An OCD Prevention Programme for at Risk Adults

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorBabes-Bolyai University

About this trial

The main purpose of this randomised clinical trial is to test the efficacy of a prevention program for adult who are at risk of developing OCD, thus constituting a form of tertiary prevention.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

clinically diagnosed OCD

current psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment

personality disorder diagnosis

suicidal ideation

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Prevention

    Behavioral

    A cognitive-behavioural prevention programme.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: PreventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in OCD symptoms on the OCI-R after the intervention

The OCI-R is a validated self-report instrument assessing OCD symptoms. Possible scores range from 0 to 72. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
2

Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the PHQ-9 after the intervention

The PHQ-9 is a validated self-report instrument assessing depressive symptoms. Possible scores range from 0 to 27. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
3

Change from baseline in anxiety symptoms on the GAD-7 after the intervention

The GAD-7 is a validated self-report instrument assessing anxiety symptoms. Possible scores range from 0 to 21. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in experiential avoidance on the EAQ after the intervention

The EAQ is a validated self-report instrument assessing experiential avoidance. Possible scores range from 15 to 90. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
2

Change from baseline in cognitive distortions on the OBQ-44 after the intervention

The OBQ-44 is a validated self-report instrument assessing cognitive distortions in OCD. Possible scores range from 7 to 308. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
3

Change from baseline in uncertainty intolerance on the IUS after the intervention

The IUS is a validated self-report instrument assessing intolerance of uncertainty. Possible scores range from 27 to 135. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
4

Change from baseline in resilience on the RSA after the intervention

The RSA is a validated self-report instrument assessing resilience in adults. Possible scores range from 43 to 215. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2

Other outcomes

1

Change from baseline in life quality on the WHOQOL-BREF after the intervention

The WHOQOL-BREF is a validated self-report instrument assessing life quality in adults. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
2

Change from baseline in irrationality on the ATQ after the intervention

The ABS-AV is a validated self-report instrument assessing irrationality in adults. Possible scores range from 24 to 120 Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2
3

Change from baseline in global health on the GHQ-12 after the intervention

The GHQ-12 is a validated self-report instrument assessing global health in adults. Possible scores range from 0 to 36. Change = end of intervention score - baseline score

Time frame
Baseline and Week 2

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Babes-Bolyai University

Lead sponsor

Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research

Collaborator