About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether child life services can enhance the experiences of children and caregivers during skin prick testing. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Can child life services alleviate children's pain and enhance procedural compliance? 2. Can child life services reduce caregivers' anxiety and improve their satisfaction? Researchers will compare children who receive child life services with those who receive standard care to determine whether the intervention can optimize procedural experience and overall satisfaction.
Participants will receive either child life services or standard care during the skin prick test.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Meet the indications for skin prick test (SPT)
Aged 1-18 years
Voluntarily agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent
Disqualifiers
Meet the contraindications for SPT
Presence of psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment
Severe dysfunction of vital organs such as the heart, brain, or kidneys
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Standard Care (in control arm)
BehavioralNurses introduce the environment, personnel, and procedure, review the child's medical and allergy history, and confirm informed consent. The SPT is then performed according to clinical standards. After the procedure, children remain under observation, during which nurses monitor for any discomfort and provide guidance to avoid scratching the test site. Finally, nurses measure and interpret the results and provide basic health education to the child and caregivers.
child life services
BehavioralChildren in the intervention group receive standard care plus support from a Child Life Specialist (CLS) throughout the SPT procedure. The CLS provides age-appropriate preparation, distraction, and emotional support to both children and caregivers before, during, and after the procedure. The CLS also monitors the child's responses, helps manage any anxiety or resistance, supports caregivers emotionally, and explains test results and post-procedure care in an understandable manner.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale score
Use the FLACC scale to assess pain, higher scores indicate greater pain (0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-10 severe pain).
the Wong-Baker FACES score
Use the Wong-Baker FACES scale to assess pain, higher scores indicate greater pain (0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-10 severe pain).
the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Use the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pain, higher scores indicate greater pain (0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-10 severe pain).
Child procedural compliance
During the skin-prick test, compliance was rated as: Full: complete cooperation with the nurse; Partial: test completed despite crying or resistance; None: test impossible owing to non-copliance Overall compliance rate = (full + partial) / total × 100%. A higher overall compliance rate indicates better overall compliance with the skin-prick test procedure.
Secondary outcomes
Procedure duration
Number of interruptions
Caregiver anxiety
Caregiver anxiety was assessed with the 10-item short-form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (five state and five trait items); each item is scored 1-4, with higher total scores indicating greater anxiety (Cronbach's α = 0.918).
Caregiver satisfaction
satisfaction was rated by caregivers on a 5-point scale: 5 = very satisfied, 4 = satisfied, 3 = neutral, 2 = dissatisfied, 1 = very dissatisfied.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.