Allograft vs. Autograft Nonunion

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorWake Forest University Health Sciences

About this trial

The purpose of this research study is to find out if patients treated for nonunion fracture with autograft or allograft return to activity faster.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Patients 18 years or older

Long bone (tibia, femur, and humerus) nonunion appropriate for either study treatment: to be treated with bone graft harvested from a remote site or using reamer harvester (RIA)

Nonunion surgery to be performed at least five months after initial fracture fixation

Prior operative fixation of fracture

Disqualifiers

Patient that speaks neither English nor Spanish

Patients whose treatment plan includes local autograft only (available callus from the nonunion site or no planned bone graft)

Known active infection (defined as any clinical signs or symptoms of active infection, such as fevers, wound redness, warmth, swelling, induration or drainage, and abnormal while blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or C-reactive protein) being treated with antibiotics

Body mass index greater than 50

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Autograft
  • Allograft

Treatment groups

156 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups