A Study on the Consistency Evaluation of Digital PCR Technology for Quantitative Detection of HBV Nucleic Acid

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorBeijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals

About this trial

The research plan aims to evaluate the consistency of the digital PCR-based hepatitis B virus nucleic acid quantification technique with the existing Roche qPCR-based detection method. Approximately 200 samples of residual serum from patients with chronic hepatitis B, covering high, medium, low, and those below the Roche lower limit concentration or undetectable, will be collected. The two methods will be used for parallel testing. The main objective is to evaluate the quantitative consistency of the two methods within the quantifiable range of Roche (≥ 20 IU/mL); the secondary objectives include evaluating the qualitative detection rate of samples with concentrations below 20 IU/mL or undetectable nucleic acid.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients who have been diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B (in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of the "Chronic Hepatitis B Prevention and Treatment Guidelines (2022 Edition)") and are currently receiving NAs antiviral treatment for ≥ 6 months or have not received treatment and are ≥ 18 years old;

Remaining samples (serum) that have undergone combas HBV DNA testing and have clear test results, with the sample collection time frozen for ≤ 6 months;

The remaining sample volume is sufficient (≥ 1.0 mL), sufficient for digital PCR testing and necessary duplicate testing;

Samples from the same patient at different time points can be included as independent samples, but the sampling interval time needs to be recorded.

Disqualifiers

Combine other liver virus infections such as HCV, HDV or HIV;

Poor sample quality, such as severe hemolysis, lipemia or repeated freezing and thawing ≥ 3 times;

The samples were not properly frozen and stored (-80℃) after collection or the temperature records were missing;

The clinical information is severely lacking, making it impossible to confirm the diagnosis and treatment status;

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • the results were classified according to concentration levels

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 5 treatment groups