Artificial Intelligence-Assisted vs Surgeon-Planned Trajectories in Freehand Femoral Neck Screw Fixation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different methods of screw path planning-AI-assisted versus surgeon-directed-in freehand percutaneous femoral neck fracture fixation surgery. The study will include adult patients diagnosed with femoral neck fractures who are eligible for cannulated screw fixation under fluoroscopic guidance.The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does AI-assisted screw path planning improve the radiographic accuracy of screw placement (screw deviation, tip position, and inter-screw parallelism)? Does AI-assisted planning reduce operative time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopy exposures, intraoperative blood loss (mL) and surgeon workload compared with surgeon-directed planning? Does AI-assisted planning reduce postoperative complications and improve functional outcomes compared to surgeon-directed planning? Researchers will compare the AI-assisted planning group to the surgeon-directed planning group to determine whether AI guidance contributes to enhanced surgical precision, reduced intraoperative burden, and improved recovery outcomes.

Participants will:

Undergo freehand percutaneous internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with either AI-assisted or surgeon-directed screw path planning, Receive standardized perioperative care and follow-up at defined intervals, Be evaluated through clinical assessments, imaging studies, and documentation of intraoperative and postoperative metrics over a 12-month follow-up period.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years;

Radiologically confirmed diagnosis of femoral neck fracture (displaced or non-displaced);

Scheduled to undergo internal fixation with cannulated screws as the initial treatment strategy during the study period;

Capable of understanding the study procedures and providing informed consent;

Disqualifiers

Evidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head on the affected side prior to surgery;

Inability to tolerate the surgical intervention;

Severe physical illnesses, cognitive problems (such as memory loss), or mental health conditions that may impair the ability to comply with medical instructions or attending scheduled follow-up appointments.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AI-Assisted Screw Path Planning

    Procedure/Surgery

    The trajectory for screw placement during femoral neck fracture fixation will be guided by an AI algorithm based on intraoperative X-ray imaging. The system will automatically suggest the screw entry point and trajectory, which are displayed for the surgeon to follow during freehand guidewire insertion under fluoroscopy. The surgeon will proceed with the operation after confirming the feasibility of the AI-generated plan. In principle, surgeons are advised not to modify the AI-recommended trajectory unless necessary, to preserve the independent evaluative value of the AI-assisted plan. If significant disagreement arises between the surgeon's judgment and the AI-recommended trajectory, a third-party orthopedic specialist-blinded to group allocation-will conduct an independent postoperative assessment of the screw placement's appropriateness and accuracy.

  • Surgeon-Directed Screw Path Planning

    Procedure/Surgery

    The screw trajectory will be entirely determined manually by the operating surgeon, based on personal experience and interpretation of intraoperative fluoroscopy, without reliance on any AI recommendation module.

Treatment groups

334 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: AI-Assisted Screw Path Planning GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Surgeon-Directed Screw Path Planning GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Radiographic Accuracy of Screw Placement

Accuracy of screw placement assessed on standardized anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

Time frame
Postoperative Day 1

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of Fluoroscopy Exposures

Total number of C-arm fluoroscopy shots used during screw placement will be recorded and compared between groups.

Time frame
Intraoperative
2

Operative Time

Total surgical time will be recorded and compared between the AI-assisted and surgeon-directed groups.

Time frame
Intraoperative
3

Intraoperative Blood Loss (mL)

Blood loss will be estimated intraoperatively and documented for each case.

Time frame
Intraoperative
4

Number of Drilling Attempts

Total number of drilling attempts required to achieve acceptable guidewire placement.

Time frame
Intraoperative

Other outcomes

1

Surgeon Confidence Score

Surgeon self-reported confidence in the trajectory planning and screw placement accuracy measured using a 5-point Likert scale.

Time frame
Immediately after surgery
2

AI Override / Modification Rate (AI Group Only)

Frequency and proportion of cases where the operating surgeon significantly modified or overrode the AI-recommended trajectory, with reasons recorded.

Time frame
Intraoperative

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.