A Comparison of Video Versus Written Instructions for Early Motion Flexors Rehabilitation

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Puerto Rico

About this trial

The research objective is to evaluate the efficacy of video instructions compared to written or verbal instructions for early motion rehabilitation following hand flexor repair. The primary research question addresses whether video instructions improve compliance with early motion rehabilitation post-surgery compared to traditional methods. The hypothesis is that patients who receive video instructions are more likely to adhere to their rehabilitation regimen than those who receive verbal or written instructions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Video Instrctions

    Other intervention

    Video instructions of rehabilitation techniques and movements to help with adherence and compliance to treatment.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Video Instructions GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Written Instructions GroupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Functional outcomes

Range of motion (i.e., using a goniometer)

Time frame
The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.
2

Patient-reported outcomes

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Measuring distance from 1-100 millimeters. Higher scores indicate pain, whilst lower scores indicate less or no pain.

Time frame
The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.
3

Compliance with Rehabilitation Protocol

Frequency of the early motion exercises (i.e., track how often the patients perform their rehabilitation exercises)

Time frame
The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.
4

Functional Outcome

Grip strength (i.e., using a dynamometer)

Time frame
The measurement is assessed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

Secondary outcomes

1

Clinical outcomes

Complication rates: track the incidence of adhesions, re-ruptures, and infections.

Time frame
3 months after surgery
2

Rehabilitation efficiency

Number of follow-up visits: compare the number of follow-up visits required for each group.

Time frame
3 months after surgery
3

Cognitive outcome

Instruction comprehension: assess the understanding of the instructions through a quiz or verbal feedback.

Time frame
3 months after surgery
4

Clinical Outcomes

Time to return to work: measure the time taken for patients to return to their usual activities or work.

Time frame
3 months after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: