Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With DES Eluting in Patients With CAD

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorSeung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.

About this trial

This study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography-guided anatomic complete revascularization and fractional flow reserve-guided physiologic complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Men or women between the ages of 19and older

Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI Significant lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation.

The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Disqualifiers

Coronary lesions resulting in the expected inability to perform FFR (ex, severe tortuosity or extreme angulation of the vessels)

Chronic total occlusion

Failed PCI of severe stenotic (diameter stenosis > 90%) or ACS culprit lesions

Previous PCI within 6 months before the index procedure

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Procedure/Surgery

    Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Treatment groups

2,400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: quantitative coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: fractional flow reserve-guided PCIActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of Participants with death

Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death

Time frame
12month
2

Number of Participants with MI

Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.

Time frame
12month
3

Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization

Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.

Time frame
12month

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of Participants with death

Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death

Time frame
5years
2

Number of Participants with MI

Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.

Time frame
5years
3

Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization

Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.

Time frame
5years
4

Number of Participants with bleeding

Major or minor bleeding according to definitions from TIMI

Time frame
5years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.

Lead sponsor

Asan Medical Center

Sponsor institution

Biotronik Korea Co., Ltd

Collaborator