Additively Versus Subtractively Manufactured Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20+
SponsorHarvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

About this trial

This research is being done to evaluate the clinical, technical, biological, and aesthetic results of two different fabrication methods (additive and subtractive) for creating implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDPs). Patients will receive an iFDP, meaning an implant-supported crown, according to regular treatment protocols. The fabrication method used to create the implant-supported crown will be decided in a randomised way. Clinical and radiological examinations will be performed prior to and when receiving the implant-supported crown and during a follow-up period of 3 years. Furthermore, technician- and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated used questionnaires.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Signed Informed Consent Form in English language

≥ 20 years of age

In need of at least one definitive screw retained premolar or molar iFDP on an existing dental implant (Straumann AG)

Presence of at least one adjacent tooth at the implant site

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or lactating women

Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse

Severe periodontal and peri-implant disease

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AM manufacturing method

    Device

    additively manufactured implant-supported prostheses

  • SM manufacturing method

    Device

    subtractively manufactured implant-supported prostheses

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Additive manufacturingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Subtractive manufacturingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Clinical success

The primary outcome is clinical success of the iFDPs, which is defined as the iFDPs being free of all complications over the entire observation period.

Time frame
This outcome will be evaluated at the baseline and at the follow-up visits after 1 year, 2 years and 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Efficiency during manufacturing (dental technician) (time)

Fabrication time for the iFDP will be measured in minutes. The time needed for the manufacturing (subtractively or additively), the post-processing and the cementation on to the titanium base will be measured using a stopwatch.

Time frame
Periprocedural
2

Efficiency during manufacturing

The laboratory workflow during manufacturing will be assessed by the dental technicians using a questionnaire on success of the fabrication and postprocessing steps, and complications such as faulty/damaged iFDP. Dental technicians will report complications by answering yes/no to the occurrence of any complications, specifying occurred complications and reporting their quantity.

Time frame
Periprocedural
3

Chairside adjustment time

The total mean time for chairside adjustment (min) at iFDP delivery. A stopwatch will be used to measure the minutes between removing the healing abutment of the implant and final insertion of the prostheses after finishing any potential adjustments (for example approximal/occlusal contacts, polishing)

Time frame
Periprocedural
4

Survival rate

Survival will be defined as the presence of the iFDP independent of technical, biological or aesthetic complications.

Time frame
This outcome will be reported on the baseline visit and the follow-up visits after 1, 2 and 3 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: