ARPE Training for Manual Handling Workers: A Quasi-Experimental Study on Ergonomic Knowledge and Practice

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-60
SponsorUniversiti Teknologi Mara

About this trial

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether an Augmented Reality-based ergonomic training module (ARPE) can improve ergonomic knowledge, self-prevention, and self-evaluation practices among adult manual material handling (MMH) workers in warehouses. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the ARPE training module improve workers' ergonomic knowledge?

Does it enhance their ability to prevent and assess risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs)?

Researchers will compare an intervention group using the ARPE module with a control group receiving traditional training based on national ergonomic guidelines to see if the AR module leads to better outcomes.

Participants will:

Attend a briefing and use the ARPE training via the MAKAR XR app

Complete self-assessment questionnaires at baseline, week 1, and week 6

Receive reminders and follow-ups through WhatsApp

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Augmented Reality Ergonomics Training (ARPE)

    Device

    Participants in this arm will receive an interactive training module using Augmented Reality (AR) delivered via the MAKAR XR app. The module aims to enhance ergonomic knowledge, self-prevention, and self-evaluation related to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs)

  • Conventional Ergonomics Training

    Behavioral

    Participants in this arm will receive conventional ergonomic training based on the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) guidelines for manual material handling (MMH) workers. The training includes lectures, printed materials, and standard instructional content focused on safe lifting techniques, proper posture, risk factor identification, and strategies to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). This training is delivered in a one-time session with follow-up reminders, simulating current standard practices in workplace safety education.

Treatment groups

78 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Conventional Ergonomics TrainingActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Augmented Reality Ergonomics TrainingExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Improvement in Ergonomic Knowledge

Description: Participants' ergonomic knowledge will be assessed using the Ergonomic Knowledge Domain Questionnaire, a validated 8-item multiple-choice instrument measuring understanding of ergonomic principles, awareness of risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), and correct manual handling practices. Scale Title: Ergonomic Knowledge Domain Questionnaire Score Range: 0 to 8 Scoring: 1 point per correct answer Interpretation: 0-3 = Low knowledge 4-5 = Moderate knowledge 6-8 = High knowledge Outcome Direction: Higher scores reflect improved ergonomic knowledge and better learning outcomes following the ARPE training module. The effectiveness of the intervention will be determined by comparing the scores across three time points between the intervention and control groups.

Time frame
Baseline (T0) - Prior to training Week 1 Post-Training (T1) Week 6 Follow-Up (T6)

Secondary outcomes

1

Improvement in Self-Prevention Practices Toward Ergonomic Risks

This outcome will be measured using the Self-Prevention Domain Questionnaire, a validated 6-item self-assessment instrument using a 7-point Likert scale to evaluate participants' self-reported preventive behaviors and attitudes toward managing ergonomic risks at the workplace. Scale Title: Self-Prevention Domain Questionnaire Score Range: 6 to 42 Scoring: Each item is rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) Interpretation: 6-21 = Poor self-prevention 22-31 = Moderate self-prevention 32-42 = Good self-prevention Outcome Direction: Higher scores indicate greater awareness and better self-preventive ergonomic practices. Scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups at three assessment points to determine changes in prevention practices after training.

Time frame
Baseline (T0) - Prior to training Week 1 Post-Training (T1) Week 6 Follow-Up (T6)

Other outcomes

1

Improvement in Self-Evaluation of Ergonomic Practices

This outcome will be measured using the Self-Evaluation Domain Questionnaire, a validated 5-item instrument using a 7-point Likert scale to assess how frequently participants apply ergonomic principles in their daily work practices and reflect on their own ergonomic behavior following the training. Scale Title: Self-Evaluation Domain Questionnaire Score Range: 5 to 35 Scoring: Each item is rated from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) Interpretation: 5-17 = Low ergonomic self-practice 18-26 = Moderate ergonomic self-practice 27-35 = High ergonomic self-practice Outcome Direction: Higher scores indicate more frequent application and internalization of ergonomic practices, reflecting the participant's behavioral response to the training. Scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups at three time points to assess sustained behavioral changes.

Time frame
Baseline (T0) - Prior to training Week 1 Post-Training (T1) Week 6 Follow-Up (T6)

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: