A Cryotherapy With Tranexamic Acid Versus Normal Saline in the Treatment of Melasma

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age25-60
SponsorMahidol University

About this trial

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a precision cryotherapy via boosting mode combined with tranexamic acid versus normal saline in the treatment of melasma. Eighteen patients aged 25 to 60 years diagnosed with epidermal-typed melasma sized equal to or more than 2 cm on both cheeks were included. The patients were treated with a precision cryotherapy via boosting mode combined with tranexamic acid and normal saline on each side of cheek for 4 times every 1 week. Then, they were follow up at 1 and 3 months after the last treatment. Subjective assessment of physician and patient improvement were evaluated. Moreover, Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), melanin and erythema index using Mexameter were also recorded.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

The patients diagnosed with epidermal-type melasma sized equal to or more than 2 cm on both sides of cheeks

Fitzpatrick skin type II-IV

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or lactation

Subjects who have been treated with any kind of energy-based device 6 months prior to the inclusion

Subjects who have been treated with topical or oral treatment for melasma 6 months prior to the inclusion

Subjects who allergy to cryotherapy such as cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria, and abnormal cold tolerance

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • TargetCool

    Device

    The patients were treated with TargetCool via boosting mode combined with tranexamic acid and normal saline on each side of cheek for 4 times every 1 week

Treatment groups

18 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: cryotherapy with tranexamic acidActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: cryotherapy with normal salinePlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The change of Melasma Area and Severity Index score

Two blind dermatologists evaluated Melasma Area and Severity Index score on each side of cheek in every visits (0-48; best to worse)

Time frame
Baseline, 1, 2, 3 weeks after the first treatment and 1, 3 months after the last treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Physician improvement score

Using quartile scale (\<0% = worsen; 0% = no change; 1-25% = mild improvement; 26-50% = moderate improvement; 51-75% = marked improvement; 76-100% = complete improvement)

Time frame
1, 2, 3 weeks after the first treatment and 1, 3 months after the last treatment
2

Overall improvement by patients

Using quartile scale (\<0% = worsen; 0% = no change; 1-25% = mild improvement; 26-50% = moderate improvement; 51-75% = marked improvement; 76-100% = complete improvement)

Time frame
1, 2, 3 weeks after the first treatment and 1, 3 months after the last treatment
3

the changes in melanin index

Using Mexameter

Time frame
Baseline, 1, 2, 3 weeks after the first treatment and 1, 3 months after the last treatment
4

the changes in erythema index

Using Mexameter

Time frame
Baseline, 1, 2, 3 weeks after the first treatment and 1, 3 months after the last treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: