Clinical trials

This is a non-comparative randomized Phase 2 study using the INITIUM regimen with or without elective nodal irradiation (ENI) delivered before surgery for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) followed by nab-paclitaxel combined with toripalimab in patients with previously untreated HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer. Eligible patients include those with stage IIB-IIIC disease (cT3N0, cT2-4N1-3 or cT1N2-3) or stage IIA disease (cT2N0 or cT1N1) with at least two of the following high-risk factors: histologic grade 3, Ki-67 ≥50% or premenopausal with age \<50 years. A total of 27 enrolled patients will be assigned to receive the combination therapy. The primary question it aims to answer is whether this combination of radiotherapy, de-escalated chemotherapy, and immunotherapy can improve the total pathologic complete response (tpCR) rate (defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0).

This study is being done to answer the following question: Are there types of early-stage vulvar cancer that require either less or more treatment than the usual approach?

This multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgery combined with postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus finotonlimab plus induction chemotherapy followed by postoperative finotonlimab maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN).

Primary Objectives： Evaluate the complete response rate (CR rate) and safety of short - course radiotherapy combined with ivonesimab (AK112) in patients with pMMR/MSS mid - low rectal cancer. Secondary Objectives： Evaluate treatment - related toxic reactions, the quality of life, long - term prognosis (local control \[LC\], disease - free survival \[DFS\] and overall survival \[OS\]). Patients will : Receive Radiotherapy: Pelvic IMRT or VMAT, DT 25Gy/5Fx. One week after radiotherapy, begin treatment with Ivorsimab (AK112) at a dose of 20mg/kg by intravenous drip on day 1. One cycle is 21 days, and a total of 6 cycles are to be carried out. Evaluate the curative effect after 3 cycles of treatment. Patients with progressive disease (PD) will withdraw from the study, and other treatment plans will be adjusted in a timely manner. Patients with CR/PR/SD will continue treatment for another 3 cycles. Conduct a comprehensive assessment after 6 cycles of treatment. Patients who achieve cCR can choose the watch - and - wait approach. For patients who do not achieve cCR, TME surgery is recommended. Decide whether to perform adjuvant chemotherapy based on the postoperative pathological findings.

Exploring the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab on advanced stage III-IV endometrial cancer

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, two-arm phase 2 trial that will evaluate whether the use of Pulsed Low-Dose-Rate radiation technique, as compared to standard radiation, is associated with reduced rates of clinically significant esophagitis during and following chemoradiation.

This is a prospective, open-label, single-center, single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of multimodal ablation in combination with perioperative tislelizumab and chemotherapy in patients with pathologically confirmed resectable stage II-IIIB (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer. Oropharynx SCC (OPSCC) is a common sub-type of HNSCC. Each year, 16,000 new cases of OPSCC are diagnosed in the USA. Most cases of OPSCC (\>90%) are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) and are often cured with current therapy. However, patients treated with surgery followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (POA(C)RT) still experience substantial morbidity. In this highly curable disease, current clinical research interest is focused on investigation of de-escalated therapy, with the goal to reduce treatment-related adverse events (AEs) while maintaining a low recurrence rate. In this study, patients with HPV-related OPSCC will undergo resection of the primary tumor site and involved/at-risk regional neck nodes. Based on the pathology report, patients will be assigned to: * Arm 1 (de-POACRT-42 Gy) * Arm 2A (de-POART-42 Gy) * Arm 2B (de-POART-37.8 Gy) * Arm 2C (de-POACRT-30 Gy). All patients with high-risk pathology will be assigned to Arm 1 whereas patients with intermediate-risk pathology will be randomized (1:1:1) to Arm 2A, Arm 2B, or Arm 2C. Patients with highest-risk pathology and low-risk pathology will be removed from the trial after surgery and will be advised to pursue standard of care options.

