About this trial
The goal of the proposed study is to examine whether brief training in regulation of craving (ROC-T) affects alcohol drinking. The study will consist of a basic screening (phone and online), and in person visit to determine eligibility and conduct pre-intervention baseline assessments, 1-4 training (ROC-T) visits, a post-intervention assessment visit, and 1-2 phone/online follow up assessments.The two active conditions of ROC-T are based on cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBT) and mindfulness-based treatments (MBT).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Mindfulness-Based Treatment-Regulation of Craving
BehavioralParticipants will be trained in using the MBT-based mindfulness strategy as described above ("notice craving and accept the feeling without judgment or reaction"). Participants will then be instructed to think of accepting and non-reactive responses when they see the instruction "ACCEPT" during ROC-T. On each trial, participants will receive an instruction and then be exposed to a novel alcohol image for 6 seconds. On 25% of the trials, they will see the LOOK instruction, and be allowed to experience craving (as baseline). On 75% of the trials, participants will see ACCEPT and then practice thinking about the negative consequences of drinking. After the picture disappears, they will rate their craving on every trial using a 1-5 Likert scale.
Cognitive-Based Therapy-Regulation of Craving
BehavioralParticipants will be trained in using the CBT strategy by first considering and reading about the negative consequences of drinking. Participants will then be instructed to think of those negative consequences ("Focus on the negative consequences associated with drinking)" when they see the instruction "REFRAME" during ROC-T.On each trial, participants will receive an instruction and then be exposed to a novel alcohol image for 6 seconds. On 25% of the trials, they will see the LOOK instruction, and be allowed to experience craving (as baseline). On 75% of the trials, participants will see REFRAME and then practice thinking about the negative consequences of drinking. After the picture disappears, they will rate their craving on every trial using a 1-5 Likert scale
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in frequency of heavy drinking days
Self-reports of daily alcohol use via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is the primary source for this outcome variable, with Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) data inserted to replace missing data from EMA. A heavy drinking day is defined as more than 3 or 4 standard drinks per day for women/men.
Change in average estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) per drinking day
Daily self-reports of alcohol use via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is the primary source for this outcome variable, with Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) data inserted to replace missing data from EMA. Estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) is based on number of standard drinks reported per day, duration of drinking, and total body water (based on sex, age, height, and weight).
Secondary outcomes
Change in alcohol-related negative consequences
Daily self-reports of alcohol-related negative consequences (Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire) via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is the primary source for this outcome variable. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol-related negative consequences.
Reduction in World Health Organization (WHO) drinking risk level
Drinking risk levels are based on grams of pure alcohol per day in a given period and include abstinent (0 grams males/females), low risk (1 to 40g males/1 to 20g females), medium risk (41 to 60g males/21 to 40g females), high risk (61 to 100g males/41 to 60g females), or very high risk (greater to or equal to 101g males/61g females).
Other outcomes
Change in momentary alcohol craving in daily life
Twice daily self-reports of momentary craving for alcohol via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Alcohol craving scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol craving.
Change in momentary acceptance of craving in daily life
Twice daily self-reports of momentary acceptance of alcohol craving via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Acceptance of alcohol craving scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater acceptance of alcohol craving.
Change in momentary reframing of craving in daily life
Twice daily self-reports of momentary reframing of alcohol craving via smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Reframing of alcohol craving scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater reframing of alcohol craving.
Change in momentary craving during Regulation of Craving (ROC) task
The ROC task involves viewing a series of alcohol images and following various instructions on particular trial when an alcohol image is shown. Participants report self-reported craving after each trial. There are 3 types of trials: 1) LOOK = look at alcohol image, 2) ACCEPT = use acceptance strategy, and 3) REFRAME = use the reframing strategy.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Yale University
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Collaborator