4K Versus 3D Total Laparoscopic Bilateral Oophorectomy: Tools in Comparison

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorAzienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine

About this trial

Evaluate whether the 4K laparoscopic vision system can provide an advantage in performing bilateral oophorectomy procedures for benign conditions carried out by trainee surgeons compared to 3D laparoscopy

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with benign ovarian pathology requiring bilateral oophorectomy

ASA score <3

Patients who have signed the appropriate informed consent

Patients who are not pregnant or diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease

Disqualifiers

Suspected neoplastic pathology

Patients not eligible for surgery

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    3D laparoscopy versus 4K laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by residents

Treatment groups

22 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: 3D laparoscopyActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: 4K laparoscopyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

operative time

To compare the operative time of bilateral oophorectomy performed using 3D laparoscopy versus 4K laparoscopy for benign indications, conducted by trainee surgeons.

Time frame
from enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: