Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Ultrasound Surveillance for Liver Cancer dETection in People at High Risk of Developing Liver Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Oxford

About this trial

Aim: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans without contrast to help improve diagnosis of liver cancer in people who are at increased risk of developing liver cancer.

Background: People with any condition that affects the liver over a long period of time can develop cirrhosis. Conditions and risk factors that can lead to cirrhosis include alcohol excess, liver steatosis (lipid or fat accumulation in the liver) and infection with the viruses hepatitis B and C. One of the concerns about people with cirrhosis is that they are at increased risk of developing liver cancer. People with cirrhosis are recommended to have an ultrasound scan (USS) every 6 months (surveillance for liver cancer) so that if a cancer develops, it is diagnosed at an early stage when it can be cured. However, ultrasound can miss cancers even in people having scans every 6 months. Furthermore, the risk of cancer is not alike among people with cirrhosis. For example, people with more advanced cirrhosis and those with cirrhosis from hepatitis B are at higher risk. It is therefore possible that better tests than ultrasound are needed for people with cirrhosis who are at particularly high risk of developing cancer.

Computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans with dye injection (contrast) are used for liver cancer diagnosis. However, they cannot be done every 6 months because of costs, capacity and toxicity from high CT radiation doses, and MRI contrast build-up in the brain with repeated MRI contrast injections. MRI scans without contrast are not toxic, could be done in 20 minutes and are cheaper, so could be done every 6 months. In the experience of the study investigators, MRI without contrast may raise suspicion of liver cancer in cases missed by ultrasound, so it could be used for surveillance instead of ultrasound. This study aims to find out if it is feasible to use a quick MRI (20 minutes) without contrast as surveillance for liver cancer in people at high risk of liver cancer due to liver cirrhosis and to compare this MRI with ultrasound.

Design and Methods: The investigators will recruit 300 people at higher risk of developing liver cancer because of cirrhosis. Study participants will have an ultrasound scan every 6 months as they would in their standard clinical care and an additional 6 monthly non-contrast MRI scan for 30 months (6 visits). If the ultrasound or non-contrast MRI raises concern for a possible liver cancer, an MRI scan with contrast (with dye injection) will be done for definitive diagnosis. All participants will have an MRI with contrast at the end of 30 months (M30) to ensure that no cancers were missed. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires to measure quality of life, anxiety, and their experience of MRI and ultrasound scans and data will be collected from their medical notes. The number of liver cancers detected by ultrasound will be compared to the number detected by the non-contrast MRI scans.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study AND

All genders, aged 18 years or above AND

Eligible for HCC US surveillance in the opinion of the local investigators AND

Child Pugh score A or B AND

Disqualifiers

• Contraindication to MRI

Known allergy / reaction to intravenous gadolinium contrast

Prisoners

Pregnancy or breast feeding

Trial population

Participants with a high risk of HCC will be included. Participants will have liver cirrhosis from Alcohol related liver disease, metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease, chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B or genetic haemochromatosis, or with chronic liver disease and prior successful treatment for HCC without recurrence and who are back in surveillance with USS.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • non contrast enhanced MRI

    Diagnostic test

    6 monthly non contrast enhance MRI

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: non contrast MRI AND standard of care USS1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Diagnostic performance for HCC

True positive tests for HCC per round of surveillance False positive tests for HCC per round of surveillance Positive predictive value for HCC per round of surveillance True negative tests for HCC over the 30 months of surveillance False negative tests for HCC over the 30 months of surveillance Sensitivity and specificity of nceMRI and USS for HCC over 30 months of surveillance

Time frame
from enrolment to 30 months

Secondary outcomes

1

stage and size of HCC at diagnosis

Numbers of HCC detected by nceMRI and USS at a very early, early, intermediate or advanced stage as defined by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. The number and size of HCC tumours per participant with HCC The number of new indeterminate lesions identified at each surveillance round

Time frame
from enrolment to 30 months
2

proportion of participants that receive treatment with curative intent

Proportion of participants diagnosed with HCC who go on to receive treatment with curative intent

Time frame
from enrolment to 30 months
3

Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression

Results of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire

Time frame
from enrolment to 30 months
4

participant experience

Results of participant experience questionnaire

Time frame
baseline, and month 24

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Oxford

Lead sponsor

Bournemouth University

Collaborator

Glasgow Caledonian University

Collaborator

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Collaborator

University of Nottingham

Collaborator