About this trial
This single-arm study aims to evaluate the Beacon Platform, an advancement in urological surgery. The study will assess its intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this investigation is to establish safety and performance of the Beacon Platform.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Male
Subject has diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms and/or urinary retention due to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction,
Subject is able and willing to comply with all the assessments of the study,
Subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed the informed consent form,
Disqualifiers
Urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, or bladder neck contracture - either current or recurrent,
History of prostate cancer or diagnosed bladder cancer
Prostate cancer should be ruled out before participation to the satisfaction of the investigator if Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is above acceptable thresholds,
History of other diseases causing voiding dysfunction including urinary retention (e.g., diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc.),
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Beacon Platform
DeviceProcedure is performed using the Beacon Platform
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Successful completion of the enucleation phase of HoLEP with the Beacon Platform
Successful completion of the enucleation phase of HoLEP without the need to convert to conventional (non-robot-assisted) HoLEP, or an alternative surgical procedure for treatment of BPH-related LUTS. This excludes the use of other devices for hemostasis or dissecting the enucleated tissue during or after the procedure and cases identified by the urologist that require conversion to a non-HoLEP procedure due to factors unrelated to the device performance.
The rate of successful endoscopic access to and visualization of the predefined anatomical landmarks in the urinary tract in a non-inferior fashion compared to standard rigid diagnostic cystoscopy.
The rate of successful endoscopic access to and visualization of the predefined anatomical landmarks in the urinary tract in a non-inferior fashion compared to standard rigid diagnostic cystoscopy. The key landmarks included: * Verumontanum * External Sphincter * Apical plane (between sphincter \& adenoma) * Lobes of the prostate * Bladder neck * Bilateral ureteric orifices * The lateral, posterior, and anterior bladder walls. Success is defined as the Beacon Platform achieving clear visualization and scope proximity to all landmarks deemed non-inferior to standard non-robotic rigid cystoscopy as judged by the operating surgeon using a Likert scale assessment tool at the time of the procedure. Failure is defined as inability to visualize/access any landmark due to technical factors.
Rate of procedure related adverse events (AEs)
Proportion of subjects with adverse events rated as probably or definitely related to the study procedure (robot-assisted HoLEP or RoLEP) classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade 3a or higher through 30 days post-treatment.
Secondary outcomes
Incidence of bladder perforation or capsular perforation leading to interruption of the procedure or conversion to conventional HoLEP or other alternative procedure
Incidence of ureteric orifice damage leading to stricture, stenting of the ureter, or other sequelae or subsequent intervention
Duration of hospital stay following the procedure
Duration of catheterization following the procedure
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.