About this trial
The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms in predicting difficult airways in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Preoperative airway assessments, including the Upper Lip Bite Test (UBLT), Mallampati score, Body Mass Index (BMI), thyromental distance (TMD), and sternomental distance (SMD), will be recorded. The study investigates whether AI models can provide higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting difficult intubation compared to traditional clinical scoring systems in the obese patient population.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years.
Scheduled for elective bariatric surgery under general anesthesia.
Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m².
Consenting to participate in the study.
Disqualifiers
Patients with known upper airway anatomical deformities, head and neck tumors, or a history of head/neck radiotherapy.
History of maxillofacial, airway, or cervical spine surgery.
Emergency surgeries.
Patients requiring planned awake fiberoptic intubation based on obvious preoperative clinical indicators.
Trial population
The study population consists of adult obese patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) undergoing elective bariatric surgery under general anesthesia in a tertiary academic medical center. This population represents individuals at a higher baseline risk for difficult airway management and intubation.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Preoperative Airway Assessment and Direct Laryngoscopy
Diagnostic testMeasurement of preoperative airway parameters including Upper Lip Bite Test (UBLT), Mallampati score, Body Mass Index (BMI), thyromental distance, and sternomental distance. Intraoperative airway view is graded using the Cormack-Lehane classification during standard direct laryngoscopy.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Model in Predicting Difficult Intubation
The predictive performance of the AI model will be evaluated by comparing its preoperative difficult airway prediction against the actual intraoperative direct laryngoscopy view. The intraoperative view is graded using the Cormack-Lehane classification system. Grades 3 and 4 are clinically defined as difficult intubation, while Grades 1 and 2 are defined as easy intubation. The primary metric of diagnostic accuracy will be the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve.
Secondary outcomes
Number of Intubation Attempts
Total number of direct laryngoscopy attempts required to achieve successful tracheal intubation.
Need for Alternative Airway Management Techniques
The frequency of requiring alternative airway devices or strategies (e.g., video laryngoscope, bougie, or fiberoptic bronchoscope) to secure the airway after a primary direct laryngoscopy.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.