A Stakeholder-enhanced Intervention to Improve the Decisional Partnership of Chronic Kidney Disease Dyads (IMPART)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

About this trial

Using a highly innovative methodology, the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), the purpose of this study is to pilot test, an optimization trial approach to develop and refine the decision partnering skills of persons with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and their caregivers. Using a 2x2x2 full factorial design, 64 dyads (patients and one identified caregiver) will be randomized to receive one or more lay coach-delivered decision partnering training components, based on Pearlin's Stress-Health Model of Family Caregiving and Rini's Social Support Effectiveness theory. The components include: 1) caregiver coaching on effective decision support (1 vs. 3 sessions); 2) caregiver decision support communication training (1 session vs. none); and 3) patient social support effectiveness psychoeducation (yes vs. no).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients

Age ≥18;

EMR documented diagnosis of stage 4 CKD (2 eGFR 29-15 within 90 days);

Ability to speak and read English and complete baseline questionnaires;

Disqualifiers

Patients

Receiving hospice;

Receiving dialysis;

Medical record documentation of active unmedicated severe mental illness, moderate-severe dementia, suicidal ideation, uncorrected hearing loss, and active substance abuse.

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ImPart - Improving Chronic Kidney Disease Decisional Partnerships

    Behavioral

    ImPart is a decision support intervention developed and refined in partnership with a advisory group of patients with and caregivers of people living with Chronic Kidney Disease. The program is designed to support decision-making throughout the illness experience.

Treatment groups

128 Participants
are divided into 8 treatment groups

8

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Basic social support + communication + patient psychoeducationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Basic social support + communicationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Basic social support + patient psychoeducationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Basic social supportExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group E: Advanced social support + communication+ patient psychoeducationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group F: Advanced social support + communicationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group G: Advanced social support + patient psychoeducationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group H: Advanced social supportExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Acceptability of Intervention Measure

four-item measure of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success; higher score indicate greater acceptability (highest score - 20)

Time frame
12 weeks
2

Intervention Appropriateness Measure

Four-item measure of implementation outcomes that are often considered "leading indicators" of implementation success; higher score indicate greater appropriateness (highest score - 20)

Time frame
12 weeks
3

Feasibility of Intervention

Intervention completion rate (# participants completing assigned components) will be tabulated, ≥75% completion rates for assigned components will be considered evidence of feasibility

Time frame
12 weeks after baseline
4

Feasibility of Data Collection

Intervention assessment completion rate (# participants completing each study assessment) will be tabulated, ≥75% completion rates for study assessments will be considered evidence of feasibility

Time frame
baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks after baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Health-related decision process for patient as measured by the Decision Conflict Scale

16-item measure; perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors contributing to uncertainty (e.g., feeling uninformed, unclear values) and feeling that decisions were informed and values-based - Scores range from 0 \[no decisional conflict\] to 100 \[extremely high decisional conflict\].

Time frame
baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline
2

Health-related decision process for patient as measured by the Social Support Effectiveness- Questionnaire

25 item measure; perceptions of help received in last 3 months with higher scores indicating more effective support - The total possible score is 66 points

Time frame
baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline
3

Patient and Caregiver well-being/distress as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

14 items total, items measure anxiety and depressive symptoms. Higher scores=worse anxiety/depression - Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. A total subscale score of \>8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable symptoms of anxiety or depression.

Time frame
baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline
4

Patient wellbeing/quality of life as measured by the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Scale (KDQOL 36)

36 items measure three components: physical health score, mental health score, and kidney disease health score. Physical health score, mental health score, and kidney disease health score are averaged scores of sub-scales. The range of each score and each sub-scale is 0 - 100, and higher values indicate better QOL status

Time frame
baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator