingual or advanced fluency in English.\n* Symptoms-led diagnosis: Participants must report that they experience recurrent UTI episodes or symptoms. They must report the minimum of 2 UTIs in 6 months or 3 in 12 months, in line with the rUTI diagnostic criteria (European Association of Urology, 2020).\n\nExclusion criteria (for RUTISS-Diary and RUTISS-65)\n\n* Participants must not report a current diagnosis of interstitial cystitis (measured in demographics questionnaire).\n* Symptoms of cognitive confusion or dementia.\n* No active malignancy e.g. bladder or prostate cancer\n* Participants must not report beginner or intermediate level fluency in English. Future work will be done to translate the PROMs into alternative languages.\n* In addition to the interstitial cystitis exclusion question, participants will also be asked in the demographic questionnaire if they are pregnant or have an indwelling catheter or use intermittent self-catheterisation. Participants who report \"yes\" to either of these will be excluded from participation.",{"count":163,"type":22},200,"OBSERVATIONAL","Existing patient-reported outcome measures assess acute urinary tract infection but do not support daily symptom tracking in recurrent UTI (rUTI) or meet the needs of older adults. This single-site study will develop and validate two adapted measures: the RUTISS-Diary for daily symptom monitoring and the RUTISS-65 for reporting symptoms in adults aged 65 years and over. Approximately 200 participants with rUTI will complete the RUTISS-Diary daily for 7 days and again on day 14. Participants aged 65 years and over will also complete the RUTISS-65 on days 1 and 2 to assess its reliability and validity.",[167,168,28,169],"Urology","Urological Diseases","Pain, Chronic",[171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178],"recurrent urinary tract infection","rUTI","outcome measure","PROMs","urinary","UTI","burden","assessment tools","2026-07-06",{"date":181,"type":34},"2026-07-13",{"date":183,"type":22},"2026-07-08",{"date":185,"type":22},"2027-12-24",{"name":187,"class":41},"Katherine Finlay",2,{"id":190,"slug":191,"hasResults":12,"nctId":192,"briefTitle":193,"officialTitle":194,"acronym":195,"eligibilityCriteria":196,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":197,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":199,"conditions":200,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":207,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":208,"startDateStruct":210,"completionDateStruct":212,"leadSponsor":214,"locationsCount":216},"100523843","patient-reported-outcome-and-patient-reported-experience-after-status-epilepticus-100523843","NCT06100978","Patient-reported Outcome and Patient-reported Experience After Status Epilepticus","Patient-reported Outcomes in Status Epilepticus Requiring Intensive Care Unit Management. A Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study","POSEIDON2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adults 18 years old or older\n* Patients previously included in the ICTAL registry (Status Epilepticus cohort NCT03457831)\n* Survivors after ICU management for Status Epilepticus More than 3 months and less than 5 years after ICU discharge\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Legal guardianship\n* Opposition to participate\n* Unread and unwritten French language\n* Patient not affiliated to a Social Security system",{"count":198,"type":22},145,"Status epilepticus (SE) is a common life-threatening neurological emergency in which prolonged or multiple closely spaced seizures can result in long-term impairments. SE remains associated with considerable mortality and morbidity, with little progress over the last three decades. The proportion of patients who die in the hospital is about 20% overall and 40% in patients with refractory SE. Morbidity is more difficult to evaluate, as adverse effects of SE are often difficult to differentiate from those attributed to the cause of SE. Our experience suggests that nearly 50% of patients may experience long-term functional impairments. The precise description of the consequences of these functional impairments and their impact on quality of life after SE requiring intensive care management has been little studied. Indeed, if cognitive, physical and mental impairments are now identified in the populations of patients who required intensive care under the term postresuscitation syndrome (PICS), neuronal lesions consecutive to the SE itselfor to its cause could be responsible for these different functional alterations.\n\nThus, the following have been described: (i) cognitive disorders in the areas of attention, executive functions and verbal fluency, visual and working memory disorders, but also spatio-temporal disorders; (ii) physical disorders such as the so-called post-resuscitation polyneuromyopathy; and (iii) mental disorders such as anxiety disorders, depressive states or those related to post-traumatic stress.\n\nAssessment and characterization of patient-reported outcomes is essential to complement the holistic assessment of clinically relevant outcomes from the patient's perspective. The POSEIDON study was a cross-sectional collection of PROs and HR-QOL components, and associated with patient functional outcomes, in those who required ICU management for status epilepticus. We propose here to continue the description of potential alterations after a subsequent ME, namely a longitudinal study (POSEIDON 2) which will also include the evaluation of patient-reported experience (PREMS) and the measurement of family burden.",[201,28,202,203,204,205,206],"Patient Reported Outcomes","Long Term Outcomes","Status Epilepticus","Intensive Care Unit","Burden","Relatives","2026-07-03",{"date":209,"type":34},"2026-07-07",{"date":211,"type":34},"2024-05-25",{"date":213,"type":22},"2027-03-25",{"name":215,"class":41},"Versailles Hospital",19,{"id":218,"slug":219,"hasResults":12,"nctId":220,"briefTitle":221,"officialTitle":222,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":223,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":225,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":227,"briefSummary":228,"conditions":229,"keywords":232,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":237,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":238,"startDateStruct":240,"completionDateStruct":242,"leadSponsor":244,"locationsCount":4},"100639382","the-impact-of-ai-powered-training-on-gynecological-examination-anxiety-and-satisfaction-100639382","NCT07599358","The Impact of AI-Powered Training on Gynecological Examination Anxiety and Satisfaction","Digital Transformation in Women's Health: The Impact of AI-Powered Training on Gynecological Examination Anxiety and Satisfaction","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Applying to the outpatient clinic for a gynecological examination\n* Being between 18-65 years of age\n* Agreeing to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Communication barrier\n* Having a psychological diagnosis,\n* Being pregnant","65 Years",{"count":226,"type":22},114,[25],"Gynecological cancers, particularly cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, pose a global problem. Cervical cancers are quite common worldwide, and this rate is even higher in developing countries. Cervical cancers are easily treatable when detected early, and screening is quite easy. Diagnosis is routinely made through human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytological screening. Eliminating anxiety, fear, and uncertainty about gynecological examinations makes the examination process easier, thus enabling early diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Keeping up with developing and changing technology and using it to improve women's health is an undeniable change in recent times. This study aims to determine the effect of an AI-assisted informational training program on women's anxiety and satisfaction levels regarding gynecological examinations.",[230,231,28,91],"Gynecological Examination","Artificial Intelligence (AI)",[233,234,235,236],"gynecological examination","artificial intelligence","patient satisfaction","anxiety","2026-05-14",{"date":239,"type":34},"2026-05-20",{"date":241,"type":22},"2026-05-02",{"date":243,"type":22},"2026-09-29",{"name":245,"class":41},"Fenerbahce University",{"id":247,"slug":248,"hasResults":12,"nctId":249,"briefTitle":250,"officialTitle":251,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":252,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":253,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":255,"briefSummary":256,"conditions":257,"keywords":258,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":266,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":267,"startDateStruct":269,"completionDateStruct":271,"leadSponsor":273,"locationsCount":75},"100590568","music-use-in-parturients-admitted-to-labor--delivery-100590568","NCT06969105","Music Use in Parturients Admitted to Labor & Delivery","A Randomized Controlled Trial of Music Use in Parturients Admitted to Labor & Delivery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age: 18 years or older\n* Laboring parturients or those scheduled for an induction of labor\n* Able to provide informed consent\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status rating of II-III\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patient refusal\n* Impaired hearing\n* Patient is taking at least one anxiolytic medication daily at baseline\n* Intrauterine fetal demise\n* Severe psychiatric disorder",{"count":254,"type":22},106,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if music use affects anxiety or pain levels in parturients admitted to labor and delivery. It will also learn about the effect of music use on patient satisfaction. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\nDoes music use affect anxiety levels in parturients admitted to labor and delivery? Does music use affect pain levels in parturients admitted to labor and delivery? Does music use affect patient satisfaction in parturients admitted to labor and delivery?\n\nResearchers will compare music to a control (no music) to see if music affects anxiety levels in parturients admitted to labor and delivery.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nListen to music or listen to no music for a 10 minute duration in the labor and delivery unit.\n\nAnswer questions about anxiety and pain levels at a few different timepoints. Have information collected from medical charts (vital signs and cervical dilation).\n\nRate their satisfaction with care.",[91,56,28],[259,260,261,236,262,263,264,265],"music","labor and delivery","parturients","analgesia","anesthesia","pain","epidural","2026-04-30",{"date":268,"type":34},"2026-05-01",{"date":270,"type":34},"2025-05-30",{"date":272,"type":22},"2027-05",{"name":274,"class":41},"Tufts Medical Center",{"id":276,"slug":277,"hasResults":12,"nctId":278,"briefTitle":279,"officialTitle":280,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":281,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":282,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":283,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":285,"briefSummary":286,"conditions":287,"keywords":289,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":293,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":294,"startDateStruct":295,"completionDateStruct":297,"leadSponsor":299,"locationsCount":4},"100624941","reducing-waiting-time-for-vision-refraction-services-100624941","NCT07416175","Reducing Waiting Time for Vision Refraction Services","Reducing Waiting Time for Vision Refraction Services in an Eye Care OPD: an Operational Research Study","Inclusion Criteria: All patients awaiting vision refraction services. -\n\nExclusion Criteria: Patients aged less than 19 years.\n\n\\-","19 Years",{"count":284,"type":22},350,[25],"The Out-Patient Departments (OPD) is often the first point of contact for patients seeking healthcare services and involves the coordination of both administrative and clinical processes. High patient volume and inefficient patient flow can result in prolonged waiting time, contributing to patient dissatisfaction. We performed a root cause analysis (RCA) through group interviews with OPD patients visiting Geta Eye Hospital, Nepal to understand the factors contributing to dissatisfaction towards OPD waiting time. In addition, patient flow through OPD service points was mapped, time-in, time-out and waiting time across OPD rooms was recorded to identify operational bottlenecks for intervention.\n\nThe Vision Refraction room (VRR) emerged as key contributor to prolonged waiting time. This operational research study aims to determine the reasons for delay in the VRR and develop strategies to reduce the mean waiting time and improve patient satisfaction with waiting time. This study will be conducted over a 6-8 month period using a two-phase before and after intervention design. Phase 1 will establish baseline waiting time and patient satisfaction, and identify operational challenges. Based on these findings, context-specific interventions will be developed and implemented in Phase 2, and waiting time and patient satisfaction will be reassessed.",[28,288],"Waiting Times, Patient Pathways, Effect of Lifestyle-related, Clinical and Demographic Parameters on Outcomes",[290,64,291,292],"Waiting time","Operational research","Quality improvement","2026-04-29",{"date":266,"type":34},{"date":296,"type":22},"2026-06",{"date":298,"type":22},"2026-12",{"name":300,"class":41},"Seva Canada Society",{"id":302,"slug":303,"hasResults":12,"nctId":304,"briefTitle":305,"officialTitle":306,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":307,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":308,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":309,"briefSummary":310,"conditions":311,"keywords":313,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":318,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":319,"startDateStruct":321,"completionDateStruct":323,"leadSponsor":325,"locationsCount":75},"100636272","early-oral-hydration-in-relieving-postoperative-thirst-100636272","NCT07563530","Early Oral Hydration in Relieving Postoperative Thirst","Effectiveness of Early Oral Hydration in Relieving Postoperative Thirst in Patients Undergoing Urological Endoscopic Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male and female patients aged 18-65 years.\n2. Scheduled for elective urological endoscopic procedures under general anesthesia.\n3. Day-care endoscopic procedures.\n4. ASA classification I-III.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Known gastrointestinal disorders contraindicating early oral hydration (e.g., peptic ulcer disease, hiatal hernia, irritable bowel syndrome, esophagitis, or prior gastrointestinal surgery).\n2. Inability to express thirst or communicate (e.g., language barrier, altered consciousness).\n3. Requirement for nasogastric suction.\n4. History of facial, oropharyngeal, or laryngeal surgery.\n5. Swallowing dysfunction or delayed gastric emptying (e.g., gastroparesis).\n6. Incomplete reversal of muscle relaxant at PACU admission (no adequate spontaneous breathing or protective airway reflexes).",{"count":163,"type":22},[25],"This study aims to evaluate whether allowing early oral hydration on demand effectively relieves postoperative thirst and enhances patient satisfaction in individuals undergoing urological endoscopic procedures",[312,28],"Thirst; Due to Deprivation of Water",[314,315,316,317],"Postoperative","Thirst","Oral Hydration","Satisfaction","2026-04-25",{"date":320,"type":34},"2026-05-04",{"date":322,"type":34},"2026-04-18",{"date":324,"type":22},"2026-10-18",{"name":326,"class":41},"Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation",{"id":328,"slug":329,"hasResults":12,"nctId":330,"briefTitle":331,"officialTitle":332,"acronym":333,"eligibilityCriteria":334,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":335,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":337,"conditions":338,"keywords":341,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":348,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":349,"startDateStruct":350,"completionDateStruct":352,"leadSponsor":354,"locationsCount":75},"100636033","patient-satisfaction-following-multidisciplinary-cancer-care-assessment-in-day-hospital-a-prospective-observational-study-100636033","NCT07560423","Patient Satisfaction Following Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Assessment in Day Hospital: A Prospective Observational Study.","Evaluation and Analysis of Patient Satisfaction Following Multidisciplinary Complex Assessment in Day Hospital: Determinants and Implications for Continuous Quality Improvement","EVAQSAP-HDJ-BC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult patients (≥ 18 years old)\n* Patients undergoing a multidisciplinary \"complex assessment\" in a Day Hospital setting\n* Patients diagnosed with cancer and scheduled to receive injectable anticancer treatment\n* Ability to understand and complete the satisfaction questionnaire\n* Patients who have been informed and have not opposed participation\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients under 18 years of age\n* Patients unable to complete the questionnaire (e.g., severe cognitive impairment or major language barrier)\n* Patients who refuse participation\n* Patients with incomplete Day Hospital complex assessment\n* Patients under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship)\n\nPatients under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship)",{"count":336,"type":22},309,"This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction following a multidisciplinary \"complex assessment\" conducted in a Day Hospital setting at the Centre Hospitalier de Martigues. This assessment is part of routine care for patients diagnosed with cancer and scheduled to receive injectable anticancer treatment.\n\nDuring this assessment, patients meet several healthcare professionals, including a pharmacist, dietitian, psychologist, social worker, and supportive care providers. The objective is to identify patient-specific needs and improve coordination of care at an early stage of the treatment pathway.\n\nThis is a prospective observational study based on an anonymous satisfaction questionnaire distributed to eligible adult patients after completion of the Day Hospital assessment. The primary objective is to assess overall patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives include evaluating satisfaction by specialty, identifying factors associated with satisfaction, and assessing the Net Promoter Score (NPS).\n\nThe results of this study are expected to help identify strengths and areas for improvement in multidisciplinary care, enhance patient-centered care, and support continuous quality improvement in oncology practice.",[28,339,340],"Cancer","Quality of Health Care",[342,343,344,345,346,347],"Multidisciplinary Care","Oncology","Supportive Care","Patient Experience","Health Services Research","Net Promoter Score","2026-04-24",{"date":268,"type":34},{"date":351,"type":34},"2025-07-10",{"date":353,"type":22},"2029-04-15",{"name":355,"class":41},"Centre Hospitalier de Martigues",{"id":357,"slug":358,"hasResults":12,"nctId":359,"briefTitle":360,"officialTitle":361,"acronym":362,"eligibilityCriteria":363,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":364,"targetDuration":366,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":367,"conditions":368,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":375,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":376,"startDateStruct":378,"completionDateStruct":380,"leadSponsor":381,"locationsCount":4},"100617607","quality-of-life-and-functional-outcomes-in-laryngeal-cancer-patients-100617607","NCT07320820","Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes in Laryngeal Cancer Patients","Assessment of Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction, Swallowing Function, Voice Outcomes, Pain, and Anxiety-Depression at Baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-Month Follow-Up in Patients Diagnosed With Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Study","QoL in LSSC","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment.\n* Histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.\n* Planned to undergo surgical treatment or radiotherapy\u002Fchemoradiotherapy as part of standard oncological care.\n* Willing and able to participate in the study and to provide written informed consent.\n* No history of psychiatric or neurological disorders that could impair comprehension, questionnaire completion, or study participation.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age \\\u003C 18 years.\n* Presence of comorbid conditions that may independently affect swallowing or voice functions.\n* Patients who withdraw consent or request to discontinue participation during or after the treatment period.\n* History of psychiatric disorders or use of psychiatric medications that may interfere with study participation or completion of patient-reported outcome measures.",{"count":365,"type":22},120,"12 Months","Laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas are head and neck malignancies that directly affect both swallowing and voice functions and are associated with a significant deterioration in patients' quality of life throughout the treatment process.\n\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate quality of life, voice and swallowing functions, pain, anxiety-depression levels, and patient satisfaction at the pre-treatment period and at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months post-treatment in patients with laryngeal malignancies, using validated questionnaires, in order to:\n\nElucidate the course of functional recovery following treatment,\n\nIndividualize rehabilitation and follow-up strategies, and\n\nExamine the relationship between functional outcomes and oncological survival.",[369,370,28,371,372,373,374],"Laryngeal Carcinoma","Quality of Life (QOL)","Voice Quality","Swallowing Function","Pain Management","Anxiety Depression","2026-04-21",{"date":377,"type":34},"2026-04-22",{"date":379,"type":22},"2026-04-02",{"date":99,"type":22},{"name":382,"class":41},"Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi",{"id":384,"slug":385,"hasResults":12,"nctId":386,"briefTitle":387,"officialTitle":388,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":389,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":390,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":391,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":392,"briefSummary":393,"conditions":394,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":397,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":398,"startDateStruct":400,"completionDateStruct":402,"leadSponsor":404,"locationsCount":406},"100591023","educational-discharge-video-impact-on-post-operative-healthcare-utilization-after-holep-100591023","NCT06975033","Educational Discharge Video Impact on Post-Operative Healthcare Utilization After HoLEP","The Impact of Discharge Educational Discharge Videos on Post-Operative Care Utilization After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Procedures","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Adults aged 18+\n2. Patients scheduled for a HoLEP procedure\n3. Patients willing to complete both baseline and follow up surveys\n4. Patients able to provide informed consent\n5. Patients are English-speaking and understand English\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients under 18+\n2. Patients unable to consent\n3. Patients unable to complete surveys\n4. Patients without a prostate.\n5. Patients are non-English speakers","MALE",{"count":226,"type":22},[25],"This will be a randomized interventional study. Patients scheduled to undergo a HoLEP at UCSF will be randomized into two groups after the procedure: one group will watch a scripted educational HoLEP video and the other group will not receive a video. We will monitor the post-operative care utilization after discharge. Secondary outcomes will include patient satisfaction.",[395,28,396],"HoLEP","Educational Video Intervention","2026-04-13",{"date":399,"type":34},"2026-04-16",{"date":401,"type":34},"2025-11-04",{"date":403,"type":22},"2026-12-01",{"name":405,"class":41},"University of California, San Francisco",3,{"id":408,"slug":409,"hasResults":12,"nctId":410,"briefTitle":411,"officialTitle":412,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":413,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":414,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":416,"briefSummary":417,"conditions":418,"keywords":422,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":426,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":427,"startDateStruct":428,"completionDateStruct":430,"leadSponsor":432,"locationsCount":75},"100632764","chewing-gum-and-cold-gargle-on-post-bronchoscopy-symptoms-100632764","NCT07517926","Chewing Gum and Cold Gargle on Post-Bronchoscopy Symptoms","The Effect of Chewing Gum and Gargling With Cold Water on Post-Bronchoscopy Sore Throat, Dysphagia, and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Being 18 years of age or older\n\n  * Having a scheduled diagnostic bronchoscopy\n  * Having normal speech and swallowing functions\n  * Being conscious and able to communicate\n  * Volunteering to participate in the study\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* • Complications during bronchoscopy\n\n  * Gastroesophageal reflux\n  * Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs\n  * Receiving steroid treatment within 1 week prior to the procedure\n  * Active infection or disease in the mouth or throat area\n  * History of allergy or intolerance to the procedure\n  * Previous anatomical or functional impediment to chewing gum or gargling",{"count":415,"type":22},100,[25],"This study aims to evaluate the effects of chewing gum and gargling with cold water on common post-bronchoscopy symptoms, such as sore throat and difficulty swallowing (dysphagia). Bronchoscopy is a procedure that can cause temporary throat discomfort. In this randomized controlled trial, patients will be divided into groups to receive either chewing gum, cold water gargle, or standard care. The researchers will then measure and compare patient satisfaction levels and the severity of throat symptoms to determine if these simple interventions can improve patient comfort after the procedure.",[419,420,28,421],"Sore Throat","Dysphagia","Bronchoscopy",[421,419,420,423,424,425],"Chewing Gum","Cold Water Gargle","Nursing Care","2026-04-07",{"date":397,"type":34},{"date":429,"type":34},"2025-11-10",{"date":431,"type":22},"2026-05-11",{"name":433,"class":41},"Ankara University",{"id":435,"slug":436,"hasResults":12,"nctId":437,"briefTitle":438,"officialTitle":439,"acronym":440,"eligibilityCriteria":441,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":442,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":444,"briefSummary":445,"conditions":446,"keywords":451,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":455,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":456,"startDateStruct":458,"completionDateStruct":460,"leadSponsor":462,"locationsCount":75},"100631362","traction-pressure-and-rapid-muscle-release-tpr-technique-during-intramuscular-injection-effects-on-pain-and-patient-satisfaction-100631362","NCT07499687","Traction, Pressure, and Rapid Muscle Release (TPR) Technique During Intramuscular Injection: Effects on Pain and Patient Satisfaction","The Effect of the Traction, Pressure, and Rapid Muscle Release (TPR) Technique on Pain and PatientSatisfaction During Intramuscular Injection: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study","TPRTDIMI","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Voluntary participation in the study\n* Ability to speak and understand Turkish\n* Being between 18 and 65 years of age\n* Having a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 30\n* No sensory impairment in the ventrogluteal muscles\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Presence of a scar, burn, redness, hematoma, bruising, tenderness, or induration at the injection site\n* History of intramuscular injection in the ventrogluteal region within the last 15 days\n* Presence of injection-related fear\n* Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus\n* History of neuropathy\n* Presence of any hearing, visual, or speech impairment\n* Presence of a mental disability\n* Use of oral or parenteral analgesic medication before the procedure.",{"count":443,"type":22},102,[25],"This study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of the Traction, Pressure, and Rapid Muscle Release (TPR) technique, an innovative method used during intramuscular vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) injections, on patients' pain and satisfaction levels compared with the conventional injection method.",[447,448,449,28,450],"Injection Techniques","Nursing Interventions","Injection Pain Prevention","Intramuscular Injection",[452,453,264,454],"intramuscular injection","tpr technique","satisfaction","2026-03-24",{"date":457,"type":34},"2026-03-30",{"date":459,"type":22},"2026-04-06",{"date":461,"type":22},"2026-10",{"name":463,"class":41},"Bezmialem Vakif University",{"id":465,"slug":466,"hasResults":12,"nctId":467,"briefTitle":468,"officialTitle":469,"acronym":470,"eligibilityCriteria":471,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":84,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":472,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":474,"briefSummary":475,"conditions":476,"keywords":486,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":489,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":490,"startDateStruct":491,"completionDateStruct":493,"leadSponsor":495,"locationsCount":497},"100510689","evaluating-novel-healthcare-approaches-to-nurturing-and-caring-for-hospitalized-elders-100510689","NCT05929703","Evaluating Novel Healthcare Approaches to Nurturing and Caring for Hospitalized Elders","Evaluating Novel Healthcare Approaches to Nurturing and Caring for Hospitalized Elders (ENHANCE)","ENHANCE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Provision of informed consent\n* At least 70 years of age\n* Anticipated length of hospital stay at least 72 hours\n* Family member or care partner available to be on-site in the hospital\n* At least one delirium risk factor (e.g., cognitive or functional impairment, dehydration, vision or hearing impairment)\n* Evaluable cognitive function at baseline (i.e., ability to complete baseline cognitive function assessment)\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Delirium on admission\n* Unable to communicate verbally (e.g., coma, mechanical ventilation)\n* Unable to participate fully in interventions (e.g., terminal condition, advanced dementia)\n* Staff safety concerns (e.g., violent behavior)\n* Cardiac or intracranial surgery (due to competing causes of delirium)",{"count":473,"type":22},1900,[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) with a family-augmented version of HELP (FAM-HELP), that includes family members and care partners, for the prevention of delirium in older patients during hospital admission. The main objectives of the trial are the following:\n\n1. To compare the effectiveness of FAM-HELP and HELP in reducing both the incidence of delirium and its severity.\n2. To compare the effectiveness of FAM-HELP and HELP in improving patient- and family-reported outcomes.\n3. To explore the implementation context, process, and outcomes of the FAM-HELP program in diverse hospital settings.",[477,478,479,480,481,482,483,484,485,28],"Delirium","Neurocognitive Disorders","Mild Cognitive Impairment","Alzheimer Disease","Aging","Family Support","Family Members","Caregiver Burden","Implementation Science",[477,487,488,485],"Clinical Trial","Comparative Effectiveness Research","2026-03-20",{"date":455,"type":34},{"date":492,"type":34},"2023-12-04",{"date":494,"type":22},"2027-08",{"name":496,"class":41},"University of Michigan",7,{"id":499,"slug":500,"hasResults":12,"nctId":501,"briefTitle":502,"officialTitle":503,"acronym":504,"eligibilityCriteria":505,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":506,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":508,"conditions":509,"keywords":513,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":516,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":517,"startDateStruct":519,"completionDateStruct":521,"leadSponsor":523,"locationsCount":75},"100629200","patient-satisfaction-study-at-aou-maggiore-della-carit-score-100629200","NCT07471581","Patient Satisfaction Study at AOU Maggiore Della Carità (SCORE)","Patient Satisfaction With Care: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study at AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Novara (SCORE)","SCORE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Adult inpatients (age ≥ 18 years) admitted to ordinary wards of AOU Maggiore della Carità.\n* Hospitalization for at least 48 hours at the time of questionnaire administration.\n* Able to provide informed consent.\n* Able to understand and speak Italian.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Hospitalization shorter than 48 hours.\n* Age \\\u003C 18 years.\n* Cognitive impairment or clinical conditions preventing comprehension or autonomous completion of the questionnaire.\n* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.",{"count":507,"type":22},250,"The general aim of this study is to assess and analyze the level of patient satisfaction with nursing care among inpatients in the ordinary wards of the AOU Maggiore della Carità in Novara (Italy). Using the validated Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales (NSNS), the study intends to produce reliable and comparable data that reflect patients' perceived quality of care across multiple dimensions, including relationships, emotional support, information, and time devoted by nurses. The study aims to provide an updated overview of patient experiences, identifying strengths and areas for improvement. These results will offer guidance for organizational and educational strategies to promote more personalized, human-centered nursing care aligned with international quality and safety recommendations, without altering routine clinical practice.",[28,510,425,511,512],"Nursing","Patient-Centered Care","Cross-Sectional Studies",[28,510,425,511,514,515,345],"Cross-Sectional Study","Healthcare Quality","2026-03-10",{"date":518,"type":34},"2026-03-13",{"date":520,"type":22},"2026-04-09",{"date":522,"type":22},"2026-05-31",{"name":524,"class":41},"Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro",{"id":526,"slug":527,"hasResults":12,"nctId":528,"briefTitle":529,"officialTitle":530,"acronym":531,"eligibilityCriteria":532,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":533,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":535,"briefSummary":536,"conditions":537,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":542,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":543,"startDateStruct":545,"completionDateStruct":547,"leadSponsor":549,"locationsCount":75},"100628625","advanced-brain-imaging-tka-fmri-tka-100628625","NCT07464080","Advanced Brain Imaging-TKA (fMRI-TKA)","Brain Network-based Precision Medicine to Predict Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty","fMRI-TKA","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Male and female patients aged 18 years or older\n2. Primary TKA\n3. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or osteonecrosis\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Inability or refusal to sign informed consent form\n2. Non-English or French speaking, and no licensed translator, family member or substitute decision maker available\n3. History of major neurological disorders (e.g traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis\n4. Cognitive impairment or dementia\n5. Revision and\u002For Bilateral TKA\n6. Chronic Opioid use",{"count":534,"type":22},50,[25],"Knee replacement surgery is a common and effective treatment for pain and mobility loss, yet up to 1 in 5 patients remain dissatisfied after surgery due to ongoing pain or difficulty with daily activities. Currently, clinicians cannot reliably predict which patients will experience these challenges.\n\nThis study uses MRI scan of the brain to investigate whether specific patterns of brain activity can predict patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). By comparing brain networks before surgery and afterward, and linking these changes to patient-reported pain and function, we aim to identify brain-based markers that can help predict outcomes, to improve satisfaction after knee replacement surgery.",[538,539,540,28,541],"Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)","Knee Pain Chronic","Brain Network Connectivity","Brain MRI","2026-03-09",{"date":544,"type":34},"2026-03-11",{"date":546,"type":22},"2026-04-01",{"date":548,"type":22},"2028-12-31",{"name":550,"class":41},"Ottawa Hospital Research Institute",{"id":552,"slug":553,"hasResults":12,"nctId":554,"briefTitle":555,"officialTitle":556,"acronym":557,"eligibilityCriteria":558,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":18,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":559,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":561,"briefSummary":562,"conditions":563,"keywords":566,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":574,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":575,"startDateStruct":577,"completionDateStruct":579,"leadSponsor":581,"locationsCount":4},"100624576","peripheral-venous-access-management-by-radiologic-technologists-in-radiodiagnostic-procedure-100624576","NCT07411430","Peripheral Venous Access Management by Radiologic Technologists in Radiodiagnostic Procedure","Peripheral Venous Access Management by Radiologic Technologists in Radiodiagnostic Procedures: Training, Organization, and Patient Safety. Evaluation of a Structured Training Program and Its Clinical and Organizational Effects","TSRM_01","Inclusion Criteria for Radiologic Technologists (RTs):\n\n* Voluntary participation and provision of written informed consent.\n* Completion of the structured theoretical and practical training program for peripheral venous access placement for contrast media administration.\n\nInclusion Criteria for Patients:\n\n* Age ≥18 years\n* Provision of written informed consent.\n* Undergoing a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination requiring peripheral venous access placement for contrast media administration.\n\nExclusion Criteria for Radiologic Technologists (RTs):\n\n\\- No written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria for Patients:\n\n* Age \\\u003C18 years.\n* Severe cognitive impairment that precludes valid informed consent or completion of the patient survey.\n* No written informed consent.\n* Clinical conditions that make peripheral venous access placement complex or unsafe, as determined by the clinical team.",{"count":560,"type":22},9,[25],"The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the impact of a structured training program on the ability of Radiologic Technologists (RTs) to safely and effectively perform peripheral venous access (PVA) placement for contrast media administration in a radiodiagnostic setting.\n\nThe study focuses on adult patients undergoing contrast-enhanced imaging procedures and on Radiologic Technologists who have completed a competency-based theoretical and practical training program on peripheral venous access management.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does a structured training program improve the theoretical knowledge and technical competencies of Radiologic Technologists in peripheral venous access placement?\n* What is the incidence of complications associated with peripheral venous access placement performed by trained Radiologic Technologists in routine clinical practice?\n* How do patients perceive the procedure in terms of pain, safety, procedural success, and overall satisfaction?\n\nParticipants:\n\n* Radiologic Technologists will participate in a structured theoretical and practical training program focused on peripheral venous access placement for contrast media administration.\n* Radiologic Technologists will perform peripheral venous access placement during routine radiodiagnostic procedures following completion of the training.\n* Patients undergoing contrast-enhanced imaging will receive peripheral venous access placement performed by trained Radiologic Technologists and will complete questionnaires assessing pain, satisfaction, and perceived safety of the procedure.",[564,565,28],"Skill Development of Staff","Clinical Practice",[567,568,569,570,571,572,573],"skills","venipunture","education program","RT's","Radiation Technologists","Nurse","interdisciplinarity","2026-02-11",{"date":576,"type":34},"2026-02-13",{"date":578,"type":22},"2026-02-15",{"date":580,"type":22},"2026-08-15",{"name":582,"class":41},"Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS",{"id":584,"slug":585,"hasResults":12,"nctId":586,"briefTitle":587,"officialTitle":588,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":589,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":590,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":591,"briefSummary":593,"conditions":594,"keywords":598,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":602,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":603,"startDateStruct":605,"completionDateStruct":607,"leadSponsor":608,"locationsCount":75},"100622648","phase-4-intrathecal-versus-epidural-morphine-for-post-cesarean-analgesia-100622648","NCT07386353","Intrathecal Versus Epidural Morphine for Post-Cesarean Analgesia","Intrathecal Versus Epidural Morphine for Post-Cesarean Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section;\n* Age \\> 18 years;\n* Willingness to participate in the study, as demonstrated by signed informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification \\> III;\n* Chronic kidney disease with a glomerular filtration rate \\\u003C 60 mL\u002Fmin;\n* Relevant drug allergies (particularly to protocol medications);\n* Opioid tolerance;\n* Contraindication to neuraxial anesthetic techniques.",{"count":365,"type":22},[592],"PHASE4","Cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, making effective management of acute postoperative pain a key issue in obstetric anesthesiology. Post-cesarean analgesia should promote rapid maternal recovery, support newborn care, and consider the pharmacological implications for breastfeeding.\n\nAccording to recent PROSPECT® guidelines from ESRA, neuraxial opioids play a central role in post-cesarean analgesia and are at least as effective as other techniques, such as continuous local anesthetic infusion. However, the optimal route of opioid administration remains unclear. While earlier studies favored epidural morphine, more recent evidence suggests that intrathecal morphine may provide superior analgesia. Due to limited and conflicting data, no definitive conclusion can be drawn. Given that epidural morphine remains standard practice at Hospital Central do Funchal, a randomized clinical trial is proposed to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal versus epidural morphine after elective cesarean section.",[595,92,596,28,597],"Analgesia Obstetrical","Post Operative Pain","Cesarean Section Pain",[599,600,601],"Post-Cesarean Analgesia","Epidural Morphine","Intrathecal Morphine","2026-01-27",{"date":604,"type":34},"2026-02-04",{"date":606,"type":34},"2024-05-20",{"date":121,"type":22},{"name":609,"class":41},"Hospital Central do Funchal",{"id":611,"slug":612,"hasResults":12,"nctId":613,"briefTitle":614,"officialTitle":614,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":615,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":616,"enrollmentInfo":617,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":619,"briefSummary":620,"conditions":621,"keywords":622,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":623,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":624,"startDateStruct":626,"completionDateStruct":628,"leadSponsor":630,"locationsCount":4},"100617833","effects-of-music-application-and-gum-chewing-on-pain-anxiety-and-patient-satisfaction-during-episiotomy-repair-100617833","NCT07323758","Effects of Music Application and Gum Chewing on Pain, Anxiety, and Patient Satisfaction During Episiotomy Repair","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Study participation criteria\n\n  * Women aged 18-49,\n  * Primiparous,\n  * Having a medio-lateral episiotomy,\n  * Having a singleton pregnancy,\n  * Vertex presentation,\n  * Having given birth vaginally,\n  * Having an episiotomy length of 4-5 cm,\n  * Having an uncomplicated newborn,\n  * Volunteering to participate in the study,\n  * Being able to speak and understand Turkish.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Women who experienced deep lacerations (anal sphincter injuries, 3rd and 4th degree lacerations) during labor,\n* Those who underwent operative delivery (with vacuum or forceps),\n* Those with visual, hearing, or sensory impairments,\n* Those who were not diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder but had problems,\n* Those diagnosed with a high-risk pregnancy,\n* Those who had any signs of infection, such as vaginal redness or swelling,\n* Those who developed complications during any stage of labor,\n* Women with chronic illnesses (diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and hypertension) will not be included in the study.","49 Years",{"count":618,"type":22},60,[25],"Lacerations and episiotomies are serious procedures requiring surgical stitches. Therefore, pain occurs during episiotomy repair. Pain during episiotomy repair also causes anxiety, which in turn exacerbates pain. The goal of pain management is to alleviate pain without experiencing side effects. Midwives and nurses responsible for labor management play an active role in the use of nonpharmacological interventions to manage pain and anxiety during episiotomy repair.\n\nNo studies in the literature have been found that combine music and chewing gum during episiotomy repair. This study aims to determine the effects of music and chewing gum during episiotomy repair on pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction.\n\nThis study will be to determine the effects of music and chewing gum during episiotomy repair on pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction.",[56,91,28],[264,236,28],"2026-01-06",{"date":625,"type":34},"2026-01-07",{"date":627,"type":22},"2026-01",{"date":629,"type":22},"2026-05-28",{"name":631,"class":41},"Suleyman Demirel University",{"id":633,"slug":634,"hasResults":12,"nctId":635,"briefTitle":636,"officialTitle":637,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":638,"healthyVolunteers":110,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":224,"enrollmentInfo":639,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":641,"briefSummary":642,"conditions":643,"keywords":644,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":649,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":650,"startDateStruct":651,"completionDateStruct":653,"leadSponsor":655,"locationsCount":75},"100616893","ultrasound-guided-rsctl-vs-eoip-block-for-analgesia-in-sleeve-gastrectomy-100616893","NCT07311525","Ultrasound-Guided RSCTL vs EOIP Block for Analgesia in Sleeve Gastrectomy","Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Retro Superior Costotransverse Ligament Space Block Versus External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients aged between 18 to 65 years\n* Both genders\n* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II\n* Body mass index (BMI) \\> 40 kg m-2,\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Obesity secondary to an endocrine disorder\n* known allergic diathesis to any drugs used in the study\n* Presence of serious systemic illness (e.g., severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic dysfunction),\n* Coagulation dysfunction\n* Pre-existing psychological disorders\n* Current use of analgesic or psychotropic medications\n* Infection at a potential injection site\n* Ahistory of chronic pain\n* Conversion to laparotomy.",{"count":640,"type":22},90,[25],"The aim of this study is to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided retro-SCTL space block and EOI block on opioid consumption within 24 hours after LSG.",[28],[645,646,647,648],"Sleeve Gastrectomy","Postoperative Analgesia","External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block","Retro superior costotransverse ligament space block","2026-01-01",{"date":623,"type":34},{"date":652,"type":22},"2026-02-01",{"date":654,"type":22},"2027-02-01",{"name":656,"class":41},"Beni-Suef University",{"id":658,"slug":659,"hasResults":12,"nctId":660,"briefTitle":661,"officialTitle":661,"acronym":662,"eligibilityCriteria":663,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":664,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":164,"phases":4,"briefSummary":665,"conditions":666,"keywords":674,"overallStatus":30,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":677,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":678,"startDateStruct":680,"completionDateStruct":682,"leadSponsor":684,"locationsCount":406},"100617117","procedural-sedation-and-analgesia-for-treatment-of-adults-with-fractures-and-dislocations-in-the-emergency-department-100617117","NCT07314450","Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Treatment of Adults With Fractures and Dislocations in the Emergency Department","PAINEX","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Age ≥18.