AI-based Informational Assistant for Automated Point-of-care Documentation and Protocol Retrieval

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorWillemijn Berkhout

About this trial

Clinical rounds in the intensive care unit (ICU) involve substantial manual documentation. Retrieving the correct protocol text and structuring notes at the bedside is time-consuming and may contribute to variation in documentation quality. Modern artificial intelligence (AI) can help structure existing information and automate protocol look-ups within a restricted, manually selected document set.

The tool evaluated in this study acts as an AI-based informational assistant for clinicians. It (1) pre-populates a standardized physical-exam and daily-rounds format, (2) prepares a concise ICU course/overview using predefined formatting, and (3) retrieves relevant passages from protocols to enable rapid consistency checks by the clinician.

The AI-based informational assistant does not provide treatment recommendations or patient-specific advice; all outputs require clinician verification and clinical responsibility remains with the physician.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

ICU physician (nurse practicioner, resident, or staff intensivist) at the Erasmus MC.

Signed informed-consent for study participation.

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

ICU physicians (nurse practicioners, residents, and staff intensivists) working at the Adult ICU of Erasmus MC.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Implementation outcomes acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility

The mean scores and standard deviations of the 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree) closed-ended questions of the survey on the physicians' perspectives will be calculated. Standardised questionnaires AIM, IAM and FIM are used.

Time frame
Before integration of the AI-based informational assistant and 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks after integration.

Secondary outcomes

1

Perceived time saved when using the AI-based informational assistant during ICU rounds

The mean scores and standard deviations of the 5-point Likert scale closed-ended questions of the survey on the physicians' perceptions on retrieval speed.

Time frame
12-weeks after integration of the AI-based informational assistant .
2

Task-based efficiency, including time to (i) produce a structured rounds note and (ii) retrieve relevant protocol text

Timed predefined ICU round documentation tasks with and without AI-based informational assistant. Time difference will be calculated.

Time frame
Before integration of the AI-based informational assistant and 12-weeks after integration
3

Perceived usefulness, clarity, and trustworthiness

The mean scores and standard deviations of the 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree) closed-ended questions of the survey on the physicians' perspectives will be calculated.

Time frame
Before integration of the AI-based informational assistant and during the 12-weeks utilization.
4

Adoption and use, including frequency of use, retention over time, and interaction patterns (e.g., number/type of edits, use cases, feature use)

Adoption will be determined by frequency of use (interactions per participant per week) and retention (continued use over time), expressed as counts and proportions. Fidelity will be determined by the misusage per participant, reported as counts and proportions. Adoption and fidelity will be aggregated at both participant and cohort level. Interaction logs will be used to characterize use patterns, including number and type of edits, use cases and feature usage.

Time frame
During the 12-weeks utilization of the AI-based informational assistant.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Willemijn Berkhout

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: