A Program Evaluation of the Brief Family Therapy Program in the York University Psychology Clinic

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-9
SponsorYork University

About this trial

Background. Children are vulnerable to mental health challenges during development. Given that youth are reliant on their parents for support, understanding the child's symptoms within the family context is critical for promoting positive change. This proposal focuses on "systemic therapy", or family-based therapy, which seeks to enhance children's mental health by improving the relationships and communication between family members (1). Most family-based therapies for treating child mental health problems are intense in duration and frequency (2), which is a barrier to access for many families. Shorter-term family therapies or what will be referred to hereafter as brief family-based therapies are effective in treating a variety of child symptoms, while also minimizing participant burden and therapy dropout (3). One type of brief family-based therapy model is the Lausanne Family Play - Brief (LFP-B), a three-session service that utilizes a play-based family observational assessment with video feedback to draw attention to and catalyze change in challenging family interactions. The LFP has been widely researched as a clinical assessment tool and has been implemented as a brief family-based therapy program (4). The current project represents the implementation and evaluation of the program in the York University Psychology Clinic (YUPC), which services children, adults, couples, and families in the Greater Toronto Area (and Ontario, broadly). The current study will be the first to evaluate the implementation, acceptability, and effectiveness of the LFP-B as a clinic service. Objectives. The aim of this project is to evaluate the LFP-B as a brief family-based clinical service offered in the YUPC. The first objective is to explore program acceptability for both clients and therapists. The investigators are interested in whether clients and therapists are satisfied with this clinical service and its processes. The second objective is to assess program effectiveness, specifically whether coparenting, family functioning, and child mental health problems improve across the course of the program and in the months following. Importance. Brief therapies with a systemic lens can increase cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and treatment retention. They also have potential to fill an apparent gap in service needs as up to three-quarters of youth with psychological concerns never receive treatment (5). Thus, brief services can provide more timely access to mental health care in Canada which have potential for reducing wait times, preventing further deterioration in mental health, and avoiding more intensive and expensive higher levels of care (e.g., acute inpatient mental health services; (6)). The LFP-B has potential to be widely used as a brief family-based therapy program with Canadian families to support child and family functioning in a timely and non-intensive manner.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Both primary caregivers are over age 18 years

Families living in Ontario, Canada

Primary caregivers endorses caring for a child between 2 to 9 years old with a mental health challenge (e.g., anxiety, low mood, behavioural challenges) or mild/moderate levels of family distress

Both caregivers and child agree to participate

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Brief Family Therapy Program

    Behavioral

    The Lausanne Family Play - Brief is a video-feedback intervention adapted for families seeking support for a child two to nine years old with a mental health challenge. Feedback focuses on engagement, teamwork, conflict, and child-focused issues.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Brief Family Therapy ProgramExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Referral Sources

Where participants heard about the program (e.g., social media, YUPC, employee, friend)

Time frame
Week 0
2

Participants Enrolled Per month

Number of participants enrolled per month

Time frame
Week 0
3

Service Enrollment Rate

Proportion of participants offered the service versus those who actually sign up

Time frame
Week 0
4

Reasons for Non-Enrollment

Reasons for not joining the service for those who were offered it (e.g., scheduling multiple caregivers, desire for child-focused treatment, cost, time commitment, etc.)

Time frame
Week 0

Secondary outcomes

1

Pre-Post Change in Parenting Stress

Using the Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Berry \& Jones, 1995). Minimum score=18, maximum score=90. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes (i.e., more stress).

Time frame
Pre-post change from week 1 to week 8
2

Pre-Post Change in Child Reported Coparenting Relationship

Using the Child Perspectives on the Coparenting Relationship - Revised (created based on McHale's 1999 Coparenting Scale - Revised). Minimum score=7, maximum score=21. Higher scores correspond to a greater frequency of outcomes.

Time frame
Pre-post change from week 2 to week 8
3

Pre-Post Change in Parent and Child Family Adjustment

Using the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scale (PAFAS; Sanders \& Morawska, 2010). Minimum score=0, maximum score=90. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes (i.e., higher levels of dysfunction).

Time frame
Pre-post change from week 1 to week 8
4

Pre-Post Change in Child Emotional Distress (i.e., Anger, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms)

Using the subscales of the Emotion Distress scale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NIH) Parent Proxy Domains (ages 5-17) or Early Childhood Parent Report (ages 1-5). Ages 5-17 minimum score = 19, maximum score = 120 Ages 1-5 minimum score = 24, maximum score = 120. Higher scores correspond to worse outcomes (i.e., more emotional distress).

Time frame
Pre-post change from week 0 to week 8

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

York University

Lead sponsor

University of Lausanne

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: