About this trial
Large prospective comparative observational study in numerous reference centers in France, comparing infectious complications in patients admitted for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspiration performed with or without antibiotic prophylaxis (ATBp) according to the usual practices.
This is a prospective, comparative, observational, multicenter study, with the primary objective of comparing the infection rates in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) aspirated under EUS, with and without the administration of ATBp.
A sample size of 1702 patients will be needed over a 3-year study period.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patient referred for diagnostic aspiration of a pancreatic cystic lesion
Patient aged 18 years or older
Patient with ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3 status
No participation in another concurrent clinical study
Disqualifiers
Patient under 18 years old
Patient with ASA 4 or ASA 5 status
Pregnant woman
Patient with coagulation disorders preventing the performance of an EUS-FNA: PT < 50%, platelets < 50,000/mm³, current effective anticoagulation, ongoing clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor treatment
Trial population
Patients with pancreatic cystic lesions for whom an EUS-FNA is indicated
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
EUS-FNA
Procedure/SurgeryPuncture of pancreatic cystic lesion with a fine needle under EUS guidance
ATBp
DrugAntibiotic prophylaxis consists of a single intravenous administration before or at the beginning of the procedure according to the common practices of each practitioner or unit
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Post EUS-FNA PCL infection rate
Post-EUS-FNA infection rate of PCL (patients exhibiting clinical and biological signs - fever \>38.5°C, neutrophilic leukocytosis, elevated CRP, pathogen identification in blood cultures - indicative of sepsis requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy). The occurrence of the aforementioned clinical and biological signs, along with imaging evidence (such as cyst wall thickening or presence of intracystic air images) and the absence of another infection source (urinary, pulmonary, venous, etc.) will lead to the diagnosis of post-FNA infection. Centralized validation of infection cases will be conducted by an expert panel based on clinical, biological, and imaging findings.
Secondary outcomes
Rate of urinary infectious complications
Number of patients with at least one urinary infection within 21-30 days after EUS-FNA
Rate of post-ATBp allergic reactions
Number of patients with at least one allergic reaction within 21-30 days after EUS-FNA
Duration and extension of hospitalization
Number of hospitalization days per stay within 30 days following EUS-FNA
Diameter of the needle used for EUS-FNA
25G, 22G, 20G, or 19G
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: