About this trial
This study aims to evaluate whether an artificial intelligence-assisted monitoring system can improve the training of novice physicians in electronic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. The study will compare AI-assisted training with conventional training in terms of post-training examination performance.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Otorhinolaryngology residents or standardized residency training physicians.
No prior independent experience in electronic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy.
Holding both a physician qualification certificate and a physician practice certificate registered at the study institution.
Willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.
Disqualifiers
Previous participation in other endoscopy training studies.
Inability to complete the required continuous training period
Aged 18 years or older.
Male or female.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Monitoring System for Electronic Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy
DeviceThe AI-assisted monitoring system analyzes electronic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy video in real time and provides prompts regarding anatomical sites that have been examined. Examined anatomical sites are displayed on the screen, and the system provides information such as examination time and number of anatomical sites covered. The system is used as an adjunctive training tool and does not replace the clinical judgment of supervising physicians.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Post-training procedural performance score
Each post-training procedure will be video recorded and assessed by blinded expert raters using Flexible Pharyngo-Laryngoscopy Assessment Tool (FLEXPAT). The scale includes 9 mandatory items, each scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 9 to 45 points. A higher score indicates better procedural performance.
Secondary outcomes
Anatomical Site Coverage Rate
Examination Time
Image Quality Score
Image quality will be evaluated by professional raters across two dimensions based on the images captured during the procedure: preservation of anatomical sites and mucosal clarity. Each dimension is scored out of a maximum of 5 points, with a total combined score of 10 points.
Patient Comfort
Patient comfort will be evaluated based on clinical observation of examination-related discomfort, such as gag reflex, and categorized as good comfort, poor comfort, or very poor comfort.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: