[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"spine-osteoarthritis\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:spine-osteoarthritis":35},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,55],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":36,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":43,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":44,"startDateStruct":47,"completionDateStruct":49,"leadSponsor":51,"locationsCount":54},"100651571","phase-4-success-rates-and-safety-of-steroid-injections-in-managing-spinal-and-sacro-iliac-pain-cortisone-injection-spine-study-100651571",false,"NCT07762170","Success Rates and Safety of Steroid Injections in Managing Spinal and Sacro-Iliac Pain (CORTisone Injection Spine Study)","Success Rates and Safety in Managing Spinal and Sacro-Iliac Pain: A Critical Analysis","CORTISS","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\>18 years of age;\n* Diagnosis of lumbar, cervical, or thoracic pain with various etiologies;\n* Eligibility to receive steroid injections for back pain, including epidural, facet joints, or SIJ injections, or other injections (e.g., local anesthetics);\n* Being willing and able to provide NRS pain ratings and PROMIS functionality ratings before the intervention, and the same scores plus IPR, fIPR, and PGIC at various follow-up points after the intervention;\n* Provide written informed consent.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson's disease or other cognitive impairments;\n* Congenital or acquired polyneuropathy;\n* Back surgery in the month before injection treatment or planned surgery in the subsequent 3 months;\n* Any clinically significant acute or chronic medical condition that in the judgment of Investigator may preclude injection in the epidural space or compromise patient safety, limit patient's ability to complete the study, and\u002For compromise the objectives of the study;\n* Participation in any other competing clinical study within 3 months prior to screening and during the study period.","ALL","18 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},500,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"PHASE4","This study aims to analyze the efficacy and safety of different kinds of steroid injections for back pain, comparing different steroids, dosages, locations (epidural, facet joints, nerve blocks), and also the difference between injections with steroids and local anesthetics, to optimize this treatment that is currently not standardized. The investigators will compare retrospectively and prospectively the efficacy of different injections in the same patients, using mainly a parameter called integral of pain relief, which combines the percentage of pain relief provided by a treatment and its duration over time, as well as improvements in functionality.",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35],"Back Pain Lower Back","Neck Pain","Radiculopathy Multiple Sites","Spinal Stenosis Cervicothoracic Region","Spinal Stenosis Lumbar","Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)","Sciatica","Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy, Lumbar Region","Spine Osteoarthritis",[37,38,39,40,41],"epidural steroid injections","back pain treatments","pain relief","spinal steroid injections","spinal injections","RECRUITING","2026-08-07",{"date":45,"type":46},"2026-08-13","ACTUAL",{"date":48,"type":46},"2026-07-30",{"date":50,"type":21},"2030-03",{"name":52,"class":53},"Igor Wilderman. MD","OTHER",1,{"id":56,"slug":57,"hasResults":11,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":60,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":61,"healthyVolunteers":11,"sex":17,"minAge":18,"maxAge":62,"enrollmentInfo":63,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":65,"briefSummary":67,"conditions":68,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":42,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":80,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":81,"startDateStruct":83,"completionDateStruct":85,"leadSponsor":87,"locationsCount":54},"100562489","clinical-evaluation-and-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-3d-digital-surgery-in-traumatology-100562489","NCT06603831","Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology","Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n\\- Patients that requires one of the following surgical procedures \u002F interventions: Radius osteotomy due to non-articular metaphyseal malunion Complex acetabular arthroplasty Thoracic-lumbar spine arthrodesis.\n\n-Patients that can understand the clinical study and that are able to read, understand and sign the consent form\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients that are not able to read, understand or sign the consent form.\n* Patients that can't or have no support to complete the clinical trial.\n* Patients with complex deformities or complications that would require mandatory personalized digital surgery treatment","80 Years",{"count":64,"type":21},180,[66],"NA","Digital surgery, in combination with patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is being used more and more in traumatology due to its proven benefits and applications. Nowadays, medical case planning and an optimal preparation before surgery are still a challenge for surgeons. This lack of preparation is translated into longer surgical procedures, potential complications, unnecessary sterilization of materials and a high number of fluoroscopies. 2D techniques such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT) and X-rays remain essential for medical planning, however, in many cases, a 3D visualization is needed to achieve better results, especially in complex cases.The use of personalized medical instruments such as surgical guides has proven to increase clinical accuracy, assuring a better correction of bone deformities, and allowing a more precise location of implants and screw positioning. Furthermore, the use of 3D-printed patient-specific prosthesis can lead to better clinical outcomes as they reduce the number of complications as well as they present a longer lifespan compared to conventional generic implants.Despite the potential of 3D technology in the medical field, there is still a lack of robust studies that compares clinical benefits between digital surgery and conventional 2D surgery, and its economic impact is still unknown. Thus, the investigators propose this randomized, prospective and multi-center clinical study to evaluate the use of 3D technology in traumatology. The aim of this project is to prove that digital surgery is a cost-effective methodology and therefore it should be adopted by the public health system as a gold standard procedure.",[69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,35,79],"Radius; Deformity","Hip Osteoarthritis","Hip Arthritis","Hip Arthropathy","Spine Injury","Radius; Anomaly","Vertebra; Degeneration","Vertebral Fracture","Hip Prosthesis Infection","Spinal Fusion","Spinal Deformity","2024-11-08",{"date":82,"type":46},"2024-11-12",{"date":84,"type":46},"2024-10-21",{"date":86,"type":21},"2027-12-31",{"name":88,"class":53},"Corporacion Parc Tauli"]