A Peer Recovery Coaching Intervention for Hospitalized Alcohol Use Disorder Patients

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorClemson University

About this trial

The project objective is to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of a peer recovery coaching intervention (called RC-Link) in patients hospitalized with medical complications from alcohol use on recovery outcomes guided by the new NIAAA definition of recovery, examine mechanisms of heavy drinking using daily ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and determine the program's cost-effectiveness using an randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. The primary outcomes are frequency of heavy drinking, biopsychosocial functioning, and remission from AUD.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Live within 50 miles of the recruitment and plan to stay in the area for at least 6 months

Current DSM-V criteria for moderate or severe AUD (measured by a score of ≥4 on the DSM-V Checklist)

Hospitalized with a principal, primary, or secondary AUD-related diagnosis

Disqualifiers

Unable to provide informed consent

Patients referred to hospice during hospitalization

Women who are pregnant

Comorbid diagnosis or at-risk for methamphetamine, cocaine, or opioid use disorder as determined by a score of ≥4 on the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Modified Assist v3.0

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Peer recovery coaching (PRC)

    Behavioral

    The RC-Link peer recovery coaching intervention provides participants with an introduction to an RC-Link coach during their hospitalization. The RC-Link coach delivers coaching and support services for a 6-month period using a standardized PRC Checklist. During the baseline visit, the RC-Link coach first develops a personalized recovery plan with the participant that emphasizes multiple pathways to recovery, including different types of mutual aid groups, counseling, and alternative recovery tools. The approach empowers the participant with an actionable recovery plan that can be initiated upon discharge, but the plan can be modified as changes arise. After the initial baseline encounter, the RC-Link coach initiates phone, virtual, and/or in-person contact with the participant a minimum of twice weekly using the PRC Checklist to standardize service delivery.

  • Brief Intervention (SBIRT)

    Behavioral

    The control will receive a brief intervention, usual care (a referral list), contact information for the study team and hospital case management, and a follow-up contact at the end of the study period. The brief intervention entails (a) using motivational interviewing to gauge the individual's perspective of drinking, how it influences their life, and readiness for change; (b) provide information about the risks of hazardous drinking and potential ways to reduce drinking; (c) elicit their feedback; listen to their concerns; offer encouragement; encourage them to establish goals for behavior change; and (d) provide resources for change (e.g., the referral list). The referral list includes contact information for no-cost peer recovery coach through FAVOR that the participant could choose to call via self-referral. Thus, control participants are able to be linked to PRC, but they must initiate the call and initial visit outside the hospital setting.

Treatment groups

750 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Long-term peer recovery coaching interventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: SBIRT InterventionActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Per Month

This outcome will be measured using the Alcohol Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), a calendar-based, self-report survey. The TLFB is the most widely used measure of alcohol use frequency in treatment trials for AUD and has strong reliability and validity in diverse populations.

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months
2

Remission from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) AUD Diagnosis

The DSM-5 checklist for AUD will be used to assess AUD diagnosis. Remission is defined as meeting 0 of the 11 criteria for AUD diagnosis, excluding craving. According to the NIAAA recovery definition, cessation of heavy drinking and AUD remission are classified as the following durations: initial (0-3 months), early (3-12 months), sustained (1-5 years), and stable (\>5 years). Using this definition, primary study endpoints will be 1-month post-baseline (initial recovery; past 1 month symptoms), 3-month post-baseline (early recovery; past 3-month symptoms), 6-month post-baseline (end of intervention period), and 1-year post-baseline (sustained recovery; past 12-month symptoms)

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months
3

Change in Biopsychosocial Functioning

The self-report World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life brief version (WHOQoL-BREF) will measure biopsychosocial functioning. There are subscales for physical functioning, psychological functioning, level of independence, social relationships, environment, and spirituality. Items are scored on a 1 - 5 scale with higher scores reflecting higher levels of that subscale domain. These items are them transformed so that the raw scale score for each domain is converted to a 0-100 scale with higher scores reflecting greater quality of life on that domain.

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months
4

Cost Effectiveness

The intervention cost will be determined by gauging recovery coach salaries and additional medical provider and support staff time required, and applying this cost to each interaction. We will examine the cost of hospital services (hospital charges), including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, psychiatric inpatient stay, medical outpatient costs, and physician professional fee costs.

Time frame
6-months

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Coping

The self-reported Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) Inventory 28-item scale will be used and administered. Items on this scale range from 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I have been doing this a lot). There are two items for 14 coping strategies, such as self-distraction, emotional support, humor, self-blame, and denial. Higher scores reflect a higher degree of engaging in a particular coping strategies.

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months
2

Change in linkage to and engagement in Evidence-Based Practices

Percentage of participants linked and percentage of participants engaged: Participants will indicate the types of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for AUD that they have been engaged in and the number of days they engaged in EBPs in the past month. EBPs for AUD are defined by the NIAAA as FDA-approved pharmacology for AUD (disulfiram, acamprosate \& naltrexone), inpatient/outpatient rehabilitation, therapy/counseling, and mutual aid programs (e.g., 12-step programs, SMART recovery, etc.).

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months
3

Change in linkage to and engagement in Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) resources

Percentage of participants linked and percentage of participants utilizing resources: Participants will be asked if anyone (family/friend, recovery coach, social worker, etc.) helped provide them with housing, employment, education, food security, or transportation assistance in the past month, and if so, what services and who helped them.

Time frame
one-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months
4

Hospital Utilization

Hospital utilization refers to the number of overall and alcohol-specific inpatient admission and emergency visits.

Time frame
6-months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Clemson University

Lead sponsor

Prisma Health-Upstate

Collaborator

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Collaborator