[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"prolapse-pelvic\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:prolapse-pelvic":27},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,3,0,[8,41,72],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":29,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":30,"startDateStruct":33,"completionDateStruct":35,"leadSponsor":37,"locationsCount":40},"100405527","prophylactic-laparoscopic-suspension-after-mccall-100405527",false,"NCT04560543","Prophylactic Laparoscopic Suspension After McCall","Prophylactic Laparoscopic Suspension After McCall - Benefit and Longterm Outcome","LAPCALL","Inclusion criteria\n\n* LSC simple hysterectomy,\n* Neg. SS test if premenopausal\n* \\>18j,\n* Consent to participate in the study\n* Understanding of the German language\n\nExclusion criteria\n\n* Prolapse as indication for surgery\n* Known or suspected non-compliance\n* Additional incontinence procedures\n* Patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis\n* Irradiation pre- or postoperative\n* Pregnancy and lactation.\n* Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy\n* Inability to understand the study protocol","FEMALE","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},114,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","There is prove of prolapse prevention in vaginal hysterectomy using the McCall suture. Poor and especially no long-term data exists for a standardized laparoscopic approach, but the few studies could show good anatomic results.\n\nThe aim is to test the effectiveness of the laparoscopic McCall suture compared to usual vaginal cuff closure in a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.",[27],"Prolapse Pelvic","RECRUITING","2026-05-17",{"date":31,"type":32},"2026-05-19","ACTUAL",{"date":34,"type":32},"2021-05-15",{"date":36,"type":21},"2032-12-31",{"name":38,"class":39},"Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern","OTHER",1,{"id":42,"slug":43,"hasResults":11,"nctId":44,"briefTitle":45,"officialTitle":45,"acronym":46,"eligibilityCriteria":47,"healthyVolunteers":48,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":49,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":51,"briefSummary":52,"conditions":53,"keywords":55,"overallStatus":62,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":63,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":64,"startDateStruct":66,"completionDateStruct":68,"leadSponsor":70,"locationsCount":40},"100624763","vaginal-natural-orifice-transluminal-endoscopic-vnote-hysterectomy-with-uterosacral-suspension-100624763","NCT07413861","Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic (vNOTE) Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Suspension","VENUS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Age\\>18\n* All women undergoing vNOTES hysterectomy ± Bilateral salpingectomy\u002Fsalpingo-oopherectomy for benign gynecological indication\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Exclusion for vNOTES surgery: pelvic inflammatory disease, previous rectal surgery, suspected malignancy, radiation\n* Indication for surgery: elvic prolapse\n* Other surgical interventions planned for the procedure",true,{"count":50,"type":21},50,[24],"As the adoption of Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) expands, attention is shifting from feasibility studies to the refinement of surgical steps that optimize long-term pelvic health.\n\nOne technical distinction between vNOTES hysterectomy and conventional laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is the routine early transection of the uterosacral ligaments as the approach is caudal-cephalic. These ligaments are not merely anatomic landmarks-they are the primary apical support structures of the vagina, anchoring the vaginal cuff to the sacrum and providing resistance against downward displacement. Disruption of this support can predispose patients to apical vaginal prolapse, a condition that significantly affects quality of life and may require complex reconstructive surgery.\n\nUterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is a well-established, effective method of restoring apical support at the time of hysterectomy. Incorporating uterosacral suspension into vNOTES hysterectomy is a logical evolution toward ensuring that minimally invasive innovation does not come at the expense of long-term pelvic health. By adapting and standardizing this reconstructive step for vNOTES, surgeons can maintain apical support, reduce future prolapse risk, and uphold the same quality benchmarks established in laparoscopic and vaginal surgery.\n\nOBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS:\n\nThis study aims to present a practical, reproducible technique for performing USLS in the vNOTES setting and to evaluate its potential immediate benefits, possible complication rates, and additional operative time compared with vNOTES hysterectomy without USLS. In doing so, we seek to demonstrate that preventive pelvic support can be seamlessly integrated without compromising the efficiency or advantages of the transvaginal endoscopic approach.",[27,54],"Hysterectomy",[56,57,58,59,60,61],"hysterectomy","prevention","pelvic prolapse","uterosacral suspension","vaginal surgery","vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-02-12",{"date":65,"type":32},"2026-02-17",{"date":67,"type":21},"2026-03-01",{"date":69,"type":21},"2027-12-01",{"name":71,"class":39},"The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston",{"id":73,"slug":74,"hasResults":11,"nctId":75,"briefTitle":76,"officialTitle":77,"acronym":78,"eligibilityCriteria":79,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":80,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":81,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":83,"briefSummary":84,"conditions":85,"keywords":96,"overallStatus":28,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":102,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":103,"startDateStruct":105,"completionDateStruct":107,"leadSponsor":109,"locationsCount":40},"100549201","biological-ovitex-versus-synthetic-graft-in-robotic-prolapse-surgery-100549201","NCT06430931","Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery","Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery: a Multicentre, Phase 11-111, Partially Randomised Patient Preference Trial","ProTex","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Indication for VMR or SCR set by the treating surgeon\u002Fgynecologist in accordance to the current guidelines on rectal and pelvic prolapse;\n* Counselled for therapeutic options and given informed consent for VMR or SCR;\n* Counselled for different types of mesh (OviTex or Prolene) and randomisation;\n* Written informed consent for randomisation, OviTex implant or Prolene;\n* Written informed consent for observational data collection.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Mentally incompetent patients (unable to fulfil questionnaires).\n* Allergy to ovine rumen.\n* A medical history of pelvic radiation therapy.\n* Scheduled for a redo-rectopexy.\n* A medical history of previously implanted pelvic floor meshes or native tissue.\n* Language barrier","ALL",{"count":82,"type":21},184,[24],"This prospective study aims to assess the efficacy of the OviTex 1S permanent mesh in pelvic floor surgery in comparison with the current standard polypropylene mesh.",[86,87,88,89,27,90,91,92,93,94,95],"Colorectal Disorders","Prolapse","Prolapse Rectal","Prolapse Genital","Rectocele","Prolapse Uterus","Cystocele","Enterocele","Prolapse Bladder","Prolapse; Cervix",[87,97,98,99,100,101],"Abdominal prolapse Surgery","Biological mesh","OviTex","VMR","sacrocolporectopexy","2025-12-31",{"date":104,"type":32},"2026-01-02",{"date":106,"type":32},"2023-12-06",{"date":108,"type":21},"2027-07-01",{"name":110,"class":39},"Meander Medical Center"]