About this trial
A multicenter, randomized, parallel group, endoscopist blinded study to assess the diagnostic performance and sustainability of SCALE-EYE in a screening and surveillance colonoscopy population.
Sustainability will be evaluated in terms of the reduction in colonoscopies, associated waste and carbon footprint.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Participants aged 55-80
Scheduled for fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening or surveillance colonoscopy
Polyps of all forms ≤25 mm as assessed by the endoscopist
Disqualifiers
No detected colorectal polyps or only diminutive (≤5 mm) hyperplastic rectal polyps are present
Inadequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) <2 per segment)
Intraprocedural complications, not caused by the study device
Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
SCALE-EYE (1)
DeviceParticipants will undergo the colonoscopy and once a colorectal polyp is identified, the polyp will first be measured by optical assessment by the endoscopist, then with SCALE-EYE and lastly by biopsy-forceps assisted measurement.
SCALE-EYE (2)
DeviceParticipants will undergo the colonoscopy and once a colorectal polyp is identified, the polyp will first be measured by optical assessment by the endoscopist, then by biopsy-forceps assisted measurement and lastly with SCALE-EYE.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
SCALE-EYE diagnostic performance versus biopsy-forceps
The diagnostic performance of SCALE-EYE for polyp size categorization during real-time colonoscopy in comparison to polyp size categorization with biopsy-forceps assisted measurement (the reference standard). This will be measured by accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of SCALE-EYE categorization compared to size measurement with the reference standard.
Secondary outcomes
SCALE-EYE diagnostic performance versus optical assessment
The diagnostic performance of SCALE-EYE for polyp size categorization during real-time colonoscopy in comparison to optical assessment for polyp size measurement. This will be measured by accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of SCALE-EYE categorization compared to optical assessment.
Sustainability
The sustainability aspect of SCALE-EYE will be assessed by exploring whether the number of colonoscopies, the colonoscopy-associated waste and carbon footprint will be reduced by correct size measurement.
Learning curve
The learning curve will be evaluated by exploring the association between the number of measurements performed and the time needed for measurement and experienced difficulty.
Surveillance interval agreement
The level of agreement between the endoscopist advised surveillance interval as based on SCALE-EYE, optical assessment, and the reference standard (biopsy-forceps assisted measurement) will be compared.
Other outcomes
Endoscopist experience
Endoscopist experience (experienced = \>1000 independent colonoscopies; regular = 300 - 1000)
Age
Age in years of participant
Sex
Sex (male/female) of participant
Personal/family history of polyps or colorectal cancer (CRC)
Personal/family history of polyps or colorectal cancer (CRC) of participant - yes or no
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.