A Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of 3D-printed Non-rigid Biomimetic Implant in Cervical and Thoracolumbar Spine

ConditionSpinal Tumor
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-79
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital

About this trial

Vertebral body resection is a wide accepted procedure in tumor resection, deformity correction, and anterior decompression in spondylosis, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligaments, and spondylodiscitis surgery. However, reconstruction of segmental defect is still challenging to spine surgeon, especially in 3-column resection, such as total en bloc spondylectomy in tumor patients. Various graft or prosthesis for reconstruction has been reported, such as structural allograft, Harms mesh cages, expandable cages, and carbon fiber stackable cages. There are no high evidence level study examining the superiority of those different methods.

Recently, 3D printed vertebral body replacement has been reported in different disease entities as well, such as tumor, Kümmell's disease in osteoporosis, and spondylosis. 3D printed implant comes with superiority in production of complex geometries and regularity of the fine surface detailed that promote bone ingrowth. Although, 3D-printed titanium vertebra could achieved bone integration in human, a systemic review showed that the subsidence noted in 31.4% of spine surgery with 3D printed implants. In spine surgery, the fixation construct is sufficiently stiff, interbody motion can be reduced, and loading sharing promotes bone fusion. On the other hand, if the reconstruction is too stiff, stress shielding at fusion site occurs. The concept of dynamic fusion, as opposed to rigid fusion, has been demonstrated by an anterior cervical interbody fusion study in porcine model, demonstrating good bone formation, less postfusion stiffness, and a trend to less subsidence.

Thus, we developed a 3D printed, custom-made, biomimetic prosthesis, with non-rigid structure, which has been tested in biomechanical study and porcine model, showing good bone formation and less stiffness as well. Therefore, we proposed a prospective clinical study to investigate safety, subsidence, and fusion of this prosthesis.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 20 - 79 years;

Patient meet the indication for 1- to 3- level corpectomy, for primary bone tumor at spine, or metastatic tumor at spine.

Deficit confirmed by CT, MRI, and X-ray;

Pathology level located from C3 to L5.

Disqualifiers

Patient does not meet the indication of corpectomy, which is under the surveillance.

More than three vertebrae required corpectomy;

Corpectomy levels above C3 and below L5

T-score less than -2.5

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 3D-printed custom-made non-rigid biomimetic implant

    Device

    We developed a 3D printed, custom-made, biomimetic prosthesis, with non-rigid structure, which has been tested in biomechanical study and porcine model, showing good bone formation and less stiffness as well. Therefore, we proposed a prospective clinical study to investigate safety, subsidence, and fusion of this prosthesis.

Treatment groups

18 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: 3D-printedExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

We will follow up the condition of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

Time frame
Patient were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

1

Degree of change in the subsidence

In a medical sense, subsidence refers to the collapse or settling of bone located immediately next to an implantable device in direction of the loading force. It is uasually recorded in millimeters. It was assessed on radiological examination. Radiological evaluation, including X-ray and computed tomography.

Time frame
Patient were evaluated pre-operatively, immediately after the surgery, and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.
2

The percentage of patients with successful fusion

The fusion rate is the percentage of patients with successful fusion over a specific range of follow up. The outcomes about fusion rate of bone was assessed on radiological examination. Radiological evaluation, including X-ray and computed tomography.

Time frame
Patient were evaluated pre-operatively, immediately after the surgery, and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.
3

Pain score

Pain score was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale. (0 means no pain, while 10 is the most painful situation).

Time frame
Patient were evaluated pre-operatively, immediately after the surgery, and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.
4

Short form-12 mental component score

The minimum value of mental component scale (MCS-12) is 18.7, and the maximum value of MCS-12 is 65.2. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Time frame
Patient were evaluated pre-operatively, immediately after the surgery, and 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: