An Adaptive Intervention to Increase Engagement to Community-Based Care After an ED Admission

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age8-17
SponsorRhode Island Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this study is to develop a feasible brief, family-based adaptive intervention, via SMART design, for youth with suicidal and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior (SSIB) to increase community-based mental health (MH) care attendance and reduce SSIB risk post emergency department (ED) admission. The intervention will focus to increase understanding on youth MH literacy, MH communication, and MH engagement. Integrating an adaptive intervention via a SMART design in the ED could address subsequent barriers to youth obtaining appropriate level of community-based MH care and therefore reduce ED readmissions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Youth 8 to 17 years

Youth presenting to the ED with suicide and self-injurious behavior

Youth living at home with at least one legal guardian/caregiver

Disqualifiers

Youth presenting to the ED with psychosis, sexual assault, child abuse

Youth in police custody,

Youth with an active investigation with the department of child and youth services (DCYF)

Youth unable to assent due to severity of illness or developmental disabilities,

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • adaptive intervention

    Behavioral

    We will utilize an adaptive interventions via Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design provide a tailored, stepped-care approach for the type, intensity, and dose of treatment, thus, providing the most intensive care to only those who need it, particularly treatment non-response. First, youth and caregivers (dyads) will be randomized to receive 1st-stage interventions in the ED, either the digital psychosocial-only (PS) condition or the psychosocial with digital health communication (PS+text) condition. If identified as non-response at 2-weeks, then dyads will be re-randomized to 2nd-stage intervention(s). Specifically, the PS condition non-responders will be re-randomized to the PS+text condition or the PS+text+FN condition. The 1st-stage PS+text condition non-responders will receive the PS+text+FN condition only.

Treatment groups

186 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: PsychosocialExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Psychosocial with text messagesExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Psychosocial with text messages and family navigatorExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Intervention Feasibility

Recruitment rate (% of ppl who agree to be in the study), Study completion (% of ppl who complete entire study)

Time frame
3-month & 6-month follow-up assessments
2

Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA)

Youth Attendance to Community-based Mental Health Care. CASA question and caregiver report of youth attendance in behavioral health care/community-based mental health services (yes or no) after discharge from emergency department admission.

Time frame
3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments
3

Intervention Acceptability

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. An 8-item questionnaire that provides (positive \& negative) feedback from user opinion. Higher scores = greater satisfaction with intervention.

Time frame
3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Rhode Island Hospital

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Collaborator