\n2. Patients with the following injuries are eligible:\n\n   1. Reduction treatment of shoulder dislocation\n   2. Reduction treatment of elbow dislocation\n   3. Reduction treatment of distal radius fractures, application of cast\n   4. Reduction treatment of finger fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   5. Casting treatment of upper extremity fractures\n\n      * Proximal humerus fracture, application of fixed sling\n      * Humeral shaft fracture, application of Sarmiento brace\n      * Supracondylar fracture, application of angled cast\n   6. Reduction treatment of hip dislocation\n   7. Reduction treatment of patella dislocation\n   8. Reduction of tibial shaft fracture, application of cast\n   9. Reduction treatment of ankle fractures including distal tibia fracture\n   10. Reduction treatment for toe fractures\u002Fdislocation\n   11. Casting treatment of lower extremity fractures\n\n       * Distal femur fracture, application of cast\u002Ftraction\n       * Proximal tibia fracture, application of cast or hinged brace\n       * Ankle fracture, application of walker\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Unable to give informed consent (e.g. unconscious, psychotic or dementia)\n2. Unwilling to participate in the study\n3. Prior inclusion in the study\n4. Already included in another clinical study at the same day\u002Fhospital visit\n5. Pregnant or breastfeeding",{"count":163,"type":22},"The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different procedural sedation and analgesia methods used for adults with painful fractures requiring reduction treatment in the emergency department.\n\nThe main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Which sedation and analgesia methods provide the best patient satisfaction and pain relief?\n* How do different treatment methods affect clinician satisfaction and the occurrence of adverse events?\n\nThe investigators will compare different types of procedural sedative and analgesic treatments (such as systemic sedation\u002Fanalgesia and regional techniques like nerve or hematoma blocks) to see which approach offers the best patient satisfaction and most effective pain control.\n\nParticipants will:\n\nBe adult patients with upper or lower extremity fractures or joint dislocations requiring painful reduction procedures.\n\nReceive one of the routinely used sedation or analgesia treatments (or no analgesia) during their emergency department care.\n\nReport their pain levels and satisfaction before, during, and after treatment. Be monitored for any side effects, complications, or use of antidotes. Data will be collected over a six-month period at Odense University Hospital, Holbæk Hospital, and Zealand University Hospital, Køge, following the STROBE guidelines for observational studies.",[667,92,668,28,669,317,670,671,672,673],"Pain, Procedural","Extremity Injury","Satisfaction, Personal","Upper Extremity Injury","Lower Extremity Fracture","Upper Extremity Fracture","Extremity Injuries Lower",[675,676],"Emergency Department","Procedural sedation and analgesia","2025-12-17",{"date":679,"type":34},"2026-01-02",{"date":681,"type":34},"2025-07-29",{"date":683,"type":22},"2026-07-01",{"name":685,"class":41},"Region Zealand",{"id":687,"slug":688,"hasResults":12,"nctId":689,"briefTitle":690,"officialTitle":691,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":692,"healthyVolunteers":12,"sex":50,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":693,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":694,"briefSummary":695,"conditions":696,"keywords":698,"overallStatus":65,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":706,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":707,"startDateStruct":709,"completionDateStruct":711,"leadSponsor":713,"locationsCount":188},"100616915","pain-management-for-in-office-gynecologic-procedures-using-a-risk-stratification-pain-calculator-100616915","NCT07311824","Pain Management for In-Office Gynecologic Procedures Using a Risk-Stratification Pain Calculator","Pain Management Optimization for In-Office Gynecologic Procedures: The Development and Evaluation of a Risk-Stratification Pain Calculator","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* At least 18 years of age\n* Proficient in English\n* Access to personal smart devices (smartphone, tablet, laptop, etc.)\n* Will be undergoing the following in-office gynecologic procedures: IUD insertion, endometrial biopsy, colposcopy with cervical biopsy, or hysteroscopy\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Under the age of 18\n* Non-English-Speaking\n* Have contraindications to taking NSAIDs, acetaminophen, lidocaine or its derivatives, or opioids\n* Patients who are taking methadone, Suboxone, and\u002For naltrexone",{"count":163,"type":22},[25],"The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how using a risk-stratification calculator to determine the risk of a patient experiencing severe pain during an in-office gynecologic procedure and subsequently assigning pain medications to be used for the procedure based on risk, will affect patients' pain during these procedures. The main questions it aims to answer are:\n\n* Does using pain medications determined by a risk-stratification calculator improve patients' pain scores during if-office gynecologic procedures?\n* Does using pain medications determined by a risk-stratification calculator improve patient satisfaction?\n\nResearchers will compare using the risk-stratification calculator to decide on pain medications to a provider using their best judgement to decide on pain medications. This will help determine if patients have improved pain scores and satisfaction if they have their pain medications assigned using the risk-stratification calculator.\n\nParticipants who are undergoing a relevant in-office gynecologic procedure will:\n\n* Receive pain medications for their procedure either based on their answers to questions for the risk-stratification calculator or based on their provider's best judgement.\n* Answer an online survey about their experience with the procedure and related pain management.",[373,28,697],"Gynecologic Procedures",[699,235,700,701,702,703,704,705],"pain management","gynecologic procedures","IUD insertion","hysteroscopy","endometrial biopsy","colposcopy","ambulatory gynecologic procedures","2025-12-16",{"date":708,"type":34},"2025-12-31",{"date":710,"type":22},"2025-12-29",{"date":712,"type":22},"2027-04-30",{"name":714,"class":41},"Carle Foundation Hospital"]