[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"ultra-processed-labels\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:ultra-processed-labels":28},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":10,"hasResults":11,"nctId":12,"briefTitle":13,"officialTitle":14,"acronym":15,"eligibilityCriteria":16,"healthyVolunteers":17,"sex":18,"minAge":19,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":20,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":23,"phases":24,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":4,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":30,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":31,"startDateStruct":34,"completionDateStruct":36,"leadSponsor":38,"locationsCount":5},"100659385","testing-ultra-processed-warning-labels-and-not-ultra-processed-labels-in-united-states-100659385",false,"NCT07863570","Testing Ultra-processed Warning Labels and Not-Ultra-processed Labels in United States","Testing Adding Ultra-processed Warning Labels and Not-Ultra-Processed Labels in the FDA Nutrition Info Box, a Randomized Online Experiment in Adults in the United States","UPF-LABELS-NIB","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* 18 years of age or older\n* Residing in the United States\n* Member of the CloudResearch Panel\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* \\\u003C18 years of age\n* Not residing in the United States",true,"ALL","18 Years",{"count":21,"type":22},12400,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[25],"NA","This randomized controlled online experiment will test whether adding an ultra-processed food (UPF) warning label or a positive not-ultra-processed (Not-UPF) label, to the FDA's proposed Nutrition Information Box (NIB) changes consumer perceptions of UPFs among U.S. adults.\n\nParticipants will be randomized to one of four label conditions and will evaluate UPF and Not-UPF products with different nutritional profiles of 3 food categories: yogurts, cereals, and sliced breads. The primary outcome is shelf choice and the secondary outcomes are correct identification of UPF products, perceived healthfulness, perceived usefulness, and perceived message effectiveness.\n\nThis experiment aims to answer the following questions:\n\nDo UPF warning labels and Not-UPF labels shift shelf choice toward Not-UPF products compared to the NIB alone? Is a UPF warning label more effective than a Not-UPF label at shifting shelf choice, decreasing perceived healthfulness, improving correct identification of UPFs, and increasing perceived usefulness and perceived message effectiveness?\n\nResearchers will compare outcomes across the four randomized arms to estimate the independent effect of adding a UPF warning label versus a Not-UPF label beyond nutrient disclosure in the NIB alone.",[28],"Ultra-Processed Labels","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2026-10-06",{"date":32,"type":33},"2026-10-08","ACTUAL",{"date":35,"type":22},"2026-10",{"date":37,"type":22},"2026-11-11",{"name":39,"class":40},"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","OTHER"]