About this trial
This prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority interventional study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous pulsed field ablation (PFA) guided by ultrasound alone versus fluoroscopy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The success rate of complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins during the procedure was compared to verify that ultrasound-only guidance is non-inferior to fluoroscopic guidance.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult patients aged 18 to 75 years (including 18 years and 75 years of age).
Patients diagnosed with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation via 12-lead electrocardiography or ambulatory electrocardiography and scheduled to undergo pulsed field ablation.
Subjects are able to understand the purpose of the study, voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent, and are willing to complete the follow-up according to the requirements of the program.
Disqualifiers
Atrial fibrillation secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disorders, or reversible non-cardiac causes;
Previous history of catheter ablation or cardiac surgery for atrial fibrillation;
Prior surgical history including patent foramen ovale closure, atrial septal defect closure or repair;
Implantation of left atrial appendage occluder, mechanical mitral valve prosthesis, or valvuloplasty ring containing metallic materials;
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Percutaneous pulsed field ablation is performed under ultrasound-only guidance in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Procedure/SurgeryPercutaneous pulsed field ablation is performed under ultrasound-only guidance in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent percutaneous pulsed field ablation under fluoroscopic guidance.
Procedure/SurgeryPatients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent percutaneous pulsed field ablation under fluoroscopic guidance.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Success rate of complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins during the procedure
The proportion of all pulmonary veins maintaining bidirectional block across ablation lines at 20 minutes after ablation completion.
Secondary outcomes
The incidence of complications within 30 days after the procedure
Observe the proportion of complications occurring within 30 days after the procedure. Such complications include pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade requiring drainage, phrenic nerve palsy lasting more than 24 hours, severe vascular complications requiring intervention, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula, and death.
Success rate of atrial fibrillation ablation at 12 months post-procedure.
Defined as the absence of AF, atrial flutter (AFL), or atrial tachycardia (AT) episodes ≥30 seconds on dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring after the blanking period (90 days post-catheter ablation)
The proportion of patients admitted to hospital or emergency departments due to atrial fibrillation recurrence within 12 months after the procedure.
The proportion of patients admitted to hospital or emergency departments due to atrial fibrillation recurrence within 12 months after the procedure.
The proportion of patients who received electrical cardioversion due to atrial fibrillation recurrence within 12 months after the procedure
The proportion of patients who received electrical cardioversion due to atrial fibrillation recurrence within 12 months after the procedure.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Lead sponsor
Hangzhou Dinova EP Technology Co., Ltd
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: