A Decision Support Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Screening -Aim 2

Acceptability of the decision support tool

Participant-reported acceptability of the electronic decision support tool, assessed using a validated acceptability measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) and intervention appropriateness measure (IAM). The minimum score for both measures is 4 (all items rated "1 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 20 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree").

Feasibility, Barriers, and Facilitators of Implementing the Decision Support Tool - Recruitment Rate

Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion and number of eligible participants who enroll in the study, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the electronic decision support tool in clinical practice.

Feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of implementing the decision support tool - retention rate

Retention rate, defined as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who complete use of the electronic decision support tool and all study-related assessments, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the tool in clinical practice.

Change in score on 5 question knowledge assessment

Difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores regarding the screening decision. Change in knowledge will be defined as the difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores on a five-item knowledge assessment, calculated as the post-knowledge score minus the pre-knowledge score. Pre- and post-knowledge scores will be calculated by summing correct answers (equal to 1) and incorrect or incomplete responses (equal to 0). The assessment will be administered immediately before and after the clinic visit.

Rate of Decision-Concordant Care

If the participant undergoes the screening test documented during the clinic visit within 3 months of the visit, this will be considered decision-concordant care. The rate of decision concordant care will be equal to the number of participants who underwent decision-concordant care divided by the total number of participants in the study. Medical record/chart review will be used for measurements

Duration of the clinic visit

Duration of the clinic visit will be measured as the duration of the index clinic visit using available clinical or electronic medical record timestamps. This measure will be used to evaluate whether the intervention affects the amount of time required to complete the clinic visit.

Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -1

Patient-reported assessment of the quality of the shared decision-making process, including the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered in the decision. It will be measured using the collaboRATE questionnaire, administered immediately following the clinic visit and using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The SDM-Q-9 measures the extent to which patients perceive that key components of shared decision-making occurred during the clinical encounter. The minimum score for the SDM-Q-9 is 0 (all items rated "0 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 45 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree"). Higher scores indicate a patient perception of better shared decision making. It will be administered immediately following the clinic visit.