Aphasia Physical EXercise Study: Randomized Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorUniversity of California, Berkeley

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of a high-intensity exercise program on recovery in individuals with post-stroke aphasia. The high-intensity exercise program has been specifically designed for individuals with post-stroke aphasia and includes an interval training full-body workout, which can increase cardiovascular fitness, improve muscle strength and motor performance, and maximize cognitive and language gains. The main question this study aims to answer is:

• Does participation in a high-intensity exercise program lead to changes in physical health, language, cognitive, motor recovery, psychological and/or psychosocial domains?

Participants will be randomly assigned to either a high-intensity exercise program (target intervention) or a low-intensity exercise program (control intervention) delivered over 12-weeks in a group setting.

Outcome measures will be collected once immediately after the intervention period and once during the following 12-week maintenance period to capture short- and long-term effects of the exercise program.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aphasia following ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke

Aphasia as determined by a standardized language test (Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient < 93.8 at study intake)

At least 6 months from the last stroke

Proficient in English before the stroke

Disqualifiers

Prior history of dementia, neurologic illness (other than stroke), or recent (last 3 years) substance abuse

Significant visual or hearing disabilities (e.g., neglect, uncorrected visual or hearing loss) that interfere with testing

Self-report uncontrolled cardiorespiratory and/or metabolic disorders incompatible with exercise

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • High-intensity physical exercise

    Behavioral

    We have developed a new exercise program specifically designed for individuals with post-stroke aphasia, Aphasia Physical EXercise (APEX), to provide a safe, stroke- and aphasia-friendly physical exercise intervention to achieve optimal physical fitness and cognitive/language gains. This intervention, based on published research and clinical practice recommendations, is a high-intensity interval training full-body workout optimized to accommodate the range of motor abilities and general deconditioning observed in stroke survivors.

  • Low-intensity physical exercise

    Behavioral

    As an active control intervention, a low-intensity non-aerobic exercise program was selected that mirrors more closely the standard-of-care physical therapy currently provided to stroke patients. This control intervention will offer the same level of participant involvement and type of interaction, but without the intensity element, i.e., it will not incorporate the cardiovascular and the strengthening components.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: High-intensity physical exerciseExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Low-intensity physical exerciseActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change on the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) - Aphasia Quotient

The Aphasia Quotient from the Western Aphasia Battery (a standardized language test) measures overall severity of language impairment in aphasia and ranges from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicative of more severe aphasia.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

1

Change on the WAB subtest scores

The subtests from the Western Aphasia Battery (a standardized language test) measure different language capacities. Specifically, we will look at Spontaneous Speech, Fluency, Auditory Verbal Comprehension, Repetition, Naming and Word Finding subtest scores.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
2

Change on the Curtiss-Yamada Comprehensive Language Evaluation - Revised (CYCLE-R)

A sentence-to-picture matching tasks that evaluates comprehension of sentences of varying complexity. The scores range from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicative of better comprehension abilities.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
3

Changes on Category and Letter Verbal Fluency tasks

Test of word retrieval and executive control abilities such as updating, shifting, and inhibiting. Participants are asked to name as many items as possible in 1 minute for a given category (e.g., clothes) and for a given letter (e.g., "s").

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
4

Change on the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT)

Aphasia naming test to assess word retrieval abilities. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating greater naming ability.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.

Other outcomes

1

Changes on the Narrative Discourse Sample

Analysis of discourse samples elicited using the WAB-R picture description, the Cat rescue story and the Cinderella story retell, narrative tasks commonly used in aphasia research.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
2

Changes on the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)

A multi-component assessment of postural stability during walking and ability to perform additional motor tasks while walking.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
3

Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

The 20-item self-rating questionnaire evaluates perceived mood and level of functioning within the past seven days. The scores range from 0-60. A score equal to or above 16 indicates a person at risk for clinical depression.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.
4

Changes on the General Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7)

The 7-item self-report scale is used to identify anxiety based on problems experienced in the last two weeks. The scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicative of more pronounced anxiety symptoms.

Time frame
(T1) Baseline: at the start of the study; (T2) Pre-treatment: 1 week prior to the start of the intervention; (T3) Post-treatment: the week immediately following the intervention; (T4) Follow-up: 3 months after the conclusion of the intervention.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, Berkeley

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Collaborator

California State University, East Bay

Collaborator

University of San Francisco

Collaborator

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Collaborator