The aims of the Observational Approach versus Surgical Intervention for Asymptomatic Stone (OASIS) trial are: 1) to determine whether observation compared to upfront surgery results in less healthcare-related life disruption due to kidney stones among children and adults with asymptomatic kidney stones; 2) to identify the groups benefiting the most from each strategy; and 3) to determine the preferences and values informing the choice between observation and upfront surgery.

The prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who develop post-operative early tumor recurrence is often relatively poor. Therefore, biomarker that can detect micro metastases before the start of treatment is required. Epigenomic alterations such as DNA methylation have attracted attention as promising biomarkers. The investigators aim to predict early recurrence based on whole genome DNA methylation analysis of esophageal cancer.

This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study evaluates APG-157 in adults with newly diagnosed locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Two independently powered cohorts are enrolled based on treatment pathway. Cohort A evaluates APG-157 administered as neoadjuvant therapy before curative-intent surgery in participants with resectable oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer who are medically ineligible for perioperative pembrolizumab. Cohort B evaluates APG-157 administered as induction therapy before definitive chemoradiotherapy and as maintenance therapy after chemoradiotherapy in participants with unresectable or medically inoperable disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 within each cohort to receive APG-157-based treatment or standard-of-care therapy. The primary hypothesis is that APG-157 given before definitive surgery followed by (chemo)radiotherapy improves event-free survival (EFS) compared to surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy alone (Cohort A), and that APG-157 given as induction therapy prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by maintenance APG-157 improves EFS compared to definitive CRT alone (Cohort B).

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks among the leading malignant gastrointestinal tumors globally in terms of both incidence and mortality. Cases of EC in China account for over 50% of the global total, with squamous cell carcinoma being the primary pathological type. Locally advanced EC (LAEC), particularly cases where radical surgical resection is not feasible, exhibits high recurrence rates and low 5-year survival rates. However, studies have shown that patients with LAEC who undergo comprehensive treatment followed by surgery experience significantly prolonged survival and improved quality of life compared to those who do not receive surgical intervention. Current conversion treatment regimens under investigation include: chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, and immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy-each of these approaches has distinct advantages and limitations. Immunochemotherapy has emerged as a current research focus: it not only demonstrates significantly superior efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone but also exhibits lower cumulative toxicity than radiotherapy-combined conversion regimens, resulting in a more favorable overall benefit-risk ratio. As such, it represents the most promising conversion treatment strategy. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies have shown that low-dose radiotherapy targeting the small intestine can enhance the anti-tumor response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced solid tumor, prolong their overall survival, and increase the incidence of the abscopal effect. Further mechanistic investigations have revealed that intestinal low-dose radiotherapy (ILDR) may augment the immune cancerous lethality by modulating the gut microbiota and their metabolic profiles. Based on the findings from these preliminary studies, the current research plans to conduct a prospective phase II single-arm clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of ILDR combined with immunochemotherapy as conversion therapy in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BR/UR ESCC). This research plans to enroll at least 39 evaluable cases or a total of 43 cases in two seperated stages, focusing on patients with thoracic BR/UR ESCC. Patients will receive a single fraction of ILDR with a mean dose of 1 Gy, concurrently with 3 cycles of albumin-bound paclitaxel (260 mg/m² on day 1), cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1), and tislelizumab (200 mg on day 1). The efficacy and safety of the treatment will be evaluated throughout the study.

This observational study follows patients with T4 stage sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (a rare cancer of the nasal cavity/sinuses) who receive standard treatment: surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. The main goal is to measure the 3-year progression-free survival rate (the percentage of patients alive without cancer growth or spread). We will also assess overall survival, recurrence, side effects, and quality of life. This multicenter, prospective study will provide much-needed real-world data to improve patient counseling and guide future research.

This study is a single-arm prospective clinical trial. The primary objective of the study is to explore the efficacy and safety of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy with Tislelizumab combined with Anlotinib and Nab-Paclitaxel in resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.Finally, it provides new evidence-based medical evidence for the perioperative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

One third of individuals aged \>60 years will be diagnosed with at least one renal cyst following abdominal imaging. These cystic lesions are categorized according to the Bosniak classification which categorizes cysts according to their degree of complexity and risk of malignancy. Growing evidence suggests that a significant proportion of Bosniak III and IV cysts are benign and that the malignant ones present low metastatic potential. Since renal surgery carries substantial morbidity (20%) and potential mortality (0.5%), active surveillance has gained attention as a potential tradeoff to surgery to overcome overtreatment. Therefore, prospective studies of long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the oncologic safety of this strategy for patients with Bosniak III/IV cysts. This is an multicenter prospective observational longitudinal study. The main objective is to compare the 5-year follow-up cancer-specific survival between the active surveillance and the surgical groups.

This is a multi-center, Phase II clinical study aiming to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and organ preservation feasibility of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus surgery in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who achieve clinical complete response/partial response (cCR/PR) after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. A total of 120 eligible subjects will be enrolled. Patients with cCR/PR after 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy will be grouped based on personal willing: the control group (n=60) will receive radical esophagectomy + mediastinal lymph node dissection; the experimental group (n=60) will receive definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy: 50.4 Gy/28f; chemotherapy: nab-paclitaxel 175mg/m² + carboplatin AUC=5, q21d for 2 cycles). All the patients will receive camrelizumab maintenance therapy (200mg q21d) up to 1 year.

Soft tissue sarcoma is a rare cancer that often requires surgery combined with radiotherapy. Preoperative radiotherapy can improve the chance of complete tumor removal and limb preservation, but some patients still experience local recurrence, distant metastasis, or poor tumor response. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II study for patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or trunk who need preoperative radiotherapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive preoperative radiotherapy plus anlotinib, or preoperative radiotherapy plus anlotinib and penpulimab. Surgery will be performed after completion of neoadjuvant treatment according to the study protocol. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether adding penpulimab to preoperative radiotherapy and anlotinib can improve 3-year disease-free survival. The study will also assess pathological response, wound complications, treatment-related adverse events, local control, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, limb function, quality of life, and exploratory biomarkers related to treatment response.

This is a multicenter, randomized, open label phase lll trial to assess whether preoperative chemotherapy, as an adjunct to curative-intent surgery, improves the prognosis of high risk DDLPS (dedifferentiated Liposarcoma) and LMS (Leiomyosarcoma) patients as measured by disease free survival. After confirmation of eligibility criteria, patients will be randomized to either the standard arm or experimental arm.

Research the genetic and biomechanical markers of human adipose tissue on patients with morbid obesity. Additional tissue/fluid collection is also gathered during the time of surgery.

This clinical trial tests how well entrectinib works to treat patients less than 3 years of age with NTRK 1/2/3 or ROS1 fused, high grade glioma or other central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) due to leaflet prolapse is frequent and can be surgically repaired in the vast majority of patients. Despite the efficacy of mitral valve repair, an ongoing international controversy exists regarding the need to perform early surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe MR and no sign of LV dysfunction in whom the probability of successful and durable repair is very high. In this group of patients, differing views of the risks of uncorrected severe MR exist: considered as benign by those supporting medical "watchful waiting" or associated with significant excess mortality/morbidity by those advocating early surgery. This controversy can only be resolved by a randomized controlled trial which is still lacking. The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of early mitral valve repair in patients with asymptomatic severe MR due to leaflet prolapse compared to an initial conservative management in terms of all-cause death and cardiovascular morbidity during five years follow-up.

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized phase 2 study of adebrelimab plus full-course neoadjuvant therapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant treatment will be randomized 1:1 to watchful waiting with 2 cycles consolidation chemo-Immunotherapy or standard surgery. Primary endpoint is 2-year DFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, pCR/MPR, R0 resection rate, safety, and quality of life.

This study hypothesizes that approximately 50% of rectal cancer patients can preserve their rectum using a watch-and-wait strategy if they achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). The objective is to determine whether the complications, quality of life, and survival rates of rectal cancer patients who have achieved a complete or near-complete clinical response to TNT, followed by a watch-and-wait approach, are comparable to those of patients who undergo surgery first. Additionally, the study aims to identify potential prognostic and predictive markers for rectal cancer and examine survival rates and factors influencing responses to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or TNT. The study is divided into two parts: \*\*Part One:\*\* Participants with cT1N1, T2-T3 N0-1 rectal cancer, MRF-, and EMVI-, with surgery as one of the possible first-line treatment options, will be randomized into two groups. The experimental group will consist of participants receiving TNT, including CRT and consolidation chemotherapy (Ch). If these participants achieve a complete or near-complete clinical response, they will be observed using a watch-and-wait strategy, which is a non-operative approach. The control group will consist of participants who undergo surgical treatment initially. \*\*Part Two:\*\* All participants with rectal cancer who have received CRT or TNT will be included. Additionally, participants diagnosed with rectal cancer who are scheduled for CRT or TNT but declined to participate in Part One or do not meet the inclusion criteria will also be included.

Purpose of the Study: This clinical study investigates whether a shorter or longer duration of systemic therapy before local treatment (surgery or radiation) results in better disease control in patients with esophageal or gastric cancer with a limited number of metastases, also known as oligometastases. Background: In about 25% of patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer, the disease spreads to only a few sites (oligometastatic disease). Prior studies suggest that local treatment after systemic therapy may extend survival in this subgroup. However, it is unclear how long systemic therapy should last before initiating local treatment. The OMEC-5 study aims to clarify this and identify potential biomarkers for treatment response. Study Design: Initiated by Amsterdam UMC and UMCU and conducted in multiple hospitals across Europe. Total of 414 patients to be enrolled. Duration: \~53 months (35 months enrollment + 18 months follow-up). Approved by the medical ethics committee at Amsterdam UMC. Procedure: Eligibility screening: Includes physical exam, blood tests (incl. circulating tumor cells), medical history review, and confirmation of oligometastases by an expert panel. Initial treatment: All participants receive 4 months of standard systemic therapy (chemotherapy + immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy depending on tumor markers like HER2 or Claudin 18.2). Response assessment (Review 1): Imaging and/or laparoscopic examination. If oligometastases persist and tumors have not progressed, participants are randomized into two groups: Group A (longer systemic therapy): 4 more months of systemic therapy, then local treatment if disease is stable, followed by 4 months of immunotherapy ± targeted therapy. Group B (shorter systemic therapy): Immediate local treatment followed by 4 months of systemic therapy, then reassessment and potentially 4 months of immunotherapy ± targeted therapy. Follow-up: Regular scans and quality-of-life questionnaires (5 times), and periodic blood sampling (4 times). Treatments Involved: Chemotherapy: CapOx or FOLFOX Immunotherapy: nivolumab or pembrolizumab Targeted therapy: trastuzumab (HER2-positive) or zolbetuximab (Claudin 18.2-positive) Potential Benefits and Risks: Patients may benefit from better disease control and a personalized treatment strategy. Known side effects relate to the standard treatments used (chemo, immuno, targeted therapies), and no extra medical risk is expected beyond routine care. Possible inconveniences include blood draws, scans, minor surgery (laparoscopy), and time investment. Data and Sample Handling: Personal data and tumor/blood samples are coded and securely stored. Data may be used for future cancer research if the patient consents. Participants can withdraw at any time. Confidentiality and Privacy: Patient data are kept confidential, and participants have rights to access or delete their data. Privacy measures comply with GDPR and Dutch law. Compensation and Insurance: Participation is voluntary, with no financial compensation. Standard treatment costs are covered by healthcare insurance. No extra insurance is required, as the treatment aligns with standard care practices.