A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fecal Transplant and Dietary Changes on Disease Activity in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Active Crohn Disease

ConditionCrohn Disease
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences

About this trial

Dysbiosis can be rectified by several methods: antibiotics, prebiotics, probiotics, dietary modulation, and fecal microbiota transplantation. There has been limited success with the isolated use of antibiotics and pre/probiotics in the treatment of IBD. Among the measures of dietary manipulation, the use of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has shown superior, or at least equivalent, efficacy compared with steroids in pediatric CD. Although the results in adults are not as encouraging, recent cohort studies in patients with complicated CD have shown good success rates. Definite exclusion diets that exclude pro-inflammatory dietary constituents have also been tested with good clinical efficacy in patients with CD, who even failed treatment with anti-TNF agents. Various dietary approaches, inclusive of exclusive enteral nutrition, partial enteral nutrition, and Crohn's disease exclusion diet have been reported to be of benefit and are associated with changes in gut microbiome. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) defined as the infusion of fecal suspension from a healthy individual into the gastrointestinal tract of an individual with GI disease carries a diverse population of microbiota and their metabolites and has been tested with varying efficacy in IBD. In general, FMT has shown good success rates in randomized control trials in patients with UC who failed conventional agents. Although limited small RCTs exist in CD, cohort studies have also shown good success rates. Therefore, the use of FMT in addition to standard medical therapy, is a concept that has not been previously explored and forms the basis for the present study. Therefore, a well-powered RCT is required to resolve the role of FMT in CD. In this study, patients will be recruited in four arms. Group A includes FMT+CDED+SMT, in Group B FMT+SMT+SHAM DIET, in Group C Sham FMT+CDED+SMT, in Group D Sham FMT+ Sham Diet+ SMT given. 168 patients will be recruited across 6 centers for around 3 years. Follow-up of the patient will be done at 0,2,6 and 10 weeks and 8 weekly up to 48 weeks.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with treatment-naive Crohns disease accessible with ileocolonoscopy

Symptom onset of less than 12 months

Mild to moderate disease activity with endoscopically active disease

CDAI of greater than 150 and less than 450

Disqualifiers

Patients with severe disease (CDAI greater than 450, SES-CD greater than 16) or requiring hospitalization

Patients who have been received on corticosteroids, immunosuppressants (azathioprine/ 6- mercaptoprine/methotrexate) for greater than 2 weeks

Biologicals or small molecule exposure

Stricturing (non-passable stricture), fistulising phenotype or perianal fistula/abscess

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Fecal Microbial Transplantation

    Other intervention

    This will involve colonoscopic instillation of fecal transplant

  • Sham transplantation

    Other intervention

    Sham FMT will involve saline infusion via colonoscopy

  • Crohns disease exclusion diet

    Other intervention

    The modified diet plan will be given to each study participant

  • Sham diet

    Other intervention

    Dietary counselling alone

Treatment groups

168 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation(FMT) with Crohns disease exclusion diet(CDED)Experimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Fecal microbiota transplantation(FMT) and sham dietExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Crohns Disease Exclusion Diet(CDED) and sham transplantationExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group D: Sham transplantation with Sham dietSham comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of patients with clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 10

Proportion of patients with clinical remission (defined as CDAI less than 150) and endoscopic response( defined decline in SES-CD by gretaer than 50%).

Time frame
10 weeks
2

Proportion of patients with clinical remission and endoscopic remission at week 48

Proportion of patients with clinical remission (defined as Crohn's disease activity index less than 150) and endoscopic remission (defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease patients less than 3)

Time frame
48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of patients with clinical response at Week 10

Proportion of patients with clinical response is defined as either CDAI decrease from baseline of at least 70 points or CDAI less than 150

Time frame
10 weeks
2

Proportion of patients with PRO2 Remission at Week 10

Proportion of patients with PRO2 Remission which is defined as Abdominal pain subscore of not more than 1 (on a scale of 0-3) and liquid or very soft stool (Bristol stool scale type 6 or 7) frequency subscore of not more than 3 calculated as a mean of 7 day count

Time frame
10 weeks
3

Proportion of patients with endoscopic response at Week 10

Proportion of patients with endoscopic response which is defined as 50% reduction from baseline on SES-CD

Time frame
10 weeks
4

Fecal microbiome and metabolite signature between responders and non-responders at week 10

It involves combined analysis of the microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc.) and the small molecules (metabolites) present in a person's stool sample

Time frame
10 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Lead sponsor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Collaborator

Dayanand Medical College and Hospital

Collaborator

Institute of Medical Sciences of the Banaras Hindu University, India

Collaborator

Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Hospital

Collaborator

Lisie Hospital

Collaborator

Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi

Collaborator

Indian Council of Medical Research

Collaborator