A Comparison of People's Responses to the Labels "Natural Immunity" Versus "Disease-induced Immunity".

ConditionAttitudes
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorLaval University

About this trial

A comparison of how people respond to the terms "natural immunity" versus "disease-induced immunity".

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Able to use a computer

Able to use the internet

Able to read and respond to questions in English or French

18+ years old and living in Canada

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • disease-induced immunity

    Other intervention

    Using a different label for natural immunity, specifically, "disease-induced immunity"

  • natural immunity

    Other intervention

    Using standard label "natural immunity"

Treatment groups

350 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: natural immunityPlacebo comparator 1 intervention
Group B: disease-induced immunityExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Opinion about forms of immunity

Participants indicate their opinion in response to question, "In your opinion, which is better: vaccine-induced immunity or natural/disease-induced immunity?" on a visual analog scale (slider) from 0-100, with 0 = "vaccine-induced immunity is much better," 50 = "both forms of immunity are equally good," 100 = "natural/disease-induced immunity is much better."

Time frame
Immediately after intervention

